The Signpost

News and notes

Education Program faces community resistance

Participants at the Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit in Boston, Massachusetts, 7–9 July 2011
Wikipedia in education is far from a new idea: years of news stories, op-eds, and editorials have focused on the topic; and on Wikipedia itself, the School and university projects page has existed in various forms since 2003. Over the next six years, the page was rarely developed, and when it did advance there was no clear goal in mind.
Recent background

2009 marked a turning point in this narrative, when the Wikimedia Foundation launched the Public Policy Initiative (PPI) for 2010–11 with support from the Stanton Foundation. The pilot received relatively wide media coverage and was seen as highly successful in improving its target articles, on American public policy. This success emboldened the organizers to expand the pilot worldwide. The Cairo pilot appears to have met with greater success, but a second pilot in India ran into significant difficulties and ended in failure. The considerable community backlash from the debacle in India—including many calls for its closure—threw the program's future into doubt.

More recently, an Education Working Group has been formed to look at reforming the coordination of the US and Canada Education Programs and to organize an eventual transition to a fully volunteer-run system.

RfC on the next step

The working group is now attempting to move into a new phase with a request for comment seeking community consensus to form a Wikimedia thematic organization—an independent organization recognized by the WMF as supporting Wikimedia's mission in relation to a specific topic area. This would be a non-profit entity incorporated as a 501(c) in the United States. The scope of the proposed organization would focus solely on American and Canadian institutions and leave open the option of assisting collaborations with any WMF site. The aims of the thematic organization would be to "advance teaching and learning; (b) bring in new editors, from university students to professors to content experts outside academia; (c) improve the breadth, scope, documentation, and accuracy of Wikipedia articles; and (d) promote the flow of free information and knowledge."

Opinion split

The RfC, however, has partly developed into a referendum on the education program itself, with a split between working group members and educators supporting, and Wikipedia community members opposing. Mike Cline, a supporter, working group coordinator, and long-time English Wikipedia editor, strongly stated:

Related articles
educationprogram

18 years a Wikipedian: what it means to me
31 August 2022

Why student editors are good for Wikipedia
27 February 2022

WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
30 January 2022

Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
31 October 2021

Changing the face of Wikipedia
29 August 2021

Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
25 April 2021

An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
29 November 2020

Teaching Wikipedia, Does advertising the gender gap help or hurt Wikipedia?
6 January 2016

Wikipedia in higher education; gender-driven talk page conflicts; disease forecasting
31 December 2014

My issues with the Wiki Education Foundation
31 December 2014

Wikipedia article published in peer-reviewed journal; Wikipedia in education
1 October 2014

Banning Policy, Gender Gap, and Waldorf education
24 September 2014

Improving the visibility of digital archival assets using Wikipedia
20 August 2014

Global Education—WMF's Perspective
13 August 2014

Leading universities educate with Wikipedia in Mexico
6 August 2014

Success in Egypt and the Arab world
30 July 2014

Education program gaining momentum in Israel
23 July 2014

Serbia takes the stage with Filip Maljkovic
16 July 2014

Exploring the United States and Canada with LiAnna Davis
9 July 2014

Wiki Education; medical content; PR firms
2 July 2014

Commas, draft namespace proposal, education updates
13 November 2013

Automatic detection of "infiltrating" Wikipedia admins; Wiki, or 'pedia?
25 September 2013

2012—the big year
7 January 2013

Education Program faces community resistance
8 October 2012

Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Memento extensions
10 September 2012

Sidebar and main page alterations; Recent Deaths; Education Program extension
27 August 2012

Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
9 July 2012

Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
9 April 2012

Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
26 March 2012

Liaising with the Education Program
12 March 2012

Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
12 March 2012

Update on Global Development, Wikipedia Day NYC is a success, JFK audio on Commons
30 January 2012

Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
12 December 2011

A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
7 November 2011

WMF Annual plan; Article Feedback tool; university outreach; brief news
18 July 2011

Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
11 July 2011

Education minister's speech copied from Wikipedia; Jimmy Wales interviewed; brief news
16 May 2011

Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
27 December 2010

WP prose praised, Public Policy update, education debate, WP documentary
8 November 2010

Experiments with article assessment
13 September 2010

Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
28 June 2010

Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
14 June 2010

Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
27 July 2009

Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
23 February 2009

Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities
9 May 2008

Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested
21 April 2008

Wales’ comments on citing Wikipedia produce BBC correction
10 December 2007

WikiProject Report: Education in Australia
26 November 2007

Study examines Wikipedia authorship, vandalism repair
8 October 2007

Academic journals multiply their analyses of Wikipedia
14 May 2007

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding
30 April 2007

Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
16 April 2007

Wikipedia classroom assignments on the rise
26 December 2006

Wikipedia in the news
20 November 2006

Professors criticize, praise Wikipedia in listserv discussions
31 July 2006

About Wikimania
29 May 2006

Press coverage this week
16 May 2005


More articles

18 years a Wikipedian: what it means to me
31 August 2022

Why student editors are good for Wikipedia
27 February 2022

WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
30 January 2022

Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
31 October 2021

Changing the face of Wikipedia
29 August 2021

Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
25 April 2021

An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
29 November 2020

Teaching Wikipedia, Does advertising the gender gap help or hurt Wikipedia?
6 January 2016

Wikipedia in higher education; gender-driven talk page conflicts; disease forecasting
31 December 2014

My issues with the Wiki Education Foundation
31 December 2014

Wikipedia article published in peer-reviewed journal; Wikipedia in education
1 October 2014

Banning Policy, Gender Gap, and Waldorf education
24 September 2014

Improving the visibility of digital archival assets using Wikipedia
20 August 2014

Global Education—WMF's Perspective
13 August 2014

Leading universities educate with Wikipedia in Mexico
6 August 2014

Success in Egypt and the Arab world
30 July 2014

Education program gaining momentum in Israel
23 July 2014

Serbia takes the stage with Filip Maljkovic
16 July 2014

Exploring the United States and Canada with LiAnna Davis
9 July 2014

Wiki Education; medical content; PR firms
2 July 2014

Commas, draft namespace proposal, education updates
13 November 2013

Automatic detection of "infiltrating" Wikipedia admins; Wiki, or 'pedia?
25 September 2013

2012—the big year
7 January 2013

Education Program faces community resistance
8 October 2012

Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Memento extensions
10 September 2012

Sidebar and main page alterations; Recent Deaths; Education Program extension
27 August 2012

Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
9 July 2012

Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
9 April 2012

Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
26 March 2012

Liaising with the Education Program
12 March 2012

Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
12 March 2012

Update on Global Development, Wikipedia Day NYC is a success, JFK audio on Commons
30 January 2012

Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
12 December 2011

A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
7 November 2011

WMF Annual plan; Article Feedback tool; university outreach; brief news
18 July 2011

Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
11 July 2011

Education minister's speech copied from Wikipedia; Jimmy Wales interviewed; brief news
16 May 2011

Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
27 December 2010

WP prose praised, Public Policy update, education debate, WP documentary
8 November 2010

Experiments with article assessment
13 September 2010

Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
28 June 2010

Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
14 June 2010

Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
27 July 2009

Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
23 February 2009

Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities
9 May 2008

Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested
21 April 2008

Wales’ comments on citing Wikipedia produce BBC correction
10 December 2007

WikiProject Report: Education in Australia
26 November 2007

Study examines Wikipedia authorship, vandalism repair
8 October 2007

Academic journals multiply their analyses of Wikipedia
14 May 2007

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding
30 April 2007

Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
16 April 2007

Wikipedia classroom assignments on the rise
26 December 2006

Wikipedia in the news
20 November 2006

Professors criticize, praise Wikipedia in listserv discussions
31 July 2006

About Wikimania
29 May 2006

Press coverage this week
16 May 2005

This RfC is about the future—the Future of the Wikimedia movement, Wikimedia Outreach and the US Canada Education Program. This RfC is not about, and should not be about the past. ... Those who have opposed this new organization to date, and indeed are calling for the elimination of the Education Program are focused on the past. ... [They] only cite the mistakes, the missteps and rarely give credit to the successes, to the good works by all sorts of ambassadors, students, faculty and WMF Education Program staff. ... I realize there have been missteps in the Education Program, but for opposers to characterize all the work done under [it] as a failure is not supported by the facts. ... Why is this partnership essential for the future of Wikipedia? If we truly believe in the mantra—the sum of all knowledge for the human race, and if we want to create an encyclopedia of world class quality and scope, we have to involve the Academic Community. It is doubtful we can continue robustly growing the encyclopedia without them.

Education professionals who support the program believe that without this form of outreach (assuming that professors will continue to assign their students to edit Wikipedia), their students will not receive the on-wiki interaction necessary for them or their articles to succeed. Theredproject commented that editing the site opened his students' eyes to the "questions of Free Culture, collaboration, and wikis." Ocaasi took a different approach, believing that the previous problems with the program have been addressed and that it deserves a "second chance" over one to two years to prove itself.

Opposers have largely focused on whether there is a need for the program. Fluffernutter commented that there is a "lack of evidence of any material benefit from the existence of the program. All signs I've seen have indicated that the program creates a lot of cleanup work for the community and very little in the way of useful content or new long-term contributors."

Other editors echoed her post: MER-C believes that the program "needs a massive haircut to bring it back to a scale where it is a net positive for the encyclopedia—i.e. similar to the Public Policy Initiative. Developing a formal, self-justifying bureaucracy around the program to further expand it is exactly the wrong way to go." At least one further oppose believed that spinning the program off from the WMF as planned would lead to less accountability for the program as a whole.

This contrast in views begs the question: is the education program worth the effort? The WMF published a US–Canada results page a few days after Fluffernutter's oppose, detailing the effects of the education program on Wikipedia over the first half of 2012 and including detailed graphs of the changes in quality. As assessed by a volunteer group of Wikipedia editors, 87.9% of articles were improved by student editing. On a 26-point quality scale, the articles were improved on average by 2.94 points; only eight articles saw a decrease in quality, with the worst dropping by two points. The report notes that existing articles were usually improved from the equivalent of weak Start-class articles to strong Start-class or C-class articles. New articles fell into the same area.

Another supporting view has come from a previously published and highly publicized op-ed written by English Wikipedia editor and current working group member Mike Christie for the Signpost last December. There, Christie concluded that the education program was necessary, because "if we manage the influx of academic interest correctly, Wikipedia will acquire an institutional connection to academia that will be a source of new content for our articles and an intellectual resource to assist with long-term growth. Wikipedia does not need to beg for respectability any more; it is already widely used by academics as a starting point for research, and sometimes for more than that. We need to accept our respectability, and plan to learn from—and teach—the academic community."

Opposing arguments mainly stem from experiences with the Indian pilot. The most notable document produced after its closure was by consultant Tory Read, which the Signpost covered in January. The results were stunning: a quantitative analysis done simultaneously with the report showed that only 21% of student-produced content survived after the necessary clean-up. The report itself chronicled the failures in communication and scale; the Indian pilot was five times larger than the Public Policy Initiative. Wikipedians voiced their opposition on the talk page, such as Theo10011:

With the sole exception of [Frank Schulenburg, the Global Education Program director], there isn't a single person who designed and implemented this program that I would be confident about editing themselves. They barely know how to edit themselves, who to ask for help, or how, what is the right and wrong practice. ... they are not versed in the en.wp policies and general editing culture, they were hired as consultants by WMF. ... This is a really important point, when the students and CAs they are overseeing, have the same or more experience than them, that is likely to be a bad start. I honestly believe they need more experience and time to learn the ropes first, before they design and run any future iteration of the education program here.

Yet while the opposition stemming from the Indian pilot is based on solid facts, it does not account for modifications made to the program over the last year. The Working Group RfC is still open for comments from the community, and the Signpost welcomes comments on the Education Program as a whole on the talk page.

Ed. note: the author volunteered with the Education Program as an Online Ambassador in late 2010 and early 2011.

In brief

St. Bartholomew's chapel on the Königssee in Bavaria is a popular tourist destination—from the winning article in the Core Contest: Alps.

















Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-10-08/News_and_notes