Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy

Editors of the Italian Wikipedia have shut the site down in protest against a law currently going through the Italian parliament. User:Vituzzu, an editor on Italian Wikipedia, explained the reasons behind the debate:

Today, unfortunately, the very pillars on which Wikipedia has been built – neutrality, freedom, and verifiability of its contents – are likely to be sunk permanently by paragraph 29 of an Italian Law also known as "DDL interception".

This legislative reform proposal, which the Italian Parliament is debating currently, provides, among other things, a requirement to all websites to publish, within 48 hours of the request without comment, a correction of any content that the applicant deems detrimental to their image. Unfortunately, the law does not require an evaluation of the claim by an impartial third judge: the opinion of the person allegedly injured is all that is required in order to impose such correction to any website.

Conversely, anyone who feels offended by any contents published on a blog, an online newspaper and most likely, even on Wikipedia, can directly request the removal of such contents and its permanent replacement with a "corrected" version, aimed to contradict and disprove the allegedly harmful contents, regardless of the veracity of the information deemed as offensive, and its sources.

Discussion in the "Bar" (equivalent to the English Wikipedia's Village Pump) resulted in broad support from editors for a "blackout", with all pages redirected to a page based on Vituzzu's words. This was done on October 4 and is still in force as of publishing time. The blackout has received some mainstream attention from various international news outlets; notable English-language reports include the BBC and the Washington Post. The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) issued an official statement supporting the Italian Wikipedians. In notable individual reactions from the Foundation-l mailing list, Sue Gardner tentatively supported the move, and Mike Godwin, the former legal counsel for the WMF, applauded the news, saying "It's very hard to get a government to change its mind. You have to challenge government officials in a big, dramatic (and usually longer-lasting) way to get their attention and make them responsive." However, there were also dissenting views. Kat Walsh, a WMF board member, believed that a complete blackout may have been going too far:

I agree that for a protest to be effective, it must cause real disruption, enough to cause people to see the effect and get attention. I'm not even sure what I would suggest as an alternative--perhaps a shorter duration of complete blackout, and a gigantic sitenotice afterward (or beforehand)? Advertising the existence of mirrors? Allowing people to access articles in a tiny window below a gigantic notice? I'm not sure. I think the action that was done may be too much, that maybe something could have been done to generate as much attention without cutting off access as much.

Discussion among community members is continuing at Meta's Wikimedia Forum.

For the second largest book fair in Europe, Swedish chapter Wikimedia Sverige produced three short films about why different target groups should edit Wikipedia. These films covered librarians, teachers and senior citizens respectively. Wikimedia Sverige has offered to help out anyone who wants a version in their own language. More information and localization efforts here.

• Steward elections drawing to close: Voting in the second steward elections of the year is due to end on 6 October 2011.
• Gardner on the controversial image filter: Wikimedia Foundation chief executive Sue Gardner posted on her personal blog an entry entitled "Editorial judgement and empathy", where she describes what she feels is a lack of imagination from participants in the image filter discussion.
• Wikimedia UK outlines activity for 2012: Wikimedia's UK chapter has published a 2012 Activity Plan which outlines on what activities and programmes they intend to spend money on next year, although they stress that it is not a budget. In the next few weeks, the chapter has scheduled an extraordinary general meeting to amend the chapter's constitution as part of a longstanding effort to get formal charity status in the UK.
• New administrator: The Signpost welcomes Wikipedia's newest administrator, bot operator Anomie. A veteran with over six years of editing, Anomie runs three active bots. There are no current Requests for Adminship at the time of writing.
• Wikimedia Indonesia pilot project: On Friday October 7, the first session will take place in a new three month collaboration between Wikimedia Indonesia and the Lontar Foundation hoped to result in 300 new articles about Indonesian writers, their works, and related foundations and organizations.
• Milestones: The Macedonian, Kyrgyz, Zeelandic and Gagauz Wikipedias reached milestones this week, with 50,000, 2,000 and 1,000 and 1,000 articles respectively. The Simple English Wikipedia celebrated its 200,000 registered editor.
• Second time around for Wiki Loves Monuments: The Wiki Loves Monuments project enjoyed great success in its pan-European second annual contest, accounting for a haul of over 165,000 images added to Wikimedia Commons. Around 80% of the 5,000 participants are estimated to be new contributors to Wikimedia projects. In the coming months, judges will undertake the process of narrowing down the entries, culminating in an announcement of the winners in early December.

← Previous "News and notes"

Next "News and notes" →

In this issue

3 October 2011 (all comments)

News and notes

In the news

WikiProject report

Featured content

Arbitration report

Technology report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

OMG, that's terrible about the Italian law - Can anybody design like a widget or something that is the equivalent of a black armband with the Wikipedia Italy logo on it that we can use to show solidarity? KConWiki (talk) 04:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it.wikipedia is closed, starting from 08.00 PM of October, 4th. It is not clear when the Italian wikipedia will restart its activities, nor it is clear if it will be able to re-open. In the meantime, Italian politicians discuss in Parliament their censorship rule to be imposed to Italian people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truman Burbank (talk • contribs) 11:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's back up now. I read the statement on the Italian wiki. There is a notice on the top of every page, however. Since I can't read italian... WikiCopter 00:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It does seem that the discussed change (i.e. putting the "manifesto", as it's been called, up for every page), actually has been implemented. It does not seem possible to access articles on the Italian Wikipedia. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 05:11, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, this is due to the accidental late publishing of this week's Signpost. I added a short blurb at the bottom of the story to explain the discrepancy. It's a bit out of tradition, but we'd look even more foolish then we already do if we didn't mention this had occurred. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, I just rewrote most of the article. Hope this isn't too big of a deal for everyone. :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • The front page still says "Italian Wikipedia threatens site shutdown [...]". I'd edit it, but it's (semi-)protected. 82.83.155.231 (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Interested readers will notice that the proposed law did not come about in a vacuum. The Burlesconi government has a history of passing laws that that benefit Silvio Berlusconi and his close colleagues, in particular laws that have meant criminal cases against Berlusconi have collapsed. The DDL intercettazioni originated in the wake of a number of leaked wiretaps of the regime, and negative press comment in that part of the print media not controlled by Berlusconi, notably La Repubblica. Rich Farmbrough, 11:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
  
• I would like to point out that this Vituzzu "user" which speaks out as a "spokesman for the italian wikipedia" is the one that has disclosed a private mail I sent him where I was commenting the Catholic sex abuse cases. This very same user has threatened me of legal action on this page written in sicilian after removing my sicilian admin priviliges. If someone is to be chosen for criticising the Italian Government that allegedly could be "responsible for likely sinking the very pillars on which Wikipedia has been built – neutrality, freedom, and verifiability of its contents – by paragraph 29 of an Italian Law also known as "DDL intercettazioni""... well IMHO I don't think he's the right person. Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]