Forks are everywhere. If you've got a barn or a stable, there should be a fork inside it to clean out the muck. There are forks in the road, on the internet, on the chess board, on antelopes, in rivers, in beards and tongues, in cryptocurrencies, and almost everybody has forks in their drawers. Maybe we should use chopsticks instead. – S

The Ledger's headline (paywalled) gives the main news: the Florida newspaper is asking for funds from its readers to support Wikipedia. But the bad news is that The Ledger needs to charge its readers to pay its bills. Otherwise, their readers will get cut off by the paywall. The good news is that they will give you "unlimited digital access (costing) $1 for the first 6 months". Everybody, it seems, needs a little green to support their publishing. The better news is that Wikipedia is still free for all readers and has no plans to change that. This reporter has no objections to you donating $2.75 or $25.00 or whatever amount you would prefer. It is not that the Wikimedia Foundation needs your cash now to forestall closing down this website next week, next month, or even next year, but it is just good planning for a non-profit organization to build a solid base of small donors who can ensure that this site will be around for a long time to come. The best news is that The Signpost will always be free – just as we have for almost 19 years – so long as Wikipedia keeps publishing. And to return the plug, Signpost readers should feel free to consider paying a dollar for six months of The Ledger. – S

In his ever-informative column in Slate, Stephen Harrison explains in detail why editors from WikiProject Highways created a new website forking Wikipedia's road articles. (We note that The Signpost scooped him on this story.)

In his usual style, Harrison breaks the story into an intriguing introduction, and several tines accompanied by quotes from participants and analysis of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In this particular case, he grabs you in the intro with "Wikipedia, road infrastructure, and drama—one of these things doesn’t sound like the other" and a mention of a video that "spills the tea." He then focuses on an editor, identified only as Ben (or bmacs001), and the tines include the difference between editors who are roadgeeks and railfans, with a brief note on possible cultural differences between American and European railfans.

The Wiki-rules discussed include notability, reliable sources, pseudoscience, and no original research.

Of course, no newspaper story is ever perfect: Harrison might have emphasized the fact that the fork has enjoyed a fairly successful start, or that there are no rules against forking Wikipedia (as long as you give proper attribution). Or that there are no prohibitions on users editing both Wikipedia and the fork, and few on importing text from the fork into Wikipedia itself. And he certainly should have mentioned that the word "fork" is likely an inherently funny word. – S

For more detail regarding the claims in this article, see this issue's special report.

In an article for Australian newspaper Quillette, Shuichi Tezuka raises some pointed objections to the way the Wikipedia community handles disputes over coverage of contentious material; for example, he expresses concern about "cognitive distortions" that are perpetuated "by reducing the population of people who raise [objections]... as these users have either quit Wikipedia or been permanently blocked from editing". Tezuka mention the famous "somewhat-viral tweet" of last October and related concerns about WMF spending (see previous Signpost coverage), and concludes that newly-formed fork Justapedia (which recently sparked a discussion on the administrators' noticeboard), is necessary to solve these problems, stating: "the need for such a competitor [to Wikipedia] is stronger now than it has been in past years, due to several recent controversies revolving around the manipulation and/or politicization of Wikipedia, along with a widespread perception that Wikipedia has not done enough to prevent this type of problem." The founder of Justapedia, user Atsme, wrote an op-ed expressing some of the same concerns for the Signpost back in 2020. – B

• Congressional staffers rely on Wikipedia...: The good news, according to a former staffer writing in Scientific American blogs, with amplification and analysis on The Hill, is that the U.S. Congress leans on Wikipedia to get smart fast on science crises, "from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster, to the 2014 Ebola outbreak, or the 2016 flooding of social media platforms by disinformation". The bad news is, they can't go deeper because they have gutted their own research arms and don't have staff with the requisite knowledge.
• ...and Wikipedia relies on staff whose pay scales may lag sector: Business Insider reports that "the salaries of Wikimedia executives are sparking an online debate about tech sector wages"; the fire was started by a screenshot of the WMF's 2021 IRS filing shared on X/Twitter on December 12, which showed the executive salaries of various high-profile figures within the foundation, including former CEO Katherine Maher and former COO Janeen Uzzell.
• Why is this night ... er, year, different from all other years?: Cricket, obviously: as written on Deseret News, "no other cricket-centric topics have appeared on the site's [that's us!] year-end most popular articles lists since they began doing the calculations in 2015." The year-end roundup of pageviews was also covered by the Associated Press, Fox Business and CNN, among others.
• Hey, look ma, I made it... on Wikipedia!: Back in October, Valeria Costa reported in Domani (in Italian) about how French physicist Pierre Agostini had gained a Wikipedia article – user Uhooep created it first on en.wiki – only after being jointly awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics, along with Anne L'Huillier and Ferenc Krausz. As noted by Costa, Agostini was not the first Nobel-winning figure who received the "WP:GNG treatment" upon his prestigious achievement, since Donna Strickland had been granted an article back in 2018 (mistakenly reported as 2020).
• The disrespect is real: In her review of the Hulu-exclusive TV series The Great, as part of the "Best Shows That Ended in 2023", The New York Times journalist and television critic Margaret Lyons humorously said that, "So many period dramas just feel like inert, expensive Wikipedia entries, but The Great, through its irreverence and artistry, was alive at every turn."
• No, Internet doesn't count...: In a November interview for El País (in Spanish), Spanish poet, musician and film director Antón Reixa [es] revealed that, back in 2011, he had shown his own Wikipedia article to the civil registration officer in an attempt to prove his identity and will to change his full name; however, the clerk shrugged it off, stating that "Internet [didn't] count".
• 100 Books (and one Wiki): Back in November, Italian journalist and literary critic Marino Sinibaldi shed a light on the Wikipedia article for the Bokklubben World Library — published by the Norwegian Book Club [no] in 2002 — during the 100th episode of Il Post-exclusive podcast Timbuctu, which was centered around famous lists of the most memorable books. Sinibaldi also cited Le Monde's 100 Books of the Century list and the BBC's The Big Read, among other examples.

• Wishing for a more accessible Internet: On 3 December, which marked the International Day of Persons with Disabilities, Nicolas Six reported in Le Monde (in French, partially behind pay-wall) that more than one million French citizens with several grades of visual impairment still struggle to surf on the Internet due to their condition. One of the interviewees, a 75-year-old woman, said that "despite taking weekly IT lessons, [she] can't even go on Wikipedia". If you want to know how to improve accessibility to our platform for all readers, then the Dos and don'ts list and the project pages for WikiProject Accessibility (which is also active on French Wikipedia) and WikiProject Usability should be good places to start from.
• Jimbo says no to crypto: As reported on Benzinga and CoinTelegraph, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales mocked Bitcoin through a post on X, a decision that brought him push-back from some notable figures within the community. Benzinga also noted that the Wikimedia Foundation had decided to stop accepting cryptocurrency donations back in May 2022, following a comprehensive three-month discussion within the community.
• Fake work on Wikipedia, or work about a fake Wikipedia?: Author and autofiction specialist Ben Lerner, whom we reported about on last month's disinformation report, was interviewed by radio magazine Here and Now, aired on WBUR-FM. Bizarrely, the host's introduction describes Lerner not as a fiction writer, but an "enterprising journalist" "test[ing] how much he could manipulate [Wikipedia] entries".
• Wikimedia RU dissolving: Several Russian media covered the shutdown of Wikimedia Russia, including The Moscow Times, RTVI, Vzglyad, RBK Daily, and TASS[1], as well as Radio Free Europe. See this month's In focus for more about the situation.

The Wikimedia Foundation has seen many requests like these. Dark mode is available in the Wikipedia mobile apps, but still not in the web browser. It’s been a common request from editors in the Community Wishlist Surveys and the rollouts of the Vector 2022 skin — hundreds of comments! We would like to thank for all these.

Some time ago, a few Foundation staff members, Volker, Alex, Carolyn, and MusikAnimal, built a dark mode script as an experiment. It has become a popular gadget across wikis. But until this year, making dark mode a regular part of the interface was not possible. Now, with help from communities, we are finally ready to work on this feature! Continue reading to learn about the benefits of dark mode, what made it possible, and how to get involved.

Dark mode improves accessibility. The primary benefit is that it reduces eye strain. When we’re in a long reading or editing session, particularly when it’s dark around us, the contrast between a bright screen and the surrounding darkness can cause discomfort. Dark mode mitigates this by giving us a darker background with light text, reducing glare and minimizing eye fatigue. This feature is especially helpful for night-time readers or readers who spend lots of time on their devices.

Many readers and editors favor dark mode. The softer, darker hues can be less harsh on the eyes and create a more relaxed reading environment, enhancing the reading experience.

In the past, it was not possible to change our web interface based on the preferences of logged-out users. These users couldn’t set a preferred page density, change the font size, or set a dark mode. Also, the MediaWiki skin and design architecture made it difficult to maintain two color schemes (light and dark). It was necessary to improve these three facets first.

• We began with improving the skin architecture – we were doing this while building Vector 2022. This laid the foundation for further interface changes.
• Next, the Design Systems team introduced Codex and with it “design tokens”. These are useful variables, like templates on wikis that allow us to make and centralize color definitions.
• Finally, we added the ability to provide preferences for logged-out users. When working on Vector 2022, we built a toggle changing the content area width. After listening to editors’ opinions and some creative thinking, we made it available for logged-out users, too. Next, our engineers and architects created a wider system, allowing us to make more settings customizable.

With this system in place, we could begin planning the Accessibility for reading project. This is our response to users’ need to read the wikis comfortably and to adjust the settings. In the first step, logged-in and logged-out users will be able to select different font sizes and text density. Dark mode will be next.

Editors control content which includes templates: amboxes, infoboxes, navboxes, as well as bitmaps, timelines, tables, and more. Some of those, like weather and sports tables, use colors in a meaningful, or semantic, way. Simply inverting these colors would immediately lose their meaning. We need to find other options.

Whatever technical approach we choose, we will coordinate with editors. We may build different solutions for big and small communities. In the coming weeks, we will reach out with specific questions and ideas.

We would like to start gradually, with a limited number of communities and wikis. First, the dark mode would be a beta feature. As such, it would only be available for logged-in users who decide to enable it. Any logged-in user will have an opportunity to test alongside us as we build out the final version.

We will talk to interface admins, template and module maintainers, and editors interested in making the wikis easier to read for everyone. Together with them, we would like to work on recommendations for making pages more friendly to dark mode. We will also help them adjust the current code on the wikis. When enough pages become dark-mode friendly, we will roll dark mode out for logged-out users. (On a side note, we aren’t sure how many pages are enough. We will ask about that, too!)

How do you feel about all this? Write on our project talk page. Be sure to subscribe to the Web team newsletter to never miss an update from us. Thank you! —OV, SG, JR (WMF)

The Italian Court of Audit publicly opposed a recent decision by the Ministry of Culture, led by Gennaro Sangiuliano, to establish minimum fees for the production and publication of digital reproductions of cultural heritage, as recently reported by Wikimedia Italia, as well as several national media (in Italian; the latter two links are behind pay-wall).

As written by Italian lawyers Deborah De Angelis and Giuditta Giardini for Communia last July, in Italy the so-called Cultural Heritage and Landscape Code (CCHL) has been in force since 2004; basically, it was intended to "support the role of cultural heritage institutions in sustainable economic and social development", granting them, among other privileges, discretion to choose whether to make art works such as paintings, frescoes and statues available in the public domain, through the attribution of a Creative Commons licence or, at least, the digital reproduction of images.

However, in recent years some state-owned institutions have taken advantage of this interpretation of the CCHL to start lawsuits against commercial uses of works by Italian artists which, theoretically, should already be in the public domain – for example, Michelangelo’s David, Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man and Sandro Botticelli’s The Birth of Venus. As explained by De Angelis and Giardini, these initiatives are likely in contrast with the Article 14 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, adopted by the European Union in 2019 and transposed into domestic law by Italy two years later.

In April of this year, the Italian Ministry of Culture caused even more headaches by publishing "guidelines" for the introduction of minimum fees for the commercial use of digital reproductions of state-owned cultural heritage, including works in the public domain (see previous coverage on Diff and the Signpost). The decree, which was harshly criticized by numerous experts and researchers, contradicts the principles expressed both in the CCHL itself – more specifically, the Articles 1 and 6 – and the Faro Convention (which Italy signed and ratified): they stress the importance of full freedom of access to and sharing of reproductions of cultural heritage in the public domain. If officially implemented, the measures included in the MoC’s decree might not only impoverish Wikimedia’s projects, but also damage activities of research and promotion of Italian culture.

Now, though, the Italian Court of Audit also expressed concern about the ministry's bill in a report named The results of monitoring activities done in the year 2022 and the consequential measures adopted by administrations. In their “Review of consequential measures adopted by administrations" – starting from page 157 of the report – the court give credit to the MoC’s offices for their “important effort in digitization”, as for the goals set by the Digital Library and the National Recovery and Resilience Plan [it], while noting how the introduction of the aforementioned minimum fees looks to be “against [this] trend”, especially in regards to the benefits of open access:

For some time now, Open Access has proven to be a powerful multiplier of wealth not only for the cultural institutions themselves [...], but also in terms of increasing the GDP, and is therefore considered a strategic asset for the social, cultural and economic development of the [European] Union’s member countries. [...] The introduction of such a "fee schedule" seems, moreover, to take into account neither the operative peculiarities of the web, nor the potential damage to the community, which should be measured in terms of [...] lost opportunities, as well; therefore, [the decree] also stands in obvious contrast to the clear indications coming from the National Digitization Plan (PND) of cultural heritage.

What’s more, Avvenire and Il Sole 24 Ore (see the links cited at the top of this story) reported that the Court of Audit had already endorsed the free circulation of digital reproductions of cultural heritage in public domain in an October 2022 document, which included the following quote:

The radical transformations digital [devices and services] have produced in our society encourage [...] the abandonment of traditional "proprietary" paradigms, in favor of a more democratic, inclusive and horizontal vision of cultural heritage. Forms of economic return based on the "sale" of the single image appear anachronistic and largely outdated since, moreover, they are patently uneconomic. There is evidence that, in some cases, the ratio of costs incurred in managing the collection service to the actual revenue generated produces a negative balance.

The question is: will the MoC get the memo this time around? – O

On December 19, 2023, Stas Kozlovsky, the Executive Director of Wikimedia Russia, posted a message on a community page in the Russian Wikipedia, saying that after almost 25 years of work as an associate professor at Moscow State University, he had recently been summoned by the vice-rector and told there was "reliable information" about the imminent intention by Russian authorities to declare him a "foreign agent". He said he was allowed to choose either being dismissed "for absenteeism" or resigning on his own, and eventually "chose the latter" option.

Kozlovsky proceeded to call an emergency meeting of Wikimedia Russia, where he shared this news, and a general decision was taken to close the organization; the liquidation process would take several months.

Stas had taken over as head of Wikimedia Russia earlier this year, after the previous director of the organization, Vladimir V. Medeyko, was indefinitely banned for establishing a government-approved fork of the Russian Wikipedia (see previous Signpost coverage). See the In focus column of this issue for more details on Wikimedia Russia's shut-down, as well as reports from The Moscow Times and Radio Free Europe. – AK, O

Following the end of the national contests in September and October of this year, the 2023 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments has come to its crucial final phase, and it’s now waiting for the international winners to be publicly announced. Historically, the annual photographic competition organized worldwide by the Wikipedia community has involved dozens of countries across the globe and gifted Wikimedia projects with hundreds of thousands of photos each year; 2023 has made no exception, as users from at least 46 different nations uploaded more than 217,000 images.^[1] 2,343 photos became quality images, 46 were assessed as featured pictures, and two received the valued image treatment.

Five countries made their debut in this year’s competition: Egypt, Togo, Uzbekistan, Zambia and the Dutch special municipality of Sint Eustatius. On the other hand, four nations – Belgium, Georgia, Greece and the United States – came back to the party after more or less prolonged hiatus.

Taking a look at the statistics,^[2] Italy recorded the highest number of uploaded images by a mile, with 52,004 contributions; to put it in context, that’s almost twice as much as second-placed Russia (28,761), and almost thrice as much as third-placed Ukraine (19,641), as well as a huge jump from the previous performances of the Bel Paese itself. Brazil was the highest-ranked, non-European country on the list, coming in fifth place with 13,202 contributions, right above the United Kingdom (12,851); elsewhere, India led the Asian continent from their 10th place (5,754 images), while Nigeria was the first of the African countries in 17th place (2,800), slightly outperforming the US (2,513).

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Italy also topped the chart for the total number of uploaders (946, 565 of whom signed up to Commons during the competition), with Russia (557, 406 of whom registered) and Iran (459, 391 of whom registered) following at moderate distance. It is surprising, however, to see Uganda boast the highest percentage of images that were used in the wikis after being uploaded (about 85%), a feat Egypt (61%) and Malta (44%) are not even close to, despite being on the podium.

Most of the countries involved in Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 have already elected their national winners and/or selected their ten best submissions for the international stage: you can see a comprehensive gallery here.^[3] Just like last year, Italy's committee has once again stood out for their decision to “kill two birds with one stone”, by hosting a traditional contest alongside one that was centered around a specific category of monuments, which in this case turned out to be religious buildings; you can see the winners and finalists of the Italian contest in detail here or here. Now, all we have to do is wait for the announcement of the international winners: let’s see which pictures will make our jaws drop this year! – O

• Annual reports: Whose Knowledge?, Wikimedia Community User Group Malta, Wiki Movement Brazil User Group.
• Your Wikipedia year in review: A new online tool by User:Jdlrobson allows editors to "look back at all the good work you have been doing this year in helping build the best place on the Internet!", based on their edit history and thanks/thanked log. (A somewhat related feature, focusing on contributions from the last 60 days instead of the last year, was recently integrated into Wikipedia's user interface itself at Special:Impact, see last month's coverage.)
• New administrator: The Signpost welcomes the English Wikipedia's newest administrator, Clovermoss. Her RfA passed on 20 December with 218 in support, 5 opposed, 4 neutral.
• Articles for Improvement: This week's Article for Improvement is Online encyclopedia. Please be bold in helping improve this article! Up next, starting from December 25, will be Carbon source (biology).

This article was originally published in the Russian Wikinews on December 20, 2023. We thank Ymblanter for help with the translation.

On December 19, 2023, the director of Wikimedia Russia, Stanislav Kozlovsky, made several important statements about his forced resignation from his job at the Moscow State University and the dissolution of the WMF's Russian branch.

Kozlovsky had been working at the Moscow State University for 25 years, where he most recently served as a Candidate of Psychological Sciences and Associate Professor at the Faculty of Psychology. In December 2023, he was at the University's branch in Baku, Azerbaijan, giving lectures on psychophysiology to local students, when he was "unexpectedly" forced to interrupt the course, having been called to Moscow by order of the vice-rector of the MSU due to "operational necessity".

On December 18, 2023, during a meeting at the dean's office of the MSU's Faculty of Psychology, Kozlovsky was told that there existed "reliable information" about his inclusion in the list of suspected foreign agents by Russian authorities [since lists of foreign agents are updated on Fridays, his inclusion on the list was expected to be made public on December 22, 2023]. According to Kozlovsky himself, he was offered two options by the MSU's board: either be fired for "absenteeism", or to resign "at his own request"; having been denied further time to think about his future at the university, he ultimately "chose the latter [option]". Later on the same day, Kozlovsky removed information about his place of work from his Wikipedia user page.

However, TASS later reported about a press statement by the MSU's Faculty of Psychology itself regarding the events associated with Kozlovsky’s dismissal, in which the office denied his version of the facts, while also claiming that neither the university, nor the faculty knew anything "on the inclusion of S. A. Kozlovsky in any lists".

On the evening of December 18, Kozlovsky called an emergency meeting of Wikimedia RU's NP members, where he reported his forced resignation from his job at the MSU. As he later said, in an interview with RBK, the Wikimedia RU administrators agreed that "it [was] impossible to work in such conditions" and "decided to dissolve the organization", although the "closing formalities [would] take several months". After this was reported on the Russian Wikipedia's Village Pump, users expressed understanding and many found some words in support.

At 07:38, December 19, 2023 (UTC), Kozlovsky posted on the Russian Wikipedia news forum with a story about the events described. He also gave several interviews to Russian media, including TASS, RBC, RTVI, and Vzglyad. He said that Wikimedia RU has never been responsible for Wikipedia. Instead, it supported Wikiprojects in Russian (those, along with Wikipedia, include Wiktionary, Wikinews, Wikisource, and others). It prepared textbooks and offered online courses on editing these projects, organized conferences, seminars, and lectures, and worked with copyright holders to facilitate transfer of works to Wikipedia under free licenses. According to him, in recent years, "everyone has become afraid" of dealing with Wikimedia RU, although there has been no obvious pressure on the organization until now.

In an interview with another publication, the business newspaper Vzglyad, Stanislav said that he does not intend to leave Russia. "I do not have anywhere to go."

Kozlovsky was also not sure about what exactly was the reason for the possible inclusion of foreign agents on the list. Since he gave lectures in Baku, Kozlovsky joked: "Maybe they want to recognize me as a foreign agent of Azerbaijan? I don't know".

In addition, Kozlovsky recalled that there has been discussion about blocking Wikipedia for more than ten years, but it has never happened: "It [the blocking] could happen any day, but it doesn’t happen. I hope this never happens."

• Evgenia Lepekhina; Elena Lepekhina (December 19, 2023). "Проект поддержки русскоязычной «Википедии» объявил о закрытии" [The project supporting Russian-language Wikipedia announced its closure]. RTVI.
• Alexey Degtyarev (December 19, 2023). "Российское сообщество поддержки «Википедии» решили закрыть" [[They] decided to close the Russian support community of Wikipedia]. Vzglyad.
• Kirill Sokolov; Margarita Ovsyannikova (December 19, 2023). "Сообщество российской «Википедии» решило прекратить работу" [The Russian Wikipedia community has decided to shut itself down]. RBK.ru. RBK Group.
• "Викимедиа РУ закрывается" [Wikimedia RU is closing]. Russian Wikipedia (discussion at the community "News" forum). 20 December 2023.
• "В России закроют сообщество поддержки русскоязычной «Википедии»" [The support community for Russian-language Wikipedia will be closed in Russia]. TASS. December 19, 2023.
• "В МГУ сообщили об увольнении директора «Викимедиа.ру» из вуза по собственному желаниюs" [MSU announced the dismissal of the director of Wikimedia.ru from the university at his own request]. TASS. December 19, 2023.

• Q: How do you                   a                  ?

A: First you                          ... then you                         .

• Q: But what do you do with the            ?

A: Why the hell did you                                                                                          ?