The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited; Wikipedia still failing to fail; brief news

A recent interview has shed new light on the 2002 fork of the Spanish Wikipedia and the influence it may have had on the development of Wikipedia as a whole, and ignited a controversy between Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales about the stance on advertising in the early phase of the project.

Edgar Enyedy, an early activist on the Spanish Wikipedia who describes himself as "some sort of unofficial leader together with Javier de la Cueva" of the fork Enciclopedia Libre Universal en Español, was interviewed by Nathaniel Tkacz of the "Critical Point of View" (CPOV) Wikipedia research initiative, on whose blog the interview was first published on January 15 ("‘Good luck with your WikiPAIDia’: Reflections on the 2002 Fork of the Spanish Wikipedia". See also the recent Signpost interview with Tkacz and fellow CPOV member Johanna Niesyto).

Concerns about possible plans to use advertising on Wikipedia are often named as the main reason for the fork. Enyedy confirmed that remarks about ads in a February 2002 announcement by Larry Sanger triggered the exodus of the Spanish Wikipedians ("Bomis might well start selling ads on Wikipedia sometime within the next few months, and revenue from those ads might make it possible for me to come back to my old job"), but insisted that several other issues played an important role, including concerns about the insufficiently international nature of Wikipedia - an "American shadow [that] marked the first point of contention between myself and Sanger and Wales." As examples, he named the fact that "the basic pages ('what Wikipedia is not', 'be bold', 'how to start', 'sandbox', etc) were all in English; we had the American logo in English and so on", but also referred to issues that are in some form still relevant today, such as the internationalization of the interface: "The software, for example, was not translated at all and it cast an English (language) shadow over the entire project", and cultural differences between Europe and the US regarding sexual images ("Former AOL users used to remind me that explicit biology images are widely accepted among us, but would be considered inappropriate on the American version"). The Spanish Wikipedians also differed from their English counterpart by introducing a stylebook, and an index based on the Universal Decimal Classification.

A main reason for the fork was objections to the leadership of Wikipedia's chief organizer Larry Sanger:

Also contributing to the decision to fork was a distrust of Jimmy Wales' intentions, who to Enyedy seemed reluctant to steer Wikipedia into a non-profit direction.

Asked by Tkacz how the right to fork (granted in principle by the Wikipedia's free license) looked in detail in this case, Enyedy said that the activists had to download and transfer the articles one by one. (The accessibility of timely Wikipedia dumps continues to be a point of debate today.)

Enyedy said that the Enciclopedia Libre, while still active today, "was not intended to last. It was merely a form of pressure. Some of the goals were achieved, not all of them, but it was worth the cost", and emphasized its continuing influence:

According to Tkacz, Enyedy said "that he has been approached several times a year since 2002, but has never shared his story because the people contacting him were either mainstream journalists or people from wikimedia and he wasn't convinced they would let him tell his version of the story".

The abstract of a talk about the fork given at Wikimania 2005 also mentions issues that led to its creation.

On January 20, Wired UK published an abbreviated version of the interview ("The Spanish Fork: Wikipedia's ad-fuelled mutiny"), which included reactions by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger.

Sanger objected sharply to Enyedy's statements, saying that "the only sort of person who could seriously describe my role as an Orwellian "Big Brother" is a radical anarchist, for whom even the slightest possible exercise of authority is outrageous oppression. To be sure, Wikipedia had quite a few of such vocal characters in its early days. The story has not yet been fully told just how they essentially took over with the blessing of Jimmy Wales". But Sanger agreed that the fork "might well have been the straw that finally tipped the scales in favor of a 100% ad-free Wikipedia."

Jimmy Wales issued a much shorter statement:

Sanger objected even more sharply to Wales' statement, questioning the veracity of the first sentence, first on Twitter ("He was long in favor; I long opposed. Apologize, pls!"), then on his personal blog, recalling or citing various statements by Wales about ads from 2000 to 2002 ("From the beginning, Wales let me know in no uncertain terms that, once it garnered enough traffic, Nupedia would become ad-supported"). Sanger said that in December 2001 (when all other Bomis employees had to be laid off and his own position appeared to hinge on possible advertising revenue), he "was still uncomfortable with the idea of ads being run to support me, even in a non-profit context". The discussion then continued on Jimmy Wales' user talk page, where Wales said that "I don't see what the discrepancy is supposed to be", and Sanger accused him of lying.

In December 2005, US law professor Eric Goldman (User:Ericgoldman) bet his friend Mike Godwin (later to become Wikimedia's General Counsel) that within five years "Wikipedia inevitably will be overtaken by the gamers and the marketers to the point where it will lose all credibility", if it would not give up its open editing model. ("Wikipedia Will Fail Within 5 Years", Eric Goldman's blog). Godwin predicted that anonymous editing would still be possible, even though "I think part of the design of Wikipedia was to allow for the evolution of contributor standards, even though as a 'foundational' principle anonymous contributors will always be allowed to edit it. Such evolution ought to be enough to keep Wikipedia alive and vital in the face of a changing digital environment." ("Will Wikipedia Fail in Five Years?", Godwinslaw.org). In 2006, Goldman reiterated his prediction for 2010 (Signpost coverage).

The bet was to be decided on December 2, 2010. On January 14, Goldman revisited the bet on his blog, admitting that "My 2005 Prediction of Wikipedia's Failure By 2010 Was Wrong". He identified the introduction of Nofollow on Wikipedia and anti-spam techniques developed by volunteers as the main reasons that Wikipedia is still able to resist spammers and marketers, but also noted other changes that he sees as "less salutary". While remaining somewhat skeptical about the sustainability of Wikipedia's model (citing his 2009 article "Wikipedia's Labor Squeeze and its Consequences", cf. Signpost coverage), Goldman (who is also a participant in the Foundation's Public Policy Initiative) praised the usefulness of the site: "I visit it daily as part of satisfying my intellectual curiosity. Happy 10th anniversary, Wikipedia!"

In a recent blog post ("Wikipedia is not a place for promotion"), Wikipedia researcher Felipe Ortega (whose statistics on Wikipedia editing frequencies had started debates about Wikipedia's sustainability in 2009) voiced concerns similar to Goldman's, identifying "conflicts around self-promotion in Wikipedia" as one of the "main challenges for Wikipedia over the next 10 years".

• Turkish Wikipedia lacks academic contributors: Today's Zaman reports that "Wikipedia in Turkish still faces many problems despite the fact that it is a fast-growing site, which its contributors say has come a long way since it was first founded in 2004." The English-language Turkish newspaper consulted "Vikipedists" on the project's "Village Fountain" (the equivalent of English Wikipedia's Village Pump"), and found that the community members "unanimously complain that experts that specialize in particular fields, particularly members of academia, are unwilling to contribute to the encyclopedia for free", which Today's Zaman contrasted with situation on the English Wikipedia. The Turkish Vikipedists said that their experience "shows that an overwhelming majority of those who contribute to Vikipedi are students. ... In the experience of at least two Turkish Vikipedists many academics that have been invited to participate in the project have declined after finding out that they will not get paid for their contributions."
• BBC World Service discusses Wikipedia: Jimmy Wales spoke to the BBC World Service's Digital Planet programme while in London marking Wikipedia's 10th anniversary on a range of subjects including collaboration with the British Museum and the future of Wikipedia. He also spoke about the demographics of Wikipedia editors, stating the need to attract more female editors. The rest of the interview can be heard here. The Digital Planet hosts also discussed Wikipedia's funding model and the problems Wikipedia has faced, with contributor Bill Thompson noting his article had once been vandalised to falsely claim he had died.
• Wikipedia as an agent of change in the developing world: A fashion shot of Jimmy Wales was one of the two cover motives of the Italian men's Vogue this month (the other one featuring singer Usher). In the accompanying interview, Wales said Wikipedia's biggest growth potential was in the languages of the developing world – particularly India and Africa. Wales also sees Wikipedia as an agent of change in non-English-speaking developing countries which lacked access to basic information freely available in the Western world. He is confident that the democratisation of the developing world through technologies such as iPad-like tablets will accelerate within two years, when he predicts such machines will become affordable. He hoped access to information will reduce their vulnerability when the general public can upload information and also gain access to information Westerners take for granted. "With entries, Wikipedia in Swahili is already solid for that region, but we're only at the beginning. I'm really excited about this direction. I'm confident that we will have a great impact from the moment that people there start having basic information- when they start understanding and reflecting on their own government, on the governments of neighboring countries".
• Wikipedia vandalism a past news fad: Pocket-lint.com published a long interview with Jimmy Wales ("Wikipedian Jimmy Wales talks favourites, faults and the future"). Among other things, Wales argued that treating vandalism edits on Wikipedia as newsworthy had been a "fad" in the media which had passed away. "If there’s vandalism now, I don’t hear about it [from reporters]. It’s usually checked very quickly and I think we’ve got better than that. If it does get reported on, these days we just roll our eyes and say ‘so what, it got fixed in a minute’."
• Wikipedia makes "the ordinary person the expert": In a column about Wikipedia for the Indian Express, Nishant Shah from the Bangalore-based Centre for Internet and Society stated that "Wiki changes the world", by "making the ordinary person the expert and knowledge free."
• The past year for Wikimedia in India: The Bangalore Mirror interviewed administrator Tinucherian ("Bangalore’s the place for Wiki"); including a look back at 2010, which Tinucherian said "was quite a year for Wikimedia in India".
• How to "secure a Wikipedia article about your business": Entrepreneur.com has published a blog post listing "Do's and Don'ts of Featuring Your Business in Wikipedia", mentioning the demographics of Wikipedia's readership and the importance of knowing its policies and guidelines, and concluding: "Getting an article published on Wikipedia is pretty heady stuff. It can be casually brought into any conversation you're having with friends, peers and potential customers. Think of it: A slight wave of the hand at the end of a pitch and a casual aside where you say, 'Yeah, actually you can find all that stuff on our Wikipedia entry.'"
• Name suppression on Wikipedia: The New Zealand Herald reports that after a court had ordered the suppression of the name of a celebrity who had been arrested last month following a row with his wife, "the celebrity's Wikipedia page has [...] been altered at least seven times [...] in an apparent battle between internet users trying to reveal his identity. Each time the information is added, it is deleted."
• UK parliament COI editing awards: Earlier this month, Briton Tom Scott announced the "2010 'Editing Wikipedia From Inside Parliament' Awards", to edits selected from the anonymous contributions of 194.60.38.198 and 194.60.38.10, two IP addresses over which users at the UK Houses of Parliament are known to access the Internet. They include the "'Sweeping Things Under The Carpet' Award" and the "'Did Someone Bring Their Kid To Work?' Award". (Related Signpost coverage: "British politicians accused of WP cover-ups")
• First UK Wikipedia student society planned: There are plans underway "to found an Imperial College Wikipedia Society – the first student Wikipedia society in the UK – by the end of February", as reported by the "Reporter", a community newspaper at Imperial College.
  
  Reader comments
  

2011-01-24

Wikipedians celebrate anniversary with US National Archives in Washington, D.C.

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Aude

Signpost writer Aude has been one of the organizers of the WikiXDC event and is also involved in the FedFlix digitization project at NARA.

On Saturday, January 22, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) hosted Wikipedians in Washington, D.C. for WikiXDC, to celebrate Wikipedia's 10th birthday. Approximately 80-90 people attended, including NARA staff, numerous experienced Wikipedians, as well as new editors and Wikipedia readers and fans.

The morning included a welcome by US Archivist David Ferriero, presentations by NARA staff talking about records management and various other aspects of what they do, and a behind-the-scenes tour. During the welcome, James Hare brought up the idea of the Wikimedia DC group bidding for Wikimania 2012, with warm reception to the idea including from Ferriero. NARA's Beth Cron gave an overview of their records management process, and as a case study, Martha Murphy discussed NARA's collections on the John F. Kennedy assassination and examined the Wikipedia article on the topic. Kitty Nicholson gave a talk on record conservation. Jill Reilly James discussed work on improving the search functionality for finding records, and demonstrated a new search prototype. She also talked about digitization efforts. Currently, there are approximately 153,000 items digitized and available online, out of millions of cubic square feet worth of boxes. They are interested in increasing the priority of digitization to improve public access. NARA also talked about their interest in working with Wikipedia volunteers, and facilitating easier access to NARA records. At some point, they would like to have a Wikipedian-in-Residence working with them.

The afternoon featured lightning talks by Wikipedians and others, with the first session of the afternoon focusing on GLAM-Wiki topics. Thomas Gideon presented about the FedFlix and International Amateur Scanning League project for digitizing video from the National Archives holdings (see also the WikiProject FedFlix). Ed Summers presented on his Linkypedia tool for tracking outgoing links from Wikipedia to other websites. Harihar Shankar spoke about the Memento plugin for Firefox that helps access Wikipedia and other sites as they were at some date in the past. Sarah Stierch talked about Wikipedia:WikiProject Public art and her work on documenting public art around Washington, D.C.., sparking a good deal of interest from the audience to help photograph and map the artwork. Peter Meyer, a statistician at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, presented on Statipedia.

The second session of lightning talks focused on Wikipedia, more generally. Kat Walsh looked back at 10 moments in Wikipedia history, and User:Jyothis talked about the Malayalam Wikipedia and discussed about Indian language versions of Wikipedia. Sage Ross and PJ Tabit presented about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program and the role of Campus Ambassadors, discussing how it has worked so far and how they would like to see ideas translate to GLAM outreach efforts. User:Aude gave a brief overview of the collaboration between Wikimedians in DC and the Smithsonian Institution, including work with the Smithsonian American Art Museum and the Archives of American Art.

The day wrapped up with celebration of Wikipedia's 10th birthday, featuring Wikipedia cupcakes donated by Georgetown Cupcake, followed by a session of Wiki-Trivia led by Kat Walsh and Phoebe Ayers. Socializing continued afterwards at a nearby pub, with discussion about Wikimedia DC's bid for Wikimania 2012 and moving forward with forming a chapter.

• http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiXDC
• http://inkdroid.org/journal/2011/01/23/wikixdc/
• http://twitter.com/#!/USNatArchives

Reader comments

2011-01-24

Life Inside the Beltway

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Mabeenot

WikiProject news

News in brief

• This is the last full week to participate in the January Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive. They've reached their overall copyedit goal, but they still need a lot of help with tags dating back to 2009.
• The ambitious WikiProject Oregon Collaborations are members of the 76th Oregon Legislative Assembly and newly-elected mayors of Oregon cities.
• Check out the new Turtles Portal!
• WikiProject United States has reactivated their Collaboration of the Month and voting has started on the February collaboration.
• Earn a barnstar by participating in WikiProject Wikify's February 2011 drive, aiming to bring the number of {{wikify}} and {{Dead end}} tags down to 18,000 and clear the 2008 backlog.

Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the Signpost's WikiProject Desk.

This week, we visited WikiProject District of Columbia which covers Washington D.C., the capital district of the United States and home to over 600,000 residents (more than the entire state of Wyoming). The project began in April 2007 and has grown to include 23 pieces of featured content and 44 good and A-class articles. WPDC is also home to a collection of featured and valued pictures. Members contribute to the Washington D.C. Portal and, because of the national importance of many monuments and institutions within the District, frequently see their content on the United States Portal.

We interviewed four members of WikiProject DC. epicAdam lives and works in the District. His general interest in his hometown's history and culture motivated him to help bring the main Washington D.C. article up to featured article status. Missvain lives in the Logan Circle neighborhood of the District and has made it her goal to document all public art in DC as part of WikiProject Public Art. She made a presentation at last weekend's WikiXdc event. Kumioko lives in Virginia but works in DC and is interested in the history of the area. SchuminWeb is an admin who lives in suburban Maryland, but works and spends much of his time in the District. He founded WikiProject Washington Metro and did most of the writing for October Rebellion and Fraser Mansion, bringing both of them up to Good Article status.

What kind of DC articles do you typically focus on?

epicAdam: I work mostly on aspects of history, politics, culture, and transportation that relate to the city as a place, not just as the capital of the United States.

SchuminWeb: I work on a lot of public transportation articles, as well as a few pockets here and there of DC-related stuff.

Kumioko: I work primarily on biographies but lately I have been working in a wide array of areas trying to clean up and build up the articles relating the DC and the United States in general.

Missvain: The majority of my work revolves around public art in Washington and the stories behind them.

Does the District's prominence as a tourism destination help or hinder the project's efforts to provide good photography with each article?

epicAdam: It both helps and hinders. It is certainly a help when it comes to finding pictures of the National Mall, federal buildings, museums, monuments, etc. However, those areas comprise only a very small portion of the city, which leaves much of the city un-photographed. In addition, there are many images of the same location which gives variety in artistry, but a small range of options in terms of photo content that can actually be used in the article.

SchuminWeb: For those areas that are touristy, sure, the tourist traffic could only help in getting photos. However, for much of the city, one wouldn't really venture over some of those ways as a tourist. That is where it's more like any other city, in that you're going to have someone local do the photographing because they're familiar with it.

Missvain: No problem for me. I have a photography background and feel comfortable fighting the crowds, luckily, that's rarely a problem for me. I do not have a car though, so, I have to often rent one to get to some of the places I document.

How far does the project's scope extend? Are neighboring areas of Virginia and Maryland included in the project?

epicAdam: The general consensus has been to restrict the project's scope to the District of Columbia itself and I agree with that approach. Clearly, there are certain people, places and things in Maryland and Virginia that are essential to the understanding of the District and therefore can be included within the WikiProject DC's scope. However, the vast majority of content associated with Maryland and Virginia can be best covered by their own respective WikiProjects.

Kumioko: I agree, although it might be a possibility in the future to create a project or task force that covers the entire metro area. I think its best to leave DC with DC things. A couple exceptions I could think of might be the Pentagon and Arlington Cemetery but for the most part the scope is fine as it is.

Does the project collaborate with any other projects that share a DC basis?

Kumioko: I have seen collaboration between Washington Metro, United States, Virginia and Maryland but that's about all I can think of. There are projects for the Smithsonian Institution and Library of Congress that could and will play a role in the DC project.

Missvain: I do write articles about Smithsonian objects and the basis for my project revolves around the SIRIS database documentation of sculptures the Smithsonian did in the 90s. I am hoping to get more involved in the GLAM projects.

There has been some discussion about consolidating WikiProject DC's assessment and tagging functions with WikiProject United States. How will this affect the project? Do you foresee similar integration occurring between WikiProject US and the projects covering each of the 50 states?

Kumioko: WikiProject DC has already been added to {{WikiProject United States}}, the {{WikiProject District of Columbia}} replaced with the WPUS/DC banner and displayed prominently at the top of the WPUS landing page. This was done for several reasons after consulting the other members of the DC project and after discussing the issue on the projects talk page. With that said, WikiProject District of Columbia is its own project and runs autonomously from WPUS. The two projects are not merged nor does DC fall "under" US. It just shares the banner template and WPUS helps support it because it has a much bigger pool of members.

SchuminWeb: I originally was wary about the idea, but then was assured that the DC project pages would not be merged out of existence, since a big entire-US project talk page would be way too large to handle. If adding some structure above the DC-level project gets more eyes on the articles and leads to great improvements, then that's probably a good thing. DC would seem to be a good testing ground for this, since it is a project with a smaller scope, and if it works well for the DC project, one would think that it would work for the other state WikiProjects.

epicAdam: I am rather against combining WikiProject DC with WikiProject United States. To do so continues a misguided notion that the only reason the District is important is because of its status as the nation's capital. It has been my focus to reveal Washington as a city with real people who live and work here, many of whom have no connection to the federal government whatsoever. In my mind, WikiProject United States is so broad in scope that to try and integrate local WikiProjects under its purview would be a useless effort.

Next week, we'll follow clans of feral cats into battle. Until then, read previous issues of the Report in the archive.

Reader comments

2011-01-24

The best of the week

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Tony1 and Dabomb87

This week's "Features and admins" covers Saturday 15 – Friday 21 January (UTC)

New administrators

The Signpost welcomes Gimme danger (nom) as our newest admin. Danger has been editing for four and a half years and has participated in many Wikipedia tasks. Among these are the help desks, speedy deletions, backlogs, and assisting new editors' contributions; an example of Danger's larger achievements is the clearing of WikiProject Wisconsin's assessment backlog of some 5,000 articles. Danger self-describes as "fundamentally a gnome".

Featured articles

Thirteen articles were promoted to featured status:

• Ariel (moon) (nom), the brightest of the 27 known moons of Uranus, discovered in 1851 and named for a sky spirit in Alexander Pope's The Rape of the Lock and Shakespeare's The Tempest. Almost all knowledge of Ariel comes from a single fly-by of Uranus performed by the spacecraft Voyager 2 in 1986; however, it managed to image only 35% of the moon's surface (nominated by Ruslik0 and Serendipodous). Picture at right
• Interstate 80 Business (West Wendover, Nevada – Wendover, Utah) (nom), a highway with historical significance, and which is the main street between those twinned cities on the Nevada–Utah border (Admrboltz).
• Windsor Castle (nom), one of the best known castles in England, with a fascinating political, social, and architectural history (Hchc2009).
• Maya stelae (nom), stone monuments fashioned in the Classic Period Maya culture that are remarkable for their stylistic variety (Simon Burchell).
• Fantastic (magazine) (nom), probably the only magazine launched as a result of the Korean War, it lasted for 28 years, making it one of the more durable science fiction and fantasy magazines, and was instrumental in popularising the "sword and sorcery" genre (Mike Christie).
• Japanese aircraft carrier Hōshō (nom), commissioned in 1922, was the world's first commissioned ship designed and built as an aircraft carrier, and the first aircraft carrier of the Imperial Japanese Navy (Cla68).
• Section 116 of the Australian Constitution (nom), about a provision of the Australian Constitution that sets uncertain boundaries for establishing any religion, imposing religious observance, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion by the federal government; this clause has been judicially interpreted in a significantly narrower way than a similar provision in the US Consitution (Mkativerata).
• Bombing of Singapore (1944–1945) (nom), the US and British air raids on the Japanese-occupied island during 1944 and 1945 (Nick-D). Picture at right
• SMS Rheinland (nom), the third German dreadnought-type battleship built for the Imperial Navy (Parsecboy).
• Battle of Sio (nom), a minor battle, but one of a series that nominator Hawkeye7 hopes to assemble into a featured topic on the New Guinea campaign.
• Almirante Latorre-class battleship (nom), another article in The ed17's South American battleship series, this one tells the tortured tale of two Chilean ships ordered during the 1907–14 dreadnought arms race.
• Pennatomys (nom), the "snowy winged mouse", an extinct Carribean rodent (Ucucha).
• Adenanthos obovatus (nom), from the Southwestern Australian floristic region, which has more flowering plants than Europe and Asia put together (Casliber and Hesperian). Picture at right

Featured lists

Seven lists were promoted:

• Nashville Vols all-time roster (nom) (nominated by NatureBoyMD)
• List of signs and symptoms of diving disorders (nom) (RexxS).
• List of National Treasures of Japan (crafts: others) (nom) (Bamse). Picture at right
• Philadelphia Phillies all-time roster (C) (nom) (Killervogel5).
• Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation (nom) (PresN).
• List of unreleased Britney Spears songs (nom) (Xwomanizerx).
• Shooting thaler (nom) (RHM22).

Four featured lists were delisted:

• Timeline of discovery of Solar System planets and their moons (nom: accessibility, style, referencing)
• Girls Aloud discography (nom: verifiability, lead, sourcing, formatting, accessibility)
• List of former municipalities of Norway (nom: lead, prose, referencing)
• Aesop Rock discography (nom: lead, referencing)

Featured pictures

Seven images were promoted; each can be viewed in medium size by clicking on "nom":

• Eilean Donan Castle (nom; related article) in north-west Scotland, originally built in the early 13th century as a defence against the Vikings and restored between 1919 and 1932, including the construction of an arched bridge for easier access. Creator Diliff recently "managed a trip up to Skye in Scotland and was spoilt by the lighting as I passed this castle". The nomination received unanimous support from 17 reviewers. Picture at top
• Blue-winged Parrot (nom; related article), typically 20 cm long and found in Tasmania and southeast Australia. It is found in savannah woodland, grasslands, orchards, farmlands, marshes, heath, dunes, and other open habitats up to 1200 m (created by Noodle snacks).
• Black-headed Honeyeater (nom; related article), a bird endemic to Tasmania, first described in 1839. It often hangs upside down from branches while foraging (created by Noodle snacks).
• Red-capped Plover (breeding plumage) (nom; related article), widespread in Australia and a vagrant to New Zealand, it eats mainly small invertebrates, especially molluscs, crustaceans and worms (created by Noodle snacks).
• Mantra-Rock Dance poster (nom; related article), for a concert held in 1967 at the San Francisco Avalon Ballroom (created by Harvey Wallace Cohen).
• Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola (nom; related article), a human looking at the Earth from space (created by NASA/Douglas H. Wheelock). Picture at bottom
• Henry Compton (nom; related article), a portrait by Godfrey Kneller of the man who was Bishop of Oxford 1674–76 and Bishop of London 1675–1713 (created by Godfrey Kneller).

Featured sounds

Bright College Years

A recording of the 2006 Yale Whiffenpoofs singing Bright College Years

---

Problems playing this file? See media help.

One sound file was promoted: Bright College Years (nom and link to related article), a performance of the first and third verses of Yale's unofficial alma mater by the 2006 Yale Whiffenpoofs. It is the first choral a cappella performance to reach featured sound status.

Information about new admins at the top is drawn from their user pages and RfA texts, and occasionally from what they tell us directly.

Reader comments

2011-01-24

23 editors submit evidence in Shakespeare case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Ohconfucius, Ncmvocalist, and Tony1

Two cases are currently open. The Committee opened or closed no cases during the week.

Open cases

Shakespeare authorship question (Week 2)

This week, 23 editors submitted in excess of 12,000 words (~103kb) in on-wiki evidence. A workshop proposal was also submitted by one of these editors. As reported last week, the amended deadline for evidence submissions is 30 January 2011.

Longevity (Week 9)

Evidence submissions closed on 15 January 2011. One party added 66kb to his analysis of evidence (see Signpost coverage from 17 January 2011). Drafter Kirill Lokshin has not yet submitted a proposed decision on-wiki for arbitrators to vote on.

Other matters

The Committee conditionally suspended the indefinite block of SanchiTachi (talk · contribs). The conditions are such that SanchiTachi is:

• subject to a 1RR restriction, and
• warned to avoid certain types of commentary.

The information reflects the state of cases at the time of publication.

Reader comments

2011-01-24

File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Jarry1250

File licensing metadata support on the way

On Wikimedia wikis, most important information about files (such as author and copyright information) is buried within the file description page itself, and is difficult for automated tools to extract. Last week, a new development project aiming to separate elements of that data into a separate database table, and exposing it via the MediaWiki API, was announced (wikitech-l mailing list). Developer Bryan Tong Minh described the project:

“

As you may have noticed [from the coverage of the Dutch Hack-a-ton], Roan, Krinkle and I have started to integrate more tightly image licensing within MediaWiki. Our aim is to create a system where it should be easy to obtain the basic copyright information of an image in a machine readable format, as well as querying images with a certain copyright state (all images copyrighted by User:XY, all images licensed CC-BY-SA, etc). At this moment we only intend to store author and license information, but nothing stops us from expanding this in the future.

”

Technical issues were discussed on the mailing list, as was the possibility of expanding the scheme into extracting other forms of data from pages, on a par with Semantic MediaWiki. Michael Dale suggested that it could be discussed at the forthcoming Data Summit. In the mean time, contribution on the current project talkpage was requested.

"Indisputable improvement" in multimedia uploading

Also last week, the Multimedia Usability project published a report about its achievements. The project, funded by a $300,000 grant from the Ford Foundation from October 2009 to November 2010, created the new "upload wizard" and a cartoon-based licensing tutorial (see previous Signpost coverage). With these in place, the report heralded an "indisputable improvement" in users' experiences of the upload process:

“

The project's goal was to increase multimedia participation on Wikimedia websites. The main means chosen to reach this goal was to facilitate the upload process to Wikimedia Commons, the central media repository for Wikimedia sites... A usability study was conducted by an independent firm, who compared the existing and new upload systems. Their results showed an indisputable improvement of the users' experience. Long-term impact of the project is still to be assessed. The Wikimedia Foundation indicated its intention to continue to improve the upload system beyond this project, and to support volunteers worldwide who share multimedia files on Wikimedia Commons.

”

In brief

Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.

• Wikimedia Germany (WMDE) has decided not to hold a developer meetup around its international Chapters' conference in March (as it had done last year), but will instead run a hackathon in May, in addition to the combination of technology presentations and programming sessions available at Wikimania 2011 in August (wikitech-l mailing list).
• Developer Magnus Manske posted a series of updates on how his WYSIFTW editing tool: development is progressing, but at the cost of processing time, particularly on older browsers, though even this is being improved rapidly (wikitech-l mailing list, see also previous Signpost coverage for context).
• Ryan Lane noted that his integration of OpenStack - software which allows users to test their code changes on various browser/operating system configurations without actually possessing them - into MediaWiki has been successful in generating an alpha-release extension (wikitech-l mailing list).
• The JSMin JavaScript compressor has been retired in favour of more free alternative compressors after it was determined that JSMin's condition that it "be used for Good, not Evil" rendered it incompatible with MediaWiki's General Public License (GPL), which does not restrict reuse in any way (wikitech-l mailing list).
• WMF developer Robert Lanphier posted a report into the revisions that still need to be reviewed before the release of MediaWiki version 1.17 (wikitech-l mailing list).
• Single user login (SUL) was broken briefly on Saturday as the result of developer error. The problem is in the process of being fixed permanently (wikitech-l mailing list).
• A job opening for an Operations Engineer has been posted. The position reports to the (recently hired) Director of Operations, and is tasked with "designing, developing and optimizing the technical infrastructure and operations of the Wikimedia Foundation projects and maintaining the security, scalability and availability of the web properties".
  
  Reader comments
  

If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.

Keep up with The Signpost on Twitter, Facebook or Mastodon.

Home

About

Archives

Newsroom

Subscribe

Suggestions