Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news

Liam Wyatt (User:Witty lama) has become the sixth recipient of a Wikimedia fellowship, for a one-year project (until December 2011) where he "will be working to build the capacity of the Wikimedia community to undertake partnerships with cultural institutions – known as GLAMs [Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums] a term he popularized", according to the announcement by the Wikimedia Foundation's Human Resources Manager Daniel Phelps. A Wikipedian since 2005, Wyatt has been doing volunteer work in this area for two years. He convened the "GLAM-WIKI" conferences in Australia (2009, Signpost coverage), and the UK (2010, Signpost coverage), and a Wikipedia workshop at the "Museums and the Web 2010" conference (Signpost coverage). Also in 2010, he volunteered five weeks as "Wikipedian in Residence" at the British Museum, a pilot project to facilitate collaboration between Wikimedians and the institution (see Signpost coverage).

Witty lama, who is currently based in Sydney, has also been the Vice President of the Australian Wikimedia chapter, and one of the hosts of the "Wikipedia Weekly" podcast.

Through his blog post last November, entitled "How to make cultural collaborations scale?", concerns were voiced that "the sheer number of collaboration projects being offered to us" meant that many such opportunities would be irreparably wasted unless there was a "consistent, easily findable, and easy to understand processes for handling potential partnerships when they are presented to us". He added that we must put in place processes to "scale-up our capacity to professionally manage" collaborations, whilst being "consistent with the grassroots nature of Wikimedia projects."

Work on documenting such processes has now started on the Outreach wiki (with http://glamwiki.org/ as a shortcut), where a "WMF Fellow's to do list" has been developed since December 20. The page also features a "'This month in GLAM' report". Volunteers will be invited to collaborate on improving the "Guide to batch uploading" on Commons during the next one or two weeks. In February, Liam Wyatt will travel to India (like other WMF staff before him), meeting with Wikimedians in Mumbai, Bangalore and Delhi to explore collaboration possibilities with GLAM institutions there.

Watch for an interview with Liam in an upcoming issue of the Signpost.

A 3:43 minutes long video titled "The State of Wikipedia", narrated by Jimmy Wales and produced by Washington D.C. based creative agency JESS3, was published last week on video sharing sites and on http://www.thestateofwikipedia.com/, under a CC-BY-SA license. It illustrates the history of Wikipedia with colorful animated computer graphics (some stills), accompanied by quirky electronic music. On its inception, Wales said that "As a founder of Nupedia, I led the group to establish a farm team of sorts for future Nupedia articles. We used a new software platform to make collaboration easy - the wiki; Wikipedia." Wales also commented about his current role on Wikipedia and the importance of the Foundation ("I still lead the community, and the Wikimedia Foundation helps us to make Wikipedia what it is today"), and looked into the future: "There has never been anything like Wikipedia before, and its future horizon is very very long."

On the company's blog, Leslie Bradshaw and Becca Colbaugh from JESS3 explained that the video was "aimed at teaching the layperson Wikipedia’s initial concept and consequent evolution into becoming one of the most visited web sites across the globe", and that it had been developed over months together with the Foundation, as the company's gift to Wikipedia on its tenth anniversary. Wikipedian William Beutler (User:WWB) was involved in the project as an Executive Producer. On YouTube, the video had received almost 83,000 views at the time of writing.

• Public Policy project participants profiled: On the Wikimedia Foundation's official blog, "a series of profiles of students’ experiences on Wikipedia when participating in the Public Policy Initiative during the fall term" has started. The first two postings feature SoAuthentic from Syracuse University [1], who contributed significantly to the articles Cyber ShockWave and Homeland Security Act, and continued to edit after the end of term (one of his articles is currently nominated for deletion), and Cannondale0702 from Georgetown University, who wrote the article Obesity in the Middle East and North Africa[2].
• Wikimedia in Brazil: The Wikimedia Foundation's Head of Business Development Kul Wadhwa gave a presentation about Wikipedia at the Campus Party event in Brazil on January 21. It was followed by an editing competition with the main prize being the opportunity to shave the head of a Campus Party employee. Brazil is one of the countries of the "Global South" which are being explored for a possible expansion of the Foundation, after India.
• Wikimania scholarships: Harel Cain from Wikimedia Israel has reminded prospective attendants of this year's Wikimania in Haifa that the main scholarship application process for the event ends on January 31.
• IRC Office hours: Sue Gardner will resume her IRC office hours (a public chat) on January 27 at 18:00 UTC.

← Previous "News and notes"

Next "News and notes" →

In this issue

24 January 2011 (all comments)

News and notes

In the news

WikiXDC

WikiProject report

Features and admins

Arbitration report

Technology report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

• Feel free to revert me if I did wrong. --Elitre (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reverting, I can get it, I asked for it. Reverting in such a manner, no. The news about an article being deleted is now outdated, as the article was deleted. Plus, the very fact that an article (not the only one that was written by the user I guess) was going to be deleted or has been deleted does not say anything about the real experience of the guy, whether he/she is disappointed now, plans to leave, understood what was wrong and so on. But hey, thanks for reminding that I should lurk more and help less in some cases. --Elitre (talk) 11:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here I thanked you for your help fixing another story, right before you posted the above comment. I think your last comment and this edit summary are a bit unfortunate - your input is truly valued; you just can't expect people to agree with everything of it, especially if it consists of deleting what others wrote.

Signpost articles are not encyclopedia articles. They consists of news reporting and carry a date (and a byline), and feature expressions like "currently", so the concern about the statement being "outdated" is beside the point. I explained the revert in the edit summary. A main reason why Signpost articles should not be changed significantly after publication without a pressing need is that, like most newspaper articles, most readers will only read them once, soon after publication, and should not feel the need to check back for changes to get the full picture or the correct information. (Another is that articles are likely to be construed as expressions of the writers named in the byline, see also Wikipedia:Signpost/About.) And I do not understand your rationale for the deletion - the AfD was not mentioned to entice people to vote there, but to illustrate that this newbie's continued contributions after the course ended had not been without problems. Many megabytes of discussion have been written about the possible effects of AfDs on newbies. If you disagreed with the judgement that the AfD was newsworthy in this context, you would still have been welcome to rewrite the story before publication (possibly getting included in the byline), or to write up this news item yourself - check the Signpost Newsroom in the days before publication.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that your edit summary was unfortunate, being harsh for no reason, as I was the first one implying "I don't know the rules, you're free to revert my edit". Anyway I previously stated the reasons for my edit, but I guess I just can't expect people to agree with everything. --Elitre (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if it sounded harsh, it certainly wasn't meant to. I was just trying to explain the reasons for the revert (including one such rule, about changes after publication) in a concise way. Regards, HaeB (talk) 14:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It just had to be said: doesn't a "GLAM fellow" sound unbelievably gay? Lampman (talk) 11:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • LOL! --Elitre (talk) 11:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yep, it's an intentionally lighthearted (some would say silly) name, but ultimately it's just a shorthand way of saying "Cultural Partnerships Fellow". Personally, I hope David Bowie takes notice and edits Wikipedia as a result :-) Also, you might want to read the essay, Friends of gays should not be allowed to edit articles. Sincerely, Witty Lama 12:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Anything to brighten up the dark dusty corners of museums basements and gallery backrooms. They could use a little levity, a smack of color, heck, a boa. Ocaasi (talk) 07:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Well, as Jerry Seinfeld says: "Not that there's anything wrong with that." Lampman (talk) 10:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]