Article display preview: | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
|
Thanks, ChatGPT, we're bound to get some social media clickthroughs with a lead like that.
Anyway: Wikimedia Commons is a vast library of multimedia content, used to supplement articles on Wikipedia as well as other Wikimedia projects, with over 87 million media files ripe for the picking. But since its goal is to provide a repository of free content, suitable for use anywhere and by anyone, its inclusion criteria are far stricter than that on Wikipedia. Fair use rationales are verboten, for example, and fair use media is a no-go, no matter how high-importance or low-resolution it is.
Due to the wide range of subjects and topics covered on the site, there is a need for a large number of copyright guidance pages to ensure that the content is being used legally and appropriately. Additionally, many of the world's countries and territories have complex and unique legal systems, which can make determining copyright status difficult. To ensure that the content used on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects is legally sound, specific guidance pages are created for every conceivable location under which a work could be considered subject to copyright law. Some countries have freedom of panorama, and some don't. Some countries allow you to release things into the public domain, and some don't. And some countries are oppressive dictatorships, ruled with an iron fist by cartoon mice who have only permitted their subjects to watch public-domain talkies in 2023!
But we all know all about that stuff. Snore. Our mission today is to go boldly where no Signpost column has gone before: If there were two guys on the moon and one killed the other with a moon rock, would that be fucked up or what? And, more importantly: would it be subject to the Berne convention?
The vast library of Commons copyright guidance pages cover normal places, like France, Japan, Germany, China, and the United States. Okay, maybe "normal" is not the word to use here. You know what I mean.
The rest tends to fall into a few broad categories: fallen empires, disputed territories (oops! better drop some {{Ds/alert}} templates), and overseas dependencies of larger nations with strangely divergent legal systems; the last of which includes a startling number of uninhabited rocks in the middle of the ocean with special administrative status.
maybe work in "Extraterrestrial copyright: it's complicated" by the U.S. Library of Congress's Copyright Office – would cover at least astronaut photography at the Moon and low Earth orbit; and solar system bodies visited by U.S. robotic spacecraft including Mars, Jupiter and Saturn
Discuss this story
(This allows for greater visibility of discussions, makes archiving easier, and prevents discussions becoming disconnected from articles during the publication process)