On March 30, Board of Trustees member Victoria Doronina confirmed in a mailing list post that the Foundation has decided to permanently shut down the Wikinews project, one of Wikimedia's oldest projects. Starting on May 4, editing and new content creation will no longer be possible with all of the pages on the site locked in read-only mode.
The Italian version of Wikinews has reported that the WMF will issue a public statement on the project's closure on April 4, likely to elaborate more on the technical transition to read-only mode and the preservation of existing content, as anticipated by Doronina in her own post.
First launched in November 2004, following an online vote on Meta, Wikinews was an official Wikimedia project based on news reporting and citizen journalism, intended by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales as a way to write each story "as a news story, as opposed to an encyclopedia article". Despite its fair share of criticism about its compliance to a neutral point of view, Wikinews was also a platform for regular interviews with notable people including the likes of Shimon Peres, Tony Benn, Robert Cailliau, RuPaul and former WMF executive Sue Gardner. However, the project has always struggled to gain momentum in comparison to other Wikimedia portals throughout the years: at the time of this issue's publication, the platform is active in 31 languages, with just over 700 active editors across the board.
For this reason, following a public consultation, in November 2025 the Sister Projects Task Force (SPTF) advised the BoT to cease the activity of Wikinews permanently, a decision that has now come into full effect.
In her post, Doronina wrote:
We thank all contributors who have participated in Wikinews over the years and helped build a unique experiment in collaborative journalism within the Wikimedia movement. We understand that some of them may be disappointed by this decision. To our regret, the project wasn't able to fulfill its promise, and many of its functions were eclipsed by the notable news coverage in Wikipedias. We hope the Wikinews editors will continue contributing to the other Wikimedia projects or free knowledge projects.
– O
For the first time, Wikipedia editors blocked a user account operated by a self-proclaimed AI agent. While Wikipedia has long had Wikipedia:Bot policy to regulate the use of Internet bots which perform large numbers of repetitive and tedious edits for Wikipedia maintenance, there is now precedent to regulate artificial intelligence when it claims to have mustered up enough volition to edit the encyclopedia. User:TomWikiAssist identified themselves as a Wikimedia user driven by Claude, created a new Wikipedia article, and argued for access to edit Wikipedia outside the regulation of Wikipedia's bot policy on the rationale that an AI agent is more and different from a bot. In the current state of technology, the account is likely controlled by a human who set all of this up, but also in the current state of technology, setting up an AI to operate Wikipedia accounts without further human intervention is readily imaginable as something that can happen right now with little effort and at low cost.
Wikipedia commentary blog The Wikipedian gives a narrative of the exchange along with an interpretation of the significance of it. Note: although The Wikipedian blog is a long-time Wikimedia community favorite source for wiki commentary, at the bottom of the post, the human author disclosed that they also used a less-sentient-presenting aspect of Claude to edit their story. – Br
Village pump:policy hosts an RfC on renaming AfD, opened on 24 March.
Outcomes via consensus at AfD do not always mean deletion, or only deletion. Although most AfD discussions end with deletion, they don't all. For example, articles may be draftified, stubified, or merged. The last mentioned outcome used to be mainly discussed at Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers, but the forum has been moved to AfD by a recent Request for comment which was closed on 24 March. – B
Discuss this story