The Signpost

File:Official Presidential Portrait of President Donald J. Trump (2025).jpg
Daniel Torok, White House
public domain
0
70
300
In the media

Fake Acting President Trump and a Wikipedia infobox

A fake Wikipedia infobox as published by U.S. President Donald Trump on Truth Social, January 11, 2026.

A true fake

An article in The Independent, a British newspaper, sports the headline "Trump shares fake Wikipedia page calling himself 'Acting President' of Venezuela" (archive). To explain: President Donald Trump, who is, at least, by all accounts President of the United States, posted on his Truth Social media account that he is Acting President of Venezuela. This false announcement is apparently a snub to Delcy Rodriguez, the real fake Acting President of Venezuela.

Rodriguez was the Vice-President of Venezuela under Nicolas Maduro who was removed from office by U.S. troops in a January 3 strike against against Venezuela. Rodriguez was then sworn in as Acting President.

TIME, USA Today, Euronews, the Times of India, Latin Times, China's Global Times and scores of other news outlets covered the story. Almost all noted the similarity of the post to something they've seen on Wikipedia, often calling it "a page". Some viewed the post as "sardonic" or "satire". Some just seemed awe-struck and let their jaws hang.

This is not the first time Trump has caused a brouhaha by posting on Truth Social. In April during the official mourning period for Pope Francis, Trump reposted a picture of himself in papal vestments. In October he posted an AI video of Trump himself dressed as a king, flying a jet fighter and dropping fecal matter on US protestors. – S

"I really don’t like bullies"

Katherine Maher, former CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation and current CEO of NPR, hasn't "brought a tote bag to a knife fight" according to The New York Times. Indeed, the Times calls her "aggressive, refusing to compromise with Congress" while handling multiple crises. She can be "unyielding".

Soon after her 2024 appointment, the right-wing press had called for her ouster after publicizing some of her old tweets. Maher responded that they were her personal tweets from long before she joined NPR and told the Times that "I really don’t like bullies". See prior Signpost coverage

Being CEO of NPR is a difficult job: she is the seventh CEO in the last fifteen years. Furthermore, the last year has been exceptionally difficult with $500 million in funding cut by the federal government, and congressional hearings titled "Anti-American Airwaves: Accountability for the Heads of NPR and PBS." Under Maher NPR even sued the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

She will soon be taking maternity leave. Congratulations, Katherine and keep up the good work. – S

"I have been officially banned by the WMF"

TKTK
When people don't like things, sometimes they write stuff.

D.F. Lovett on his substack Edit History says he has been contacted by Ovsk Mendov who was "officially banned by the WMF". Mendov tells Lovett that he "recently leaked a massive quantity of sensitive information from WMF wikis and [is] about to release it." If true, this could be a really juicy story, but more likely will lead to him releasing hundreds of pages of the most boring stuff you've ever read. Messages from ticked-off blocked sockpuppets are like that. This story does have a couple of interesting sections however: The unlinked letter from the Foundation's Trust and Safety team blocking Mendov does look authentic and could only have been released, according to WMF rules, by the blocked editor. The other interesting section discusses two websites, Wikipediocracy and "Wikipedia Sucks", which are critical of Wikipedia. Lovett suggests that Wikipediocracy has become too tame and has too many members from Arbcom editing the site to really stay a Wikipedia criticism site. But (again according to him), Wikipedia Sucks has kept the faith and is still dishing out the real stuff, not that I recommend it. S

To ERR is human

TKTK
Bronze Soldier of Tallinn (shown in populated area before 2007 relocation to a cemetery), now a symbol of Estonian–Russian Federation tensions, depicted a Red Army soldier liberating Tallinn

Eesti Rahvusringhääling (ERR), Estonia's government supported public broadcasting organization, states that "Estonian volunteers [are] struggling to protect [English] Wikipedia from Russian propaganda". It's a bit more complicated than that, but ERR's source, the newspaper Digigeenius (in Estonian and partially paywalled) wrote three articles on the topic over eight days in some detail.

At first glance, the Estonian position looks weak: The Estonian editors on English Wikipedia have been trying to maintain an earlier status quo that listed the birthplace of Estonians born from 1940-1991 as simply Estonia, but other, presumably Russian, editors were changing this to Estonian SSR, USSR. From 1940-1941 and 1944-1991 births in the area of Estonia were recorded by the government of the Estonian SSR. From 1942-1944 the area was controlled by the Nazi German army. The 1940 Soviet takeover followed quickly after the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact when the Soviets and Nazis secretly divided eastern Europe into Soviet and German spheres of influence. Estonia's argument is that the occupation and annexation of Estonia was illegal and it was never agreed to by the Estonians.

ERR quotes Ronald Liive from Digigeenius who calls the birthplace campaign "mass manipulation on an industrial scale." (Summaries of ERR text added by The Signpost in parentheses)

"A single user has systematically altered nearly 600 profiles of prominent Estonians. From EU High Representative Kaja Kallas and WRC champion Ott Tänak to supermodel Carmen Kass."

"Their birthplaces were forcibly changed to 'Estonian SSR, Soviet Union.' This is not a technical correction; it is a deliberate attempt to erase the legal continuity of the Republic of Estonia. In one instance, this user spent 21 hours and 40 minutes straight redacting Estonian history."

(When Estonian volunteers tried to change the articles, they were banned for "pushing a nationalistic narrative.")

"Meanwhile, articles like Kaja Kallas's have been locked in their distorted pro-Kremlin state, preventing further factual corrections."

(Liive noted similar issues with the Estonian War of Independence, which he said is being "redefined.")

"In several key articles 'defensive campaign' has been replaced with offensive campaign. Estonia's birth is being framed as 'separatism from Russia,' aligning perfectly with modern imperialist rhetoric.

Although Wikipedia favors simple facts over ideological interpretations, considering this, the case for the Estonians now looks much stronger. Several RfCs at the Manual of style on how to record the birthplaces were closed as "no consensus" but several admins interpret that as meaning Estonia SSR should be used. The obvious compromise of listing the birthplaces as "Estonia under Russian occupation" was suggested but ignored by both sides.

One additional oddity: How does one person edit for over 20 hours straight? User:Glebushko0703, who signs his posts on en.Wiki with Gigman, added many Estonian SSR edits and did indeed put in several 20+ hour days making manual edits, on several topics (not all on Estonian biographies) and also just copying and pasting Estonian SSR, USSR into biographies. He is also an editor of the Russian Wikipedia, with 210 edits, where he edits about the days of the calendar year and sites around Moscow. On his en.Wiki user page he accuses Robert Treufeldt, a board member of the Estonian Wikimedia Chapter, of insulting him on Estonian national television. – S

Wikipedia's governance logic examined

TKTK
Are Wikipedia's readers treated like a horse with blinders? A countercurrents contributor thinks so.

"Provisional Bondi Truths: Containment, Power, and the Struggle to Name Palestine on Wikipedia", published at countercurrents.org, looks at a number of issues that came up at the English Wikipedia in 2025. Among several intriguing insights about Wikipedia are these:

"[L]ong-standing governance logic on Wikipedia [is] most visible in Israel/Palestine coverage, where politically charged topics are managed through timing, attribution, and deferral — determining not only what may be stated, but when claims become speakable and whose framing is allowed to appear as neutral knowledge.

and

Official statements are elevated to anchor the framing; structural or contextual analysis is pushed downward; contested interpretations are withheld pending "further verification." The lead language contracts to what carries the least procedural risk, even when that narrowing strips the event of the structural context that gives it meaning.

B

In brief



Do you want to contribute to "In the media" by writing a story or even just an "in brief" item? Edit next week's edition in the Newsroom or leave a tip on the suggestions page.
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
  • For what it's worth, I believe Mr. Mendov is banned from Wikipediocracy for (as I understand it) taking a non-public discussion on WPO and republishing it in a public place on Wikipedia Sucks. I don't have any information about the specifics of the matter, but do want to make clear that his primary home message board is Sucks and not WPO — not that there's anything wrong with that. I do share the general criticism that WPO has lost some essential vinegar of late, but since a few Wikipedians see it as a hate-drenched portal to hell and will always see it that way despite the lack of reality-based evidence, I reckon I'm barking up the wrong tree trying to make that case here. Carrite (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Even I have to admit that WPO has become more tame, and anyone who has been following the forum over the last year knows exacty what changed. WPO becoming a respectable criticism site was not on my bingo card for 2025, but I'm not complaining. - ZLEA TǀC 17:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the "leak": Let me guess, is this the thing with the old dumps? That has been mentioned on the Village Pump at least twice. ~2026-33685-9 (talk) 07:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Because Orange Man dumb, am I right? lol! Marcus Markup (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is Ms Delcy Rodríguez described here as "the real fake Acting President of Venezuela" (boldface added)? Mr Trump seems to be described as the real POTUS. What is fake about Ms Rodríguez? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Probably because the legitimacy of Maduro's election win has been disputed all these while, and this may have been translated down to his government assuming that he picked them for their roles as well? – robertsky (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    • (ec)
    • Delcy Rodriguez was appointed VP by Maduro, who is widely viewed as having stolen his election as president. The illegitimacy of Maduro is one of the reasons given by Trump, for his removal as president. If Maduro is illegit, so is Delcy R. Her brother was also an important part of the Maduro government, probably the 2nd most important part. Being in effect appointed Acting President by her brother, does not make her any more legit. Or maybe you might consider her in effect appointed AP by Trump, who claims that he runs Venezuela and at least has been tolerating her claim to be AP. But there is something even more important. The last Venezuelan presidential election was stolen. The leading candidate Maria Corina Machado was forced out of the election and had to go into hiding. Her "replacement" Edmundo González was widely seen as winning (except that Maduro faked the election count). Maria Machado was awarded this year's Nobel Peace Prize for her work to free Venezuela from the Maduro regime, whch adds up to many people that Machado is the legit President of Venezuela and D.R. is a fake.
Looking at the article Delcy Rodriguez gives some more details:
"On 14 June 2018, President Maduro appointed Rodríguez as the Vice President of Venezuela, succeeding Tareck El Aissami.[58] She also became the head official of the Bolivarian Intelligence Service (SEBIN), Venezuela's intelligence agency, as it is dependent on the office of the vice presidency.[59][60][61] During Rodríguez's time as head of SEBIN, the United Nations found the agency had committed crimes against humanity with the intent of crushing political dissent.[62]"
Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Do you see The Cabal?

Acronyms

This is the first time I have ever put a single word on Wikipedia, so don't troll me if I completely fail at the task. However, I am a writer/editor, and when reading this article, the acronym "WMF" was not defined.

The standard rule of proper writing is that when acronyms first appear, they are to be written out in full, with the acronym in parentheses following. This allows the reader to know that those words will now be used as an acronym throughout the rest of the article. I, personally, have no idea what WMF is, and I know some others don't either. Please define your acronyms. Thanks.

I will not edit the article myself, because that is not my place. I will not touch someone else's work, nor do I wish to submit myself to the edit wars I've heard so much about, and I don't wish to find out the truth of the matter.

Anyway, I hope you make the correction, as far too many articles I see nowadays have forgotten this rule. I also won't respond further. Have a great life everyone, and be kind to one another. NeikloTRRJ (talk) 02:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

















Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-01-15/In_the_media