The Signpost

File:Ziyad Alsufyani (cropped2).jpg
Ziyad al-Sufiani
CC BY-SA 4.0
0
16
300
Special report

Wikipedian and physician Ziyad al-Sufiani reportedly released from Saudi prison

TKTK
Former Arabic Wikipedia administrators Osama Khalid (left) and Ziyad al-Sufiani (right)

On 11 March 2025, British–Saudi-Arabian human rights organisation ALQST stated on X that Saudi medical doctor and Wikipedian Ziyad al-Sufiani (User:Ziad) had been released from al-Ha'ir prison "after over four and a half years of arbitrary imprisonment" for "editing pages like that of Saudi [women human rights defender] Loujain al-Hathloul".

A former editor and administrator of the Arabic Wikipedia, Ziyad was originally arrested back in 2020, together with his fellow doctor and editor Osama Khalid (User:OsamaK), and sentenced to eight years of imprisonment; Osama remains in al-Ha'ir Prison, according to ALQST, as he is currently serving a 32-year prison term, which had in turn been increased from a five-year term in September 2022.

Both were longtime volunteer contributors, having signed up in the late 2000s and since made tens of thousands of edits on a wide range of projects, attending conferences and contributing to projects like the Wiki Project Med Foundation. Both were particularly supportive of online global collaborations, known personally to Wikimedia editors in many countries, visible in their contributions, and notably absent from the communities in which they edited after their arrests.

Khalid and al-Sufiani's imprisonment, on the charge of "swaying public opinion" and "violating public morals", first came to public attention and wider media coverage in January 2023, when the news was broken by the organizations SMEX and DAWN (the latter co-founded by Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi). This revelation came amid a series of group bans of Arabic Wikipedia editors by the Wikimedia Foundation — including a quarter of that project's administrators — citing an investigation which had uncovered a group of users coordinating to push a political agenda who had "close connections with external parties [that were] a source of serious concern for the safety of our users". DAWN said that these banned users had been "recruited to serve as government agents to control information about the country and prosecut[e] those who contributed critical information about political detainees"; the WMF said that the DAWN report contained inaccuracies, and that there had been no evidence to suggest government infiltration. More in-depth analysis, including the Arabic Wikipedia's reaction to the actions, can be found in Signpost coverage of the January 2023 events.

By January 2024, both remained imprisoned, and an open letter signed by nine civil rights organizations demanded their immediate release.

While this is by no means the first time that names have been added to the list of people imprisoned for editing Wikipedia, and will almost certainly not be the last, this release provides a moment of relief for those who have followed the case. Still, incidents like this serve to demonstrate the limits not only of community governance but also of Foundation support and oversight in protecting the safety of editors under authoritarian regimes.

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
  • A good reminder of what freedom really means, and what authoritarians are afraid of. No one should be afraid to edit Wikipedia. I'm glad Ziyad is free. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ganesha811: Well said. Now let's keep praying for Osama, as well. Oltrepier (talk) 20:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • The next step here must be political asylum if possible. No one should be going through this just because they criticize the shitty countries these people live in and the echo chambers they attempt to create. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 23:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      @LunaEclipse: It would certainly be good for Ziyad, but I don't really know which countries would step up to provide this kind of protection at the moment. Also, I don't want to set a dark tone, but -ish can hit the fan everywhere in the world, if people don't fight boldly enough for their rights... Oltrepier (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you, Ziad and OsamaK, for your contributions to Wikipedia and your efforts to give everyone access to reliable information on important topics. — Newslinger talk 17:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delighted to hear Ziyad has been released and I'm hoping Osama will be released soon enough as well. To echo Luna's comment, if seeking asylum is something Ziyad wants to do, I'd certainly hope the WMF would be willing to put some of their resources towards it. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a wikipedian, I am very excited to hear this news. Thanks Allah. Md Mobashir Hossain (talk) 05:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • How did the Saudi government get the names of Osama Khalid and Ziyad al-Sufiani? I notice that their user names are close to their real names. I hope other Saudi editors living in Saudi Arabia are able to edit safely. What does the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) say about their safety? Does the WMF recommend that in-country Saudi editor stop editing? Maybe they should. And then erase all trace of their username on Wikimedia. I can think of many ways that police and security agencies can figure out who an editor is. --Timeshifter (talk) 08:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

















Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-04-09/Special_report