The Signpost

Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Countering Russian aggression with a camera

Base of 9M528 rocket from a multiple rocket launcher
Serhii Petrov in Kharkiv, March 2022
Video of a fire as a consequence of a Russian artillery strike in the neighborhood where Serhii lived before the war. “...There are hits in residential buildings... The whole neighborhood is in smoke,” Serhii says in the background. “It's a genocide against civilian population ...”

On Thursday, February 24th, Serhii Petrov woke up at 5am from the sounds of explosions. His native Kharkiv, the second largest city in Ukraine located 40 kilometres (25 miles) from the Ukrainian-Russian border, was attacked by Russian troops – along with many other regions of Ukraine. Within days, Serhii lost his job and his home. Still, he remains in Kharkiv – which is under Ukrainian control but is heavily shelled by the invading forces – to document the humanitarian consequences of Russian military aggression, including for Wikipedia.

Serhii is a longtime Wikipedia editor, known as User:Kharkivian. He has been an active Wikipedia editor for over a decade now and has created hundreds of articles, including many about his native Kharkiv region. Serhii is also a community leader in his region, having organized multiple training events and Wikipedia campaigns such as the WikiKharkivshchyna contest for libraries and other article & photo contests. Besides, he is a civic activist; Serhii was one of the leaders of the 2013–2014 Euromaidan protests in Kharkiv.

Before the war, Serhii’s day job was working as a content manager at a small company. However, many businesses stopped operating when the full-scale Russian invasion began – and Serhii lost his job. A few days later, he was forced to relocate from his home after his neighborhood came after heavy shelling by Russian troops in early March. His home was a few kilometers from the frontline. There was no heating and no power, and fires started breaking out in his neighborhood. Serhii firmly decided not to evacuate from Kharkiv and remain in the city, but now he has to stay at a colleague’s place in a safer neighborhood.

Now, Serhii’s main work is documenting the impacts of Russian aggression, particularly the war crimes committed by the invaders. As in other parts of Ukraine, Russia bombs civilian areas – Kharkiv authorities say over 1100 buildings were destroyed by Russian shelling, including 1000 residential homes. Serhii takes photos and videos of the destruction’s aftermath so Ukraine can one day hold the aggressors accountable in the international system of justice.

Serhii is doing this work both as a journalist and helping Ukrainian law enforcement agencies. He is also writing daily chronicles of the attack on Kharkiv, which are being translated by volunteers into other languages (see an example in English).

After taking the photos and videos, Serhii uploaded some of them to Wikimedia Commons. He can’t upload some others for safety reasons, but still the evidence of Russian war crimes is plenty. So far, as of March 23rd, Serhii has uploaded around three dozen media files – but many more are to come. Serhii is planning to continue doing this work until the war ends, whenever this day comes. Apart from uploading photos and videos, Serhii is doing technical work on Commons like categorization. He was also a trainer at a recent webinar for volunteers held by Wikimedia Ukraine, and he is working with state agencies to freely license their photos so they can be uploaded to Wikipedia as well.

While documenting the impact of the war, Serhii once came under Russian shelling, but he remained intact and not deterred. Serhii calls this work his way to counter Russian aggression – one person may be most effective when defending the homeland with arms, while another may be most useful with a camera in their hands.

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
Venmo is only available in the US.
Hoping too that he is safe – at least he is still uploading images. Thanks a lot, User:Kharkivian, for your contributions in a very dangerous environment. Albinfo (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never head of Venmo. PayPal is more international; in either case, if some Wikipedians in Ukraine needs support, I hope Signpost will make sure we know the details. I'd be happy to offer some financial assistance (for now I just donate to general refugee supporting NGOs in Poland). Slava Ukrainie! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If The Signpost were to publish a list of Wikimedians in Ukraine that need aid and their preferred payment method, I'd be down! Schierbecker (talk) 23:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Schierbecker: Venmo is indeed not available in Ukraine, but you can support the organization Serhii is part of via PayPal or bank transfer, here's the info (note that it's not a Wikimedian organization). --Aced (talk) 17:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikimedia Ukraine just published a version of this article on their blog [1][2]. Regards, HaeB (talk) 16:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are the buildings in these 3 photos described as "destroyed", instead of "damaged" or "heavily damaged"? IMHO, for a building to be considered destroyed, they would need to be in a far more ruinous condition. However, it may be each of these has suffered serious structural damage which makes repair or rehabilitation impractical -- in which case, that should be explicitly noted. (For example, "damaged building, condemned by local authorities".) -- llywrch (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For simplicity, I guess. Tube·of·Light 03:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We can discuss choice of words, but when the apartment building is so severely damaged that it's impossible to live in (as opposed to light damage like broken windows), it's effectively destroyed as a living space. Aced (talk) 07:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the buildings shown are not destroyed and are habitable. Some of them probably still have habitants who don't have where to go. Destroyed means rubble, no walls or ceilings. Baxbox (talk) 07:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If structural damage renders them unsound, they are effectively destroyed (death traps). Without knowing the actual status (and the odds are the local conditions are preventing a throughout analysis by a building safety inspectors), the difference is not major, particularly as it is likely after the war they'll be torn down anyway. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Destroyed means rubble" - Wiktionary disagrees, offering a different definition: "to damage beyond use or repair." Regards, HaeB (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikitionary is a WIKI. Not a reliable source. Cool guy (talkcontribs) • he/they 15:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • In WWII London the question of whether a damaged house was still liveable was decided by local officials (usually police) in conjunction with builders. I imagine the difference here is the more complete breakdown of local administrative structure, as User:Piotrus suggests. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

















Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-03-27/Eyewitness_Wikimedian,_Kharkiv,_Ukraine