Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes

Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include:

Concise Wikipedia

A concise version of Wikipedia has been proposed, where articles would be up to 500 words in length and contain only the important facts. This was suggested to help the readability of Wikipedia.

Contributions to Edits

A change of wording from "contributions" to "edits" has been suggested, on the basis that this would better reflect what is listed at the Special:Contributions page.

Today's article for improvement to the main page

It has been proposed that a new section be added to the main page to promote editor recruitment.

Fringe theories

The content guideline of fringe theories is under discussion in regards to how broadly or narrowly it should be applied. Fringe theory is described as an idea that is different from the mainstream view.

Adopting the feedback response guideline

A draft guideline for responding to submissions made with the Article Feedback Tool is currently under discussion to be formally adopted.

Section headings for navboxes

The sentence, "Navigation templates located at the bottom of articles may be given a section heading such as "Related information", although the use of such headings has not yet been widely adopted," is under review. Should navboxes in articles have their own section headings?

Actual article count

Concerns regarding the actual article count displayed on the main page were brought up. Should the number include disambiguation pages?

Image policy and guidelines

An update to the image guidelines is under review. The image upload policy and image use guideline would be updated to reflect changes.

Hyphens and en dashes

A discussion has been opened regarding the stoppage of debates regarding en dashes, hyphens, and any other small horizontal lines for one year.

Non-notable album mergings

The policy that "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting" is under review. Redirection is used more often than merging.

In this issue

17 December 2012 (all comments)

News and notes

WikiProject report

Discussion report

Op-ed

Featured content

Technology report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

==Who's in charge here?==

You've missed a deadline. Carrite (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We delayed publication to write up the Arbcom results. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And aren't some of the items repeated from [1]?Jim.henderson (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe J36 repeats prominent discussions that are still ongoing and active. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 01:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• It's em-dashes not en dashes. Mari Adkins 16:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariAdkins (talk • contribs)
  • Actually, "en dashes, hyphens, and any other small horizontal lines" (which includes em dashes) is a direct quote from the proposal. Art LaPella (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]