Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/From the editors Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/Traffic report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/In the media
Over a period of several hours spread across 29 February and 1 March, MediaWiki 1.19 went live to all remaining Wikimedia wikis including the English Wikipedia. Although a number of problems were reported, the deployment as a whole only had to be reverted on the handful of wikis, such as Serbian and Chinese, which rely on the MediaWiki software to provide the same content in two scripts automatically (wikitech-l mailing list). As of time of writing, zhwikis and srwiki are still awaiting the fix that would allow the deployment to proceed.[update 1]
Perhaps more worryingly, the jump in the amount of traffic handled by 1.19 from approximately 10% of total traffic to a figure approaching 100% does appear to have put a significant strain on the Wikimedia servers. Specifically, system administrators have noted a sharp decline (pictured right) in the parser cache hit rate – the percentage of requests for web pages that could be handled without a need for further processing – around the time of the 1.19 deployments. System administrators will be hoping that the effect is only temporary; although its appearance is not yet fully understood, the latest data does indicate that the rate is slowly retreating back to its previous average.
In addition to working on the bug reports that flood in after virtually all large deployments (of which some 23 are currently marked as requiring a fix before 1.19 is released to external sites), developers have also been looking afresh at the issue of changing the default diff colouring (first covered in the Signpost back in December). MediaWiki 1.19 had headlined with accessibility improvements in this area, the benefits of which seemed to have ensured that the change survived a series of long discussions when it was first proposed. On the change's final deployment, however, observers noted that decreases in the contrast ratio offset the improvement for colour-blind users, forcing the change to be reverted (wikitech-l mailing list). A third design is now being trialled; nevertheless, the bold blue-and-yellow-bordered design is almost certain to provoke a fresh round of discussions which it will have to survive if it is to make it onto Wikimedia wikis.
Updates
The Git switchover, which had been been scheduled for March 3, has been postponed until March 21 (wikitech-l mailing list). Announcing the decision on behalf of the Foundation, WMF director of platform engineering Rob Lanphier cited a number of factors, including the unexpected scale of the difficulties resulting from the 1.19 deployment, along with software and hardware issues that would take time to resolve. Perhaps more worryingly, there also seem to be signs that a new code review backlog (the bane of the WMF deployment team's life over the past two years) is starting to build, and that too will need to be resolved before the Git switchover if all the revisions made are to be brought across.
The delay establishes a preliminary schedule for the rest of the month, to include heavy doses of code review, resolution of the hardware and software issues holding back the switchover, a MediaWiki 1.19 release candidate, the full MediaWiki 1.19.0 release, and possibly (if resources permit) a further "mini" deployment to Wikimedia wikis of the sort which will become increasingly common after the Git switchover. Lanphier, however, was clear that the successful Git switchover remained the key objective. "Anything that distracts from that (like, for instance, a [further Wikimedia] deploy) may get postponed while we finish this off once and for all". As of time of writing, Git repositories covering core code and WMF-deployed extensions are currently in a preparatory "read-only" mode, with write-actions for the existing Subversion repository being automatically fed into them (wikitech-l mailing list).
Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/Opinion
On March 1 Béria Lima, moderator of the selection process for the chapters-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, announced the publication of all candidate statements for the two chapter-selected positions that are to be filled this year, with new terms to start July 1. The announcement is indicative of the partly public proceedings of this year's selection process, which has been hailed as a significant improvement in transparency over the last one in 2010. In contrast to the three trustees elected by the editing community, who were last elected in 2011 (Signpost coverage: June 6, June 20), the two chapter seats are filled according to the decision of chapter boards in what has traditionally been a private mailing list and wiki-based process open to neither the community nor the regular chapter members.
Like all Wikimedia Foundation trustees, chapter-selected members are required to oversee foundation affairs, and the board as a governing body exercises authority over the organisation's budget. As such, the board avoids interfering with both the editing processes of the projects and the daily business of foundation staff. Trustees are not direct representatives of those who elect them, but do help to determine the long-term view of the movement as a whole as well as the role of the Wikimedia Foundation within it. The current board structure, established by a reforming resolution passed in 2008, currently consists of four board-appointed "expert" members, three community-elected members, and two chapter-selected members, as well as Jimbo Wales, who occupies the unique position of "founding" member, and is reaffirmed every two years.
This year the community may take part in the open phase of the chapters selection process by submitting questions to the candidates. There are eight candidates in all, including incumbent Phoebe Ayers, who is running for a second term. The other candidates are Alice Wiegand, long-time member of the German chapter board, OTRS administrator, and participant in the movement roles project; Craig Franklin, the Treasurer of Wikimedia Australia and an English Wikipedia ArbCom clerk; Salmaan Haroon, who was extensively involved in the strategy process in 2009–2010; Liam Wyatt, former vice-president of Wikimedia Australia and Wikimedia Foundation cultural partnerships fellow; Raúl Gutiérrez, who provides an outside view backed up by international professional experience; Lodewijk Gelauff, a former steward and board member of Wikimedia Nederland as well as a current member of the Chapters Committee; and Patricio Lorente, the current president of Wikimedia Argentina and a major organizer of Wikimania 2009 in Buenos Aires and Iberocoop, the Regional Cooperation Initiative for Ibero-America of Wikimedia entities.
On March 15 the selection process will advance to the chapters debating the candidates and their responses to questions on the private chapters wiki, at the Wikimedia conference in Berlin end of March, and beyond. If no consensus can be reached before May 5, a vote will be called by the moderators and the trustees to be will be singled out on May 15 by using the single transferable vote method. The process takes place at a delicate time, marked by tensions between the WMF and the chapter community over key issues such as fundraising processing and the nature of relations between Wikimedia entities generally.
Wikipedia:Teahouse is a pilot project exploring innovations in Wikipedia's social dynamics as a means to drive editor retention. Initiated last December, the initiative serves primarily as an incubator for editor development, intended to acclimatise and integrate new contributors to the culture of the editing community. The project is part of Sarah Stierch's gender gap fellowship, and is being managed by foundation community fellows on meta at Research:Teahouse. It aims to offer a "peer support space" to new editors, especially women, in a "many to many" social context. The organisers have envisioned several scenarios in which it could be helpful to new editors.
The image to the right is from the project proposal page on meta, and is meant to evoke the atmosphere that the Teahouse project seeks to create. The "Teahouse" concept was chosen to suggest a comfortable place for "meaningful social interaction", and as a reference to the English Wikipedia essay a nice cup of tea and a sit down, a plea to editors to focus on the good points of others and to interact congenially, especially during conflict. It stresses its social atmosphere by inviting guests to introduce themselves, and features Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions, a help desk of sorts to answer newcomers' questions in "real time".
The Teahouse project was announced at the Village Pump on January 21 and although feedback was requested, little was given. A team of hosts (selected "somewhat on the Online Ambassador process") were recruited to aid the incoming "guests", and the Teahouse was formally launched in late February (see the Teahouse timeline).
According to the proposal, the project is time-limited and will end with a report assessing its success on the basis of specified short-term metrics, to be delivered on May 15. The goals are as follows:
The New Page Triage (NPT) project is a newly announced initiative of the foundation directed at improving quality of new articles, the ease of patrolling them, and the treatment of their creators on Wikipedia, by the introduction of a new software interface. According to Wikipedia:New Page Triage, problems in the way new pages are patrolled, aggravated by problems in the existing setup at Special:NewPages, created frustration in the Wikipedia community that led to their endorsement of the autoconfirmed article creation proposal that would have put tighter controls on who could create new articles. Although the foundation declined to implement that proposal on the grounds that it was exclusionary and insufficiently respectful of the editor retention priority (Signpost coverage), staffers have striven to make clear that they appreciate community concerns with the quality of the new page patrollers' experience and the other goals.
The engagement component of the Triage initiative proposes that, contrary to precedent, discussion of these improvements will take place on the English Wikipedia, and working prototypes will be provided so that editors can experience the new software and provide feedback. There will be "regular and nuanced discussion between the Foundation and the community throughout the design process" via the community liaison for product development (currently Oliver Keyes), who is a dedicated Foundation contractor. Feedback on the draft proposal is also encouraged directly on the discussion page, while those interested in following the development may sign up for a newsletter at Wikipedia:New Page Triage.
Old Man Murray was a US computer gaming review website begun in the late 1990s by Chet Faliszek and Erik Wolpaw. Harsh, irreverent, and satirical, many in the gaming industry look back on the website as an inspirational classic. Faliszek and Wolpaw went on to work in the industry for Valve Software and were central figures in the creation of Portal, one of the most popular and critically-acclaimed games of the last few years. So, naturally, people in the industry and gaming fans were surprised when the Wikipedia article on Old Man Murray was deleted on March 2. The deletion was overturned the next day at Deletion Review.
Deletion discussions can be one of the most contentious interactions Wikipedians have with those outside Wikipedia, especially when it involves a subculture or fandom with vocal adherents. Perhaps the most notorious of these incidents was the long running conflict regarding the deletion of articles on webcomics, as discussed in this 2007 Wikinews article. Non-Wikipedians often interpret a deletion discussion as an assault on their field of interest and are offended at Wikipedians who are ignorant of it making decisions about it, and some of them respond with uncivil comments or personal attacks. Wikipedians are dismayed when they are the subject of personal attacks during what should be a sober policy discussion, and see the vocal fans who are denouncing them as little better than those who vandalize articles. Needless to say, this isn't a fertile ground for productive discussion between the two groups.
This time was no exception. Gaming blogs and message boards filled with angry messages (a Slashdot article received over 400 comments) and many fans shared their ire by posting to the Wikipedia deletion discussion. Rob Beschizza, Managing Editor of the popular website Boing Boing, wrote about the deletion. About two dozen prominent figures in the gaming industry responded to a call by John Walker from the gaming blog Rock, Paper, Shotgun to testify to the importance of Old Man Murray. Valve co-founder Gabe Newell wrote that "Old Man Murray were the Velvet Underground of post-print journalism" and Bryan Lee O'Malley, creator of the Scott Pilgrim graphic novels which are steeped in gaming culture, wrote "As far as I'm concerned, Old Man Murray invented the internet, and also invented making jokes about video games, two things which are maybe the foundation of everything I hold dear." Walker told the Signpost that he was not surprised by this response. "OMM is something spoken about by people in our industry with hushed tones of reverence. I'd be fairly disappointed to learn a developer was not a fan of their writing."— 7 March 2011 edition: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/In focus
The Arbitration Committee neither opened nor closed any cases this week, leaving one open.
On March 1, the Arbitration Committee announced the appointment of three new community members of the Audit Subcommittee (AUSC). Avraham (talk · contribs), Ponyo (talk · contribs), and Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs) will serve one-year terms on the subcommittee, while MBisanz (talk · contribs) has been designated an alternate should a subcommittee member resign.
AUSC was established by the committee to investigate complaints concerning the use of CheckUser and Oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia, and to provide better monitoring and supervision of the CheckUser and Oversight positions along with the use of the applicable tools. There were three vacancies in non-arbitrator positions on the subcommittee, due to the election of past community members AGK and Courcelles to the committee itself, and the expiration of community member Keegan's term at the end of March.
This case was opened to review alleged disruptive editing on the Manual of Style and other pages pertaining to article naming. The workshop phase had been extended by arbitrator AGK last week. Drafter David Fuchs stated on 4 March that he would post "part or all of the [proposed decision]" later this week.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-03-05/Humour