Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/From the editors Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/Traffic report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/In the media
As noted in last week's "Technology Report", Wikimedia wikis underwent a scheduled downtime of one hour on Tuesday 24 May at around 13:00–14:00 UTC. The downtime meant that the Foundation has already missed previous aired targets of limiting downtime to just 5.256 minutes per annum (equivalent to 99.999% uptime) and 52.6 minutes (99.99% uptime) for this calendar year. However, the work does appear to have been successful at reducing the quantity of out-of-date pages served to readers and other similar problems.
During the downtime, designed to allow the operations team sufficient time to "update the router software and tune the configuration", access to Wikimedia sites was intermittent. The episode and associated issues was alluded to by cartoonist Randall Monroe on his comic strip xkcd (see also this week's "In the news" for more details). Wikimedia developers enjoyed dissecting the technical aspects of the cartoon on the wikitech-l mailing list.
Many Wikipedia editors can now access the Internet from multiple locations: at home, at work, even on-the-go with smartphones. In 2010, however, only 30% of the world had any access at all to the so-called "World Wide Web", even when the high rates of availability found in the developed world are allowed to skew the data (source: CIA World Factbook). Since the Wikimedia Foundation's aim is to "encourage the growth, development and distribution of free, multilingual content", it is clear that either the remaining 70% will have to be supplied with the Internet so they can access the online versions of Wikimedia wikis, or the Wikimedia wikis will have to be provided in an offline-friendly format (in contrast, 50% of the world has used a computer, according to Pew Research). The "Wikipedia Offline" project, then, is a WMF initiative aimed at spreading its flagship product freely to the two billion people who use a computer but cannot access the Internet.
There are two parts to the challenge: firstly, in ensuring that there are Wikipedias in as many languages as possible. The number of users for whom a Wikipedia exists in a language they speak was recently estimated as above 98% (foundation-l mailing list); about 82% have a Wikipedia in their native tongue (also foundation-l). The second challenge is the technical one of supplying the information. A current strategy of the Foundation is to continue to make the raw data of Wikipedias available via so-called "dumps", while simultaneously supporting open-source programs that can process these files. In combination, this will allow whole Wikipedias to be either downloaded when an Internet connection is available, or to be shipped on DVDs or other portable media. This runs alongside the Foundation's existing project to select the most useful articles from a given Wikipedia, hence condensing an encyclopedia onto a single CD.
While "dumps" are largely tried and tested (though recent work has focussed on improving their regularity and reliability), there have also been efforts to enable the export of smaller "collections" of articles, for example those relating to major health issues faced by developing countries. This was in part provided by a new export format (ZIM, developed by the openZim project) that can be read by some offline readers. However, ongoing efforts focus mainly on the second half of the strategy: the provision of a good-quality reader capable of displaying off-line versions of wikis. A number of possible readers were tested. The "Kiwix" reader was selected in late 2010, and the Foundation has since devoted time to improving its user interface, including via the translation of its interface. There is also competition from other readers, including "Okawix", the product of the French company Linterweb. User:Ziko blogged last week about the differences he found between the two. Which, if either, will become the standard is unclear, because it is such a fast-moving area.
See also: Wikimedia strategy document, update on Wikimedia's progress (as of March 2011).
Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/Opinion
Discussion and feedback on the update has involved extensive community input: more than 35,000 words over the past year, and almost 55,000 words in the year before that. There have been five revisions at roughly six-monthly intervals, the first in April 2009. Arbitrator Roger Davies told The Signpost that the way the Committee works in practice has evolved significantly since the first policy was ratified in 2005, yet the text has remained static; the proposed update to the policy reflects how things now work in practice, and is structured in a way that is much clearer and more accessible to editors.
All Wikipedians are encouraged to vote in the referendum.
User:Dominic (Dominic McDevitt-Parks) recently began his stay as Wikipedian in Residence at the US National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) (cf. Signpost coverage of the announcement). Similar to previous projects at other GLAM institutions (galleries, libraries, archives, and museums), the job description lists the following broad goals for the residency (a paid student internship lasting until late August):
“ |
|
” |
As described by Sj on the "Wikilove.in" blog, Dominic has already secured an image donation of 220 high-resolution reproductions of public domain images, responding to an earlier uploading request on Commons for the already available low-resolution versions. It concerns a series of black-and-white photographs dating mostly from 1941–42, commissioned from photographer Ansel Adams – mostly landscape photographs of US National Parks and portraits of native Americans. Sarah Stierch (fellow Wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian's Archives of American Art, cf. Signpost coverage) pointed out that while Adams' photos are in the public domain, NARA's release of the high-resolution reproduction was nevertheless significant: Adams' work, she said, "is known for being one of the most accessible to the public eye – pleasant and monumental images of the parks of the West, often making their ways into calendars and posters in gift shops ... This accessibility and availability allows for cultural organizations to milk what they can out of licensing; fearing to release their images into the public domain due, claiming they'll lose major income. Many of us within the [GLAM] world know that this is rarely a truth".
The first editing challenge is currently in preparation, and will involve the "Today's Document" section on the NARA website. Dominic told The Signpost that it "will hopefully stimulate article content on Wikipedia to be used or referenced on the National Archives website, as well as bring in high-resolution documents from the National Archives."
Last week, NARA saw an hour-long presentation by Liam Wyatt (User:Witty lama, who has just left the Wikimedia Foundation's office, where he had spent part of his year-long WMF "GLAM fellowship" about cultural collaborations). In his introduction (as well as in a blog post), David Ferriero, the Archivist of the United States, said he had "long been a fan of Wikipedia", emphasized the importance of GLAM-WIKI collaborations, and called Liam Wyatt (whom he credited with introducing NARA to local Wikimedians) "one of the [Wikimedia] movement's greatest champions". In January, NARA had already hosted 90 Wikimedians for a one-day "WikiXDC" event celebrating Wikipedia's 10th anniversary (Signpost coverage).
As reported in the May "This month in GLAM" newsletter, DC Wikimedians were exploring possible collaborations with the Center for History and New Media last week, founded by the late Roy Rosenzweig – known to many Wikipedians for his 2006 essay about Wikipedia, titled "Can History be Open Source?".
The log of last week's office hour with WMF Executive Director Sue Gardner has been posted. Topics included work on the 2011–12 annual plan. Gardner explained that "one of the issues the board grapples with ... is how much emphasis the Wikimedia Foundation should put on growing its operational reserve fund ... balancing the importance of programmatic activities (e.g., Visual Editor) against the importance of yes, having rainy day funding." Another part of the tech budget will go into the "Wikimeda Labs" projects. Brion Vibber said "it's still all a little vague at this point", but that it would include "adapting toolserver-like infrastructure and making it even easier for researchers and experimenters (should be very awesome). [It] will be more flexible than toolserver and we'll be able to let folks run more server-ish tools".
Trustee Kat Walsh talked about several aspects of the Board's work. Gardner also looked ahead to the wrap-up of the Public Policy Initiative, scheduled for September. The WMF intends to make permanent "the most successful elements of that program, and internationalise its work. .... We're also going to fund more 'editor recruitment' in India, and begin some similar work in Brazil. [We hope] to fund a couple of community convenings (gatherings of community members to tackle hard challenges like editor retention)... we're wanting to finally start the [online] shop, so people have easy access to Wikimedia merchandise ... and we'll be spending a little more money on legal work." Regarding financial sources, she remarked "that we (WMF) don't have a 'bad boy' donor policy. Some non-profits explicitly have people they won't take money from: we don't [have such a list]."
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/In focus
The Arbitration Committee opened no new cases. Two cases are currently open.
During the week, further proposals were submitted in the proposed decision for arbitrators to vote on.
During the week, drafter Elen of the Roads submitted additional proposals in the workshop which received comments from arbitrators and parties to the case.
The Committee has clarified that the injunction included in last week's Signpost coverage may now be regarded as expired. This is because an arbitration case will not be opened, and pending changes are not enabled on any main namespace pages [1]. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30/Humour