Anniversary coverage continues; Thai government translates Wikipedia; brief news

The tenth anniversary of Wikipedia on January 15 brought unprecedented amounts of media coverage (some of which had already begun earlier, see last week's "in the news"). Many reports recounted the history of Wikipedia, numerous notable pundits gave their interpretation of the project's significance, and prominent Wikimedians such as Jimmy Wales were much in demand for interviews and quotes.

British historian and author Timothy Garton Ash told readers of The Guardian that "We've seen America's vitriol. Now let's salute Wikipedia, a US pioneer of global civility", which he described as "an American invention which, for all its faults, tries to spread around the world a combination of unpaid idealism, knowledge and stubborn civility", contrasting it with "the vitriolic incivility of American political discourse, as heard on talk radio and cable channels such as Fox News". (A version of the same op-ed that appeared two days later in the LA Times omitted mention of Fox News and carried the less evocative title "Look it up: Wikipedia is turning 10".) The well-known motto "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet ..." was described by Ash as "almost Lennonist".

The Atlantic collected opinions from "All-Star Thinkers on Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary", including Bruce Sterling ("I worry about their frailty. ... Warm, kindly, humane Wikipedia didn't grow up in today's Internet. Now it's like a hothouse orchid the size of a barn."[3]), Scientific American editor-in-chief Mariette DiChristina ("Wikipedia underscores an evolutionary lesson: we've always gotten farther as a species collaborating than going it alone" [4]), Ethan Zuckerman ("Wikipedia's victory was getting the rules – and importantly, the rules for making rules – right, and trusting that the process would lead to substance" [5]) and Clay Shirky ("[Wikipedia] took one of the best ideas of the last 500 years – peer review – and expanded its field of operation so dramatically that it changed the way authority is configured" [6]). Jonathan Lethem's highly critical piece ("the generation of an infinite number of bogusly 'objective' sentences in an English of agonizing patchwork mediocrity is no cause for celebration") met with rebuttals by Wikimedians Andrea James on Boing Boing and David Shankbone on his personal blog.

In a different article ("Wikipedia – an unplanned miracle", The Guardian), Shirky focused further on Wales' and Sanger's "radical" idea of "putting the people who care in charge, rather than anointing experts or authorities". Shirky said that a wiki "has at its core only one social operation: I care." He explained that "what looks like a stable thing is in fact a result of ceaseless attempts to preserve what is good, and to improve what isn't. Wikipedia is best understood not as a product with an organisation behind it, but as an activity that happens to leave an encyclopedia in its wake".

Wired UK published a series of articles in the form of a "Wikipedia Week", one of them ("Viewpoints: what the world thinks of Wikipedia") featuring opinions by Larry Sanger, Wikipedia researcher Joseph Reagle, Robert McHenry (former editor-in-chief of Britannica), Wikipedians Siska (from Indonesia, cf. Signpost coverage) and User:WereSpielChequers, and others.

As an example for "how disruptive to our understanding of the world can Wikipedia be", an anniversary article on ReadWriteWeb compared the Wikipedia article Battle of Horseshoe Bend (1814) to the entry on the same topic in the 1970 edition of the American Peoples Encyclopedia, noting that the paper encyclopedia left out vital information about the battle ("a story of deeply racist betrayal"). "It's like Wikipedia is to the encyclopedia what Wikileaks is to a White House press conference."

Indian news outlet NDTV explained "How Wikipedia wooed and won the world", using a short summary of its early history and quotes from German sociologist Christian Stegbauer.

Die Zeit, the largest German weekly newspaper, featured Wikipedia on its title page with the headline "Das größte Werk der Menschen" ("the greatest work of human beings"); its coverage included an article by German Wikipedian Logograph about the daily work of an administrator. Die Zeit also programmed a web widget showing animated recent article edits from the German Wikipedia that can be used on any website.

Al Jazeera quoted a wide range of commenters, from Wikimedia's own Sue Gardner to critic Andrew Keen (noting that the article about him was in a vandalized state at the time of the interview).

In China, the Communist Party's newspaper People's Daily published an overall positive article (in Chinese - Google translation) about Wikipedia as a "knowledge revolution", comparing collaboration on Wikipedia to "children's collective participation in the 'clay sculpturing' game, full of creative, playful pleasure".

Mashable worried "Wikipedia celebrates 10 years, but will it survive another decade?", and defended Wikipedia against its "reputation for loopy reportage", pointing out that "Wikipedia is, in the best-case scenario, an antidote for the echo chamber of the web." One of the statements in the article, that "two Ayn Rand devotees, Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, created Wikipedia" drew a rebuttal by Sanger: "I am not, and was not, an 'Ayn Rand devotee.'"

On Inside Higher Ed, a librarian described how she had "come to appreciate the way that Wikipedia in so many ways helps students understand fundamental features of how information works", familiarizing them with the concept of references and demonstrating "that knowledge itself is a community project" and not "just for school."

US website Politico observed that "Wikipedia has become a go-to reference guide for political insiders and mainstream Americans alike", quoting several experts, one of them describing Wikipedia as "the 800-pound gorilla that flies" and "itself a political achievement".

PCMag.com's editor-in-chief Lance Ulanoff warned "Wikipedia: You Still Can't Trust It", pointing to the history of the article about himself, and alleging bias in the article about Microsoft. NetworkWorld listed "The 10 biggest hoaxes in Wikipedia's first 10 years" and the Huffington Post compiled a slideshow of "the funniest vandalized entries".

Canada's National Post seemed to remain on the fence about Wikipedia ("10 years on, Wikipedia’s potential still unknown"). Alluding to Larry Sanger's announcement of Wikipedia on January 17, 2001 ("Humor me. Go there and add a little article. It will take all of five or ten minutes"), the newspaper said: "When Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger started out, all they were asking for was five or 10 minutes of your time. Instead, we’ve given them a decade."

Slate.com used the Wikipedia article on Jesus "as a guide to the online encyclopedia's 10-year history", surveying its version history since the page was started on March 3, 2001 by Jimmy Wales (sample: "On Jan. 19, 2005, Wikipedia Jesus got a security detail; unregistered users were now forbidden to edit the page").

On his "The Wikipedian" blog, William Beutler (User:WWB) described how he was interviewed by Ukrainian TV station INTER.TV about Wikipedia on the occasion of the anniversary.

Notably absent from the anniversary coverage was UK website The Register, whose harshly critical (and at times highly inaccurate) reporting has accompanied Wikipedia during most of the last ten years.

On January 13, Jimmy Wales was in Bristol, UK, to celebrate the anniversary (coinciding with the city's "Festival of Ideas"). He presented at the Bristol Cathedral and Bristol University's Victoria Rooms (video recordings) and received considerable media attention (example: "Jimmy Wales outlines Wikipedia future for Bristol"). MacWorld [7] and technology news website Tech.blorge ("Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales: App stores a clear and present danger]") highlighted his personal remarks that the app store model introduced by Apple was "a threat to a diverse and open [IT] ecosystem", arguing that "we own [a] device, and we should control it." On this issue of net neutrality, however, Wales "argued that many of the concerns ... were hypothetical and didn’t pose an immediate danger. While he noted the entire issue was complicated ... he said elements of the campaign for net neutrality were 'highly overblown'."

In contrast, the Wikimedia Foundation's Executive Director Sue Gardner said in an op-ed for The Guardian that "the fate of network neutrality (the concept that aims to keep the internet open and free) is under attack everywhere, particularly in the mobile space, and I'm continually surprised by how few Americans seem to understand the issue and why it matters", wondering if "the power of Wikipedia to join people together in a vast social enterprise was just an aberration. I fear that the conditions that gave rise to it may be disappearing". (See also earlier Signpost coverage: "Wikipedia as a poster child for net neutrality")

In a video interview, The Daily Telegraph asked Jimmy Wales about differences between the various language versions of Wikipedia. He said that there were "kind of the same", fueled by "a certain geek culture which transcends national culture", and that the Wikipedia communities he had seen around the world consisted mostly of "the same kind of people" – "super geeky and really smart", although for example meetups in India were still even more male-dominated than those in the US or UK. Regarding the controversial fundraising banners featuring his personal appeal, Wales was quoted as saying "there were 9 million people asking me to stop staring at them". But according to a portrait in The Globe and Mail ("Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales: The man with all the answers"), Wales still doesn't frequently get recognized in public "except at Apple stores and in Germany, where Wikipedia apparently has become a minor national obsession." The article also quoted Mitch Kapor, who "has known Mr. Wales since 2003 and acted as an informal mentor", and credits him with leadership skills that avoid exercising direct authority – "a less farsighted person would be tempted to retreat from volunteer control, decentralized [power], and anonymity".

A BBC radio feature recounted the beginnings of Wikipedia, based on an interview with Jimmy Wales, who named inherently funny word as one of his favorite articles on Wikipedia.

An article on The New York Times "Bits" blog titled "Wikipedia Marks 10 Years of Edit-It-Yourself", illustrated with a photo of Jimmy Wales demonstrating Wikipedia in 2001, said that according to Wales, despite efforts to make the uploading of media easier, "the site would never become flashy", quoting him as saying "we are not going to become Facebook, we are not going to become MySpace or YouTube". Sue Gardner stated that "Wikipedia is modest. It isn’t a beautiful site. It looks a little awkward — sometimes the writing is a little bit awkward," but that people still have "a deep and abiding affection for it." In addition to Brazil, she named Egypt as a possible location for a new office of the Wikimedia Foundation (after the one which is going to open in India in the next months). In a Reuters interview [8], Gardner emphasized that the Foundation would remain a non-profit: "We don't move in the world of IPOs and valuation and investment. We never talk about it, we never think about it."

Other lists of media coverage:

• On the Foundations's anniversary wiki, a list of international media coverage has been compiled.
• On January 13, the Foundation's Head of Communications Jay Walsh summarized some highlights that had appeared until then ("Wikipedia 10 hits the headlines")
• On her personal blog, Sue Gardner listed "some of my favourite coverage of Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary".
• The Huffington Post collected some answers to the question "What Has The Site Taught Us?" from the anniversary media coverage.
• As always, Wikipedia:Press coverage 2011 collects Wikipedia-related news coverage.
• This week's "News and notes" mentions some further news coverage of the celebrations themselves.

In her anniversary message on the Foundation's official blog, Sue Gardner observed:

On Wikipedia Review, a web forum devoted to criticism of Wikipedia, regular participants seemed to agree with Gardner's observations, lamenting the positive media coverage of the anniversary as "just another measure of how badly The Wikipedia Review is falling down on the job of educating the public about the real nature of Wikipedia, Wikia, and the Wikimedia Foundation", and observing that "the 'comments campaign' clearly hasn't worked – not enough people read these [a reference to the frequent posting of negative comments by Wikipedia Review members in the comments sections of online news articles]. What is needed is PR for the other 'Wikipedia Story' on US or British or other national media."

"Global Watchtower" (a blog of a Massachusetts-based market research company about "Globalization in Practice") reports that on January 7, "in the run-up to Children’s Day, Thailand’s Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva announced the launch of the complete English-language Wikipedia in Thai. This was presented as a gift of knowledge to the children of Thailand from the government and local business partners". The 3.5 million articles were machine-translated by translation company Asia Online and are already online (example – translation of scrimshaw, the provenance and license of the text appear to be stated correctly). Proofreading is to be done by ten employees of the company who will concentrate on the most popular articles, as well as by "crowdsourced" volunteers who will also be able to add content – the company's vice president explained that "we will add social networking components over time to enable discussions of the content and nurture the creation of more Thai-focused content." Global Watchtower called it "quite possibly the single largest translation project currently underway." It appears to have been already discussed by the Thai Wikipedia community.

• Wikipedia used by more than half of adult American Internet users: A new report about the usage of Wikipedia in the US by the Pew Research Center states that "the percentage of all American adults who use Wikipedia to look for information has increased from 25% in February 2007 to 42% in May 2010", corresponding to 53% of adult Internet users.
• Becoming more tolerant by Wikipedia: Lifehacker explained How Wikipedia can make you a more tolerant person, recalling the writer's conflict with a fan of pop group The Nolans.
• GLAM-Wiki "most important trend" of 2010: Asked by Swedish organization ideK to comment on "Trends of 2010 and 2011" in the GLAM sector (galleries, libraries, archives and museums), blogger "Kadmeian Letters" (David Haskiya – product developer at Europeana) stated: "In my opinion the most important trend in 2010 is that GLAM-Wiki collaboration is on the cusp of becoming mainstream. This will have an effect on how Wikipedia volunteers and Wikimedia Foundation work with GLAMs – from the challenge of scarcity to the challenge of abundance."
• Wikipedia "stiff and middle-aged"?: An article in The Economist entitled "In praise of Wikipedia: Wiki birthday to you" commended Wikipedia's success as a crowdsourcing resource, but also warned of Wikipedia's accuracy problems, its precarious sustainability, and its openness to new contributors. "Wikipedia is already starting to look rather stiff and middle-aged," warned the article. "It needs to rediscover the flexibility of its early years." While the author noted the desire of Wikipedians to keep Wikipedia welcoming for new users, the author lists Wikipedia's "ossified and bureaucratic" appearance, with its own "curious jargon", as the top concern. "In recent years its most active contributors have become obsessed with obscure questions of doctrine," the article says. "The number of regular contributors to Wikipedia’s English edition peaked in March 2007 and has since declined by a third."
• Wikipedia too complicated for many: A BBC News website article entitled "Jimmy Wales says Wikipedia too complicated for many" featured an interview with Jimmy Wales, highlighting his intent to introduce Wikipedia to a "new generation of contributors, including more women". Wales also commented about the use of his image in the fundraising banner, saying "that he had tried to resist using his picture, but user testing had shown the organisation received more money by using his face" and gave an update about the WikiLeaks-related domains that were still being owned by Wikia (cf. WP:WIKILEAKS and earlier Signpost coverage listed there). The BBC reported that Wales "regularly tries to prompt Wikileaks' founder Julian Assange to complete the transaction [transfering ownership of the domains to WikiLeaks], to no avail", quoting Wales as saying "I saw someone else say that he's prone to saying 'I'm busy fighting superpowers' and that's exactly what he said to me." Wales said the domains were to expire last week and that he was not renewing them.
• Lost in WikiLand: In a BBC News Magazine article entitled "Lost in Wikipedia", British contributor and administrator Richard Symonds (Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry) explains why he enjoys updating Wikipedia so much: "It's easy to get lost while wandering through Wikipedia."
• Wikipedia at 10: The BBC World Service ran a 30 minute radio documentary (streaming audio available here) narrated by its Science in Action presenter Jon Stewart on the history of the project. It raised questions on the use of consultants who are paid to edit Wikipedia articles by public relations companies.
• Computer game debate revisited: As part of its "Wikipedia Week", Wired UK asked "Should Wikipedia be responsible for gaming’s history?", recalling past debates about notability of MUD games, explaining that they had been caused by a lack of reliable sources in that topic area.
• Using Wikipedia to advertise small businesses: The "Small Business Blog" of US software company Intuit asked "How Can a Small Business Get on Wikipedia?", noting that "many small businesses are eager to see themselves on Wikipedia. But getting your company on the site can be difficult and stressful." It quoted the president of a SEO marketing company who "many years ago [..] had tremendous success advising clients on Wikipedia listings that drove highly targeted traffic" until Wikipedia editors were alerted and deleted the client's page and related pages. Gregory Kohs (User:Thekohser, founder of MyWikiBiz, who was banned from Wikipedia for similar activities years ago), gave some advice on how to hide such a conflict of interest from Wikipedians.
• Wikipedia geography research: For an ongoing research project at Oxford University ("Wikipedia's Networks and Geographies: Representation and Power in Peer-Produced Content"), geographer Mark Graham is hiring a part-time Research Assistant (deadline: 27 January). See also earlier Signpost coverage of Graham's work: "Geographical distribution of articles by language", "Northern Ireland less well represented on Wikipedia"
  
  Reader comments
  

2011-01-17

Upcoming steward elections, and a retrospective on stewards' work in 2010

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By DerHexer

DerHexer became a Wikipedian in 2005 when he started editing in the German Wikipedia. Two years later, he was elected as an admin on the English Wikipedia and as a steward of the Wikimedia Foundation. He is now mainly involved in oversight-related tasks.

Next month, the eighth steward elections and confirmations will take place on meta-wiki. This is a good time to explain what stewards do and how the arrangements for stewards have changed over the past few years, so that participants in the election and confirmation process know the context, and new candidates know what to expect.

What stewards are

The Stewards' policy says that stewards have complete access to the wiki interface on all Wikimedia wikis, including the ability to change user and group rights. They are tasked with the technical implementation of community consensus, and with dealing with emergencies (for example, cross-wiki vandalism, and checkuser and oversight requests). Stewards aim to make no decisions as stewards, but are empowered to act as a member of any permissions group on any project with no active member of that permissions group. For example, wikis without administrators may call on stewards to fulfill that role; stewards will act as a bureaucrat as needed on wikis without bureaucrats. The position of steward was originally created to dissociate rights management from software development and systems administration. Stewards can also be involved in testing user rights and new software functions.

New election process

In 2010, eight new stewards were elected by the Wikimedia community, while 26 out of the 31 then-stewards were confirmed. Although a committee decided in all conscience about the confirmation process last year, there had been issues about some of their decisions, so the process will be changed for 2011. Because of the departure of Cary Bass as Volunteer Coordinator, stewards now have to organize the whole election themselves, with input from the Foundation's Head of Reader Relations, Philippe. The Board of Trustees decided that this time they will abstain from confirming the result of the new elections. As a result, stewards attending Wikimania 2010 at Gdańsk – about a third of all stewards – discussed how to change the election/confirmation process to encourage more volunteers to become stewards. Since these discussions didn't reach consensus, the 2011 elections will be held under the same arrangements as for previous years: to become a steward, a candidate will need to obtain at least 30 votes in favor with an 80% support ratio to become a steward. But since the guidelines for eligibility in this election have changed, only users who have been admins for at least three months in one Wikimedia project will be allowed to nominate themselves for stewardship; we hope this might discourage frivolous candidatures!

Division of work

Last year, four stewards resigned (Oscar, Effeietsanders, Mike.lifeguard, and Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt), leaving only 30 stewards. As usual, only a few stewards are carrying out the bulk of the workload, a situation that unfortunately didn't improve after the 2010 election (see the stats). Some of these users who were highly active with crosswiki work before their election were unable to maintain their level of activity in their last term. Only two of the "new" stewards, dferg and Jyothis, were in a position to provide regular assistance with stewards' main tasks: looking out for new abusive usernames in the IRC channel #cvn-unifications, and incorrect edits in smaller projects via #cvn-sw, both as members of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team. Most other stewards helped out more whenever they were needed in #wikimedia-stewards, or with assigning bot and user rights. Almost every steward was quite active within the last year (details), and only one, the Foundation Board member Sj, may lose his rights because of inactivity. For the rest, any positive or negative feedback can be mentioned in February's confirmations, to be held simultaneously with the elections of new stewards.

Candidates

While global sysops gave considerable help to smaller wikis in fighting vandalism, there has been no decrease in the amount of work that must be handled exclusively by stewards. Given the reduction in stewards' numbers, new candidates will be welcome, even if they haven't yet gained much interwiki experience. Only a few users who could be helpful as stewards are currently interested in doing crosswiki work, so other volunteers are also asked to take part in this election. If their communities trust and support them, they may be successful in convincing those users who are more active in steward-related work as well. Some users who have been elected this way have become skilled in their role! So, don't hesitate to nominate yourself as a steward if you've been an admin on any Wikimedia wiki for at least three months. You'll have time to do that until February 6 (see above for prerequisites).

Software testers

Stewards should not expect accolades; instead, like a lot of roles on Wikimedia sites, it's hard work if you play for keeps. Stewards are often the first ones who have to deal with new software functions, and have to test them to protect sometimes thousands of users from difficulties. The bugs they identify are then reported to Bugzilla. Unfortunately, not all major bugs have been fixed (see out-dated list). It's no big issue for bugs like bug 20267, which are only transparency issues and can be avoided by people's good faith; but stewards also report security-, data-protection-, or privacy-related bugs such as bugs 19725, 21279, 23126 (!) and 23310, which are not yet fixed. They appeared when the CentralAuth interface was changed in 2009 because of bug 18183 and others. For example, some stewards still use an alternative function in CentralAuth to hide oversightable usernames, so m:Special:Log/globalauth has to be cleaned up from time to time by local oversights.

International problems

The function of bug 20954 forces stewards to switch on global oversight rights, just to be able to review potentially oversightable edits by users whose username stewards have quickly had to hide from logs and article histories. Following a software change, SUL accounts that are locked and hidden are no longer prevented from logging in, but only from editing wikis. This means that if they visit a new project, another account will be attached to their global one (see bug 23126), and their abusive username will be added to another local log. So the most work stewards have to deal with is caused by registrations of abusive user names (mostly on smaller projects from which they proceed to bigger projects). Such behavior first evokes global (b)locks or global hideuser actions, followed by checkusering of their accounts, sock puppets and IPs, so that also the latter can be globally blocked. This work is critical for the well-being of the whole Wikimedia project.

Another example concerns a problem on the Portuguese Wikipedia which has been keeping stewards busy. In November 2010, all terms of their active bureaucrats and checkusers ended so that stewards now have to do all their work (for example at m:Steward requests/Checkuser). New elections seemed to have failed because of the community's deep inner conflicts. So, there is currently an arbcom case dealing with a possible abuse of a former checkuser, which also involved global sysops and oversight requests.

If you think that you're willing and able to help out with any of these cases (and possible new ones), please do not hesitate to do so and join the steward elections!

Reader comments

2011-01-17

Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By SMasters

WikiProject news

News in brief

• The United States Collaboration of the Month has been restarted and is open to new contributors. All US-related WikiProjects are encouraged to participate and recommend their own articles as well.
• Earn Wikifavors, barnstars, real-world goodies, and even money by completing requests posted at the Reward Board.
• The January 2011 Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive has knocked out two months from the backlog. Join today and earn barnstars along the way.

Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the Signpost's WikiProject Desk.

This week, we turn our attention to WikiProject Cricket. Started by Jguk 2 in December 2004, it is one of the most active projects around, with 194 members. An enduring WikiProject with six years under its belt, it boasts 59 Featured articles, 48 Featured lists, 76 Good articles, a Featured portal and a Featured topic – with a total of 21,039 assessed articles. It might come as a surprise to some that cricket is the world's second most popular sport, after association football. First documented as being played in southern England in the 16th century, it had become the national sport of England by the end of the 18th century. The sport's growth is tied to the expansion of the British Empire, and by the mid-19th century, the first international matches were being held. Today, the game's governing body, the International Cricket Council (ICC), has 105 member countries. With a history spanning over 400 years, there is a wealth of cricket content out there, with Wikipedia becoming a major source of information related to the sport.

The Signpost interviewed project members Harrias, Dweller, SGGH, BlackJack, AssociateAffiliate, Moondyne and Mattinbgn, and asked what motivated them to become members of WikiProject Cricket.

Both Harrias and Dweller were working on cricket articles and as a result, were invited to join the project. SGGH, Jack, AssociateAffiliate, Moondyne and Mattinbgn have all been avid cricket fans since they were young, and it was natural for them to gravitate towards the subject on Wikipedia. Dweller said, "We try to be a friendly bunch and in turn, I often invite others I spot editing about cricket to join the Project. We're good at collaborations, working on important articles and Featured material, and that alone is a good reason to join. I think the work we did, led by YellowMonkey, on "The Invincibles" Featured Topic, is a model of this kind of group editing." Jack has written material on the subject elsewhere, and when he started using Wikipedia, he noticed that there was a lack of coverage prior to the start of Test cricket in 1877, and decided to get involved and rectify that. Long-time member Moondyne added,"I think my very first cricket article was creating a stub on Bill Lawry in late 2004. That led me to join the [then] recently created Cricket project. It's possibly because of the nature of the game that WikiProject Cricket members are the most courteous and helpful bunch of Wikipedians I've come across. Many have come and gone but all have been fine people to collaborate with." Mattinbgn has a reasonable library of cricket books at hand: "It seemed like the one place where I could contribute with an adequate level of background knowledge using high quality sources. It also seemed like a place where collaboration on articles was positively appreciated with little sense of ownership of articles."

With over 20,000 articles associated with the project, how do project members keep up? Everyone agreed that the project benefits from a large number of committed editors. Some, like Harrias, concentrate on specific areas, such as Somerset County Cricket Club. Reinforcing this point, AssociateAffiliate said, "It is all down to the commitment of members, many of whom have contributed answers here and who contribute amazing articles to the project. Last year, I went through all the Hampshire redlinks and created articles for outstanding redlinked players, without going into too much detail on each. But contributors like Harrias can find the most obscure of players and find out so much info about them! My focus is on county cricket and minor international cricket, with thousands of players needing articles, expect that 21,029 to increase rapidly!" There is also good coordination on the project's talk pages, and any urgent matters are dealt with swiftly. "There's such a diversity of interests and we have so many members, it just seems to happen. As long as there are defined and achievable goals, people will gravitate towards completing them," added Moondyne.

We asked how the project managed to get so many articles promoted. Almost all said that YellowMonkey's FA drive for the "The Invincibles" was one major factor. Harrias believes that statistics also play a role; "we are lucky to be writing about a topic about which there is a lot written, and perhaps more importantly, a formal level of recognition (for example, Test cricket), and a lot of statistics. Without those statistics for example, I doubt there would be even half as many FLs. I think the key thing for other projects is to get some formats they are happy with for certain types of articles, formats that have passed FA/FL themselves, and use these as rough templates for any further articles that look to progress along that track. It might not guarantee success, but it certainly helps." For Dweller, the tremendous enthusiasm for the subject helps to generate high quality content; "this is mirrored in the offline world by the enormous publishing industry revolving around cricket. With such a long history – around 300 years of so-called "Major cricket" and about 130 years of "Test match" international cricket – it's unsurprising that there is much to write about. And there is so much quality material freely available on the internet. This, combined with the collaboration mentioned above, is a great basis for developing quality material." Jack offers a different perspective: "I have always taken the view that the project needs quantity because we have far too many redlinks. I would rather see the massive list of biographical redlinks produced by Bobo192 turn blue before we get any FAs. I see the priority to be our breadth of coverage. But all credit to those who have produced prize articles and I would say the main reason for CRIC's success in the FA sphere is "The Invincibles" topic... I must also mention my fellow Yorkie Sarastro1 who has written several major articles working mostly by himself, especially Wilfred Rhodes, an article about a world-class Yorkshire cricketer which I once condemned on its talk page. That was before Sarastro joined us and the article isn't rubbish now."

With a lot of emotions of national pride on the table, how do project members maintain a neutral point of view? Most agree that this is not a problem for them, although it is a concern for SGGH; "Ha... this is my biggest grumble. A lot of articles out there have been written long ago in this emotional flair Wisden-style "his crisp drives like sniffing at a newly mown lawn drew the most poetic of vernacular from astonished supporters" and all that nonsense that fits beautifully into Wisden but not into Wikipedia. So, so many of the articles out there still have this problem, most of them saying "he was the best so-and-so" and so forth. It takes a lot of pruning. You can write with flair and passion in an article and still keep it suitable for Wikipedia..." Dweller believes that much of what is written about precedes the lifetimes of the editors; "The POV is less about national rivalries–as an Englishman, I've contributed far more to Australian biographies than English ones–than trying to avoid hagiography. Fortunately, cricket literature abounds with material about controversies and the foibles of former greats. Even Donald Bradman, whose feats dominate not just cricket history, but arguably, the history of sport, has generated a substantial daughter article about controversies involving him." For Jack the "national pride" is 99% good-natured as the sport itself is the thing and not national affiliation; "Several of my favourite players over the years have been non-English. I admit I write mostly about English cricket because that accounted for nearly the whole sport until the second half of the 19th century, but I have tried to develop coverage of other countries too and wrote outline histories of Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, for example." Despite being a patriotic Englishman, AssociateAffiliate manages to keep well within NPOV, but as for others, "It is one of the more annoying aspects of the project that you can go on, say articles about Sachin Tendulkar and Shakib Al Hasan, they're like patriotic cult worship articles at times, with all sorts of "he is the best", "he is a god" nonsense appearing. Kevin Pietersen and Shane Warne are cricketing gods, but you don't see me include that in their articles! One of the newer cricketing nations, Afghanistan for example, has such a fan following. Thus far I've managed to avoid articles like the Afghanistan national cricket team, or player Hameed Hasan becoming the opposite of NPOV. Hard work, but I'm winning so far!" Moondyne said, "Bias from national pride often appears in hagiographies particularly from the sub-continent and star players like Tendulkar seem to suffer from it the worst. But it's nothing that can't be managed." On the other hand, Mattinbgn believes that national pride is not really an issue among the major contributors, "but dealing with "drive-by vandalism" during big matches and tournaments can be annoying."

We wanted to know what are the most pressing needs for WikiProject Cricket, and what new contributors can do to help. Despite the project having over 20,000 articles, all who were interviewed wanted to see more content. In addition to this, Dweller laments that in addition to the prime need of removing redlinks (listed here), "following some debate, we have just amended our notability criteria, which means we need to review some of our biographies, as some may no longer have the automatic notability of WP:ATHLETE." SGGH thinks that the Project needs more adherence. "We need to be writing neutral, properly worded articles not just flowery phrase-fests. We could always use a few less "no, he is the greatest" arguments over at Tendulkar, Richards and Lara pages, but I suppose they keep up the spice and the interest." Jack would like to see more articles on international matches and tours, while AssociateAffiliate is very concerned about redlinked players: "Over the last year I reckon I've created about 1,000 articles on cricketers. So help in that area would be nice! As of October 2010, the first 10 teams on the redlink list had 2,029 players needing articles. Also, anybody with knowledge of cricket in the smaller cricketing nations of the Associate and Affiliate members of the International Cricket Council." Mattinbgn also thinks that a more geographically diverse group of contributors would help; "Australian and English content is reasonably well developed but other areas of the world have great scope for improvement. The Indian sub-continent is the epicentre of modern cricket, but there are relatively few large-scale contributors from that area of the world. The same applies for South Africa, New Zealand and the West Indies. A more topically diverse set of featured content would also be very welcome. The project is strong on biographies but weaker on venues, seasons, national, sub-national and club teams and "national articles" such as Cricket in South Africa."

When asked if there were any final words, there was friendly banter regarding the recent Ashes series, which was won by England. Moondyne brought up the Wikipedia Cricket Quiz, which has been running for over five years with 1,275 questions posed and answered: "I guess it to be the most popular cricket quiz in the world and has led to countless improvements to Wikipedia articles." For Mattinbgn, WikiProjects such as WikiProject Cricket are great pools of in-depth knowledge about their subjects and as such, a very useful resource for Wikipedia. Those editors who focus on site-wide systems and standards such as templates, categories, Manual of Style, etc. could make much better use of these projects by speaking to them before proposing major changes in areas for topics covered by these projects. I think that WikiProject Cricket has been very approachable when its views are sought in a cooperative, collaborative manner."

Next week, we'll catch up with the 51st state of the United States where the license plates read "taxation without representation." Until then, take a self-guided tour of the WikiProject International Archives.

• 
  International Cricket Council member nations
• 
  The Ashes is a Test cricket series played between England and Australia; considered one of the most celebrated rivalries in international cricket, it dates back to 1882. The original urn is kept at the Marylebone Cricket Club Museum at Lord's.
• 
  The Royal Grammar School, Guildford, was the site for cricket's earliest definite reference

Reader comments

2011-01-17

First featured picture from the legally disputed National Portrait Gallery images; two Chicago icons

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Tony1 and Dabomb87

New featured picture: a poster advertising "A century of progress", the world fair held in Chicago in 1933 to celebrate the city's centennial. The theme of the fair was technological innovation.

From the new featured article: The Monadnock Building, an icon of Chicago architecture

This week's "Features and admins" covers Saturday 8 – Friday 14 January 2011 (UTC)

New administrators

The Signpost welcomes our two new admins:

• Ironholds (nom), has been a Wikipedia editor since early 2006 and has experience in WP:CSD and WP:AFD. His particular interest is current English law, and English legal history; he says among his best work is a featured article he "brought up from almost nothing", Court of Chancery.
• Lear's Fool (nom) has been editing since late 2009, and has worked on vandalfighting, NPP, article writing, and referencing other people's contributions. He has recently been active at the Unreferenced BLP cleanup drive.

At the time of publication there was one live RfA: GiantSnowman, due to finish 21 January.

Featured articles

Five articles were promoted to featured status:

• Monadnock Building (nom), which has a special place in the history of Chicago architecture. The largest office building in the world when constructed 1891–93, it became the first example in a movement during the 20th century to remodel old skyscrapers as a means to preserve them, and one of the most ambitious office building restoration projects ever undertaken (Nasty Housecat; picture at top).
• Royal Maundy (nom), "one of those quirky British ceremonies which fascinate everyone", says nominator Wehwalt. "I believe it has survived as is because of the enthusiasm of the Queen, and ... this may well be the best resource on the ceremony out there, as the two books I'm aware of on the ceremony are a bit dated." (picture at right)
• Opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway (nom)—not the dull article you might think: within 20 years, Britain was a democratically ruled industrial and military superpower, Manchester was the focal point of the world economy, and the rising nations of Prussia, Russia and the United States were coming to see the implications of being able to move large numbers of people at short notice (Iridescent).
• Hill 303 massacre (nom), a war crime on 17 August 1950 during the Korean War on a hill above Waegwan, South Korea, in which 41 US Army prisoners of war were machine-gunned by members of the North Korean People's Army (Ed!).
• Thistle, Utah (nom), a ghost town in Utah about 105 km (65 mi) southeast of Salt Lake City. (Moabdave).

Choice of the week. We asked FA nominator/reviewer EdChem for his choice of the best FA this week:

"Trying to choose a "best" FA from such a variety of topics is almost inevitably subjective, so I've chosen to base my decision on what I found most interesting. I was looking for an article that caught and held my attention, that made me want to keep reading. I was impressed by the Monadnock Building article, and was surprised that so much documented history could be squeezed into one building. I was intrigued by the Hill 303 massacre article, as it described a part of Korean War history of which I was unaware. And I certainly agree with the description of Royal Maundy as "one of those quirky British ceremonies which fascinate everyone".

My choice, however, is the article on the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway which describes the most eventful opening of a railway line that one might imagine. I'd generally expect that 105 kB for an article on the opening of a railway line would be overkill, or (let's be honest) dull. But with a derailment, an unrelated fatality, a Prime Minister pelted with vegetables, a world land speed record, a politician resigning on an issue of a lack of representation for his constituents, a funeral attended by an estimated 69,000 people. and the opportunity to a learn a new word ("deodand"), this article has plenty to hold your interest. Kudos to Iridescent: this is an impressive article and well worth taking the time to read."

Featured lists

Five lists were promoted:

• List of battleships of the Ottoman Empire (nom) (nominated by White Shadows)
• List of X-Men video games (nom) (Guyinblack25, Nomader and -5-).
• List of leaders of the Soviet Union (nom) (Trust Is All You Need; picture at right).
• List of Oslo Tramway and Metro operators (nom) (Arsenikk; picture at bottom).
• Grammy Award for Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance (nom) (Another Believer).

Two featured lists were delisted:

• List of YuYu Hakusho episodes (season 1) (nom: referencing, comprehensiveness, lead)
• 109th United States Congress (nom: referencing, comprehensiveness)

Featured topics

One topic was promoted:

• König class battleships (nom), with three featured articles and two good articles. The Königs were the last class of completed German dreadnoughts built before World War I. The four Königs saw heavy service during the war, including their leading of the German line at the Battle of Jutland (nominator Parsecboy).

One featured topic, Celebration, was delisted for insufficient coverage of the topic.

Featured pictures

Eight images were promoted. Medium-sized images can be viewed by clicking on "nom":

• Lady Margaret Beaufort (nom; related article) (1443–1509), "a remarkable and important woman. This more medieval style isn't something we see a lot at FPC", said nominator J Milburn. The image is from a set gathered by User:Dcoetzee from the website of the National Portrait Gallery, London, using a special tool. In 2009, this action resulted in legal threats by the Gallery that were rebuffed by the Wikimedia Foundation (see Signpost coverage); a National Portrait Gallery (NPG) representative discussed the affair at the GLAM-WIKI conference last month (Signpost coverage). The authorship of all images in this batch is unknown. picture at right
• Century of Progress (nom; related article), a poster depicting the architectural symbol of this technology-themed centennial for the city, the Sky Ride, a transporter bridge perpendicular to the shore on which one could ride from one side of the fair to the other (created by Weimer Pursell, restored by Jujutacular; picture at top).
• Maxim Gorky (nom; related article) (1868–1936), a monochrome film copy negative of the Russian novelist taken in 1906 Fallschirmjäger; picture at right).
• Tonna galea (nom; related article), a large sea snail found in seas around New Zealand up to depths of 35 metres. Its saliva contains 2–4% sulfuric acid, which enables it to kill its prey, sea stars (created by H. Zell).
• Divine conch (nom; related article), an Indian Ocean species considered to be sacred in Hinduism and Buddhism; it is one of the eight "auspicious symbols". The live animal is notable for having gills and an operculum (created by H. Zell).
• James Webb Space Telescope Mirror Production (nom; related article), shot at the X-ray and Cryogenic Facility at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, during the production of the mirrors for the James Webb Space Telescope before the final gold coating and just before the cryogenic testing. The photographer used specialised filters on the flash to make the industrial sterilised environment of the clean-room seem more dynamic and interesting than it would have been if it was shot with natural light (created by NASA/MSFC/David Higginbotham/Emmett Given).
• Panellus stipticus (nom; related article), a common and widely distributed species of bioluminescent fungi that grows on decaying deciduous trees, especially beech, oak, and birch. The bioluminescent effect seen here is called foxfire. The photo was taken at 800 ISO with an eight-minute exposure. A flashlight was used to add highlight lighting on the tree trunk (created by Ylem).
• Richea scoparia (nom; related article), photographed between Waterfall Valley and Lake Holmes, Cradle Mountain, in Lake St Clair National Park, Tasmania. The spike is around 6 cm high (created by Noodle snacks).

Information about new admins at the top is drawn from their user pages and RfA texts, and occasionally from what they tell us directly.

Reader comments

2011-01-17

New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Ncmvocalist and Ohconfucius

The Arbitration Committee opened one new case. Two cases are now open.

Open cases

Shakespeare authorship question (Week 1)

The filer, LessHeard vanU (talk · contribs), alleged that there was a sustained and possibly coordinated campaign to have the article, Shakespeare authorship question, reflect a certain point of view. Concerns about tendentious editing, ownership, and attempted outing were also raised. Drafter Newyorkbrad noted that evidence should be submitted within a week, and set 30 January 2011 as target date for a decision.

Update: an extension of one week has been provided for evidence submissions and the target date for a decision.

Longevity (Week 8)

Further evidence submissions were made during the week, including shortly after the evidence phase was set to close (see Signpost coverage from 11 January 2011). Since 25 November 2010, no editors have submitted any proposals in the workshop. During the week, analysis of evidence was received from one party, but no proposed final decisions were received from any editor.

The information reflects the state of cases at the time of publication.

Reader comments

2011-01-17

January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news

Contribute  —  

Share this

•  E-mail
•  Facebook
•  Twitter
•  LinkedIn
•  Reddit
•  Digg

By Jarry1250 and Tilman Bayer

January Engineering Update published

The Foundation's Engineering Update for January (and covering the activities of December) was published last week on the Wikimedia Techblog, giving a brief overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in the last month. It summarised the developments:

“

In December, the fundraiser was in full swing, with a portion of the Engineering team... supporting the fundraising infrastructure. Danese Cooper [CTO], Erik Möller [Deputy Director], and Alolita Sharma were in India for most of the month, while much of the rest of the team was focused on the ramp-up to MediaWiki 1.17.

”

In addition to the increasing focus on the 1.17 release of the MediaWiki software and other major developments covered in recent editions of the Signpost, a number of items had their statuses updated since the last Engineering Update. For example, as touched upon in the report's executive summary, technicians travelled to India during the month "to assess technical gaps to success in India." The report noted some of the conclusions of this work: "some areas of localization were identified to standardize on Indic language wikis, such as editing tools and font rendering... [and] offline reading was a recurring topic". In other news, an invitation-only "data summit", cancelled last year, was rescheduled for early February; work progressed rapidly on a new "virtualization cluster" for improved testing; a minor update to the "pending changes" software was released; and a contract was signed with PediaPress to add openZim support to the Collection (PDF-generating) extension. Developers are also looking into better integrating with Kiwix to provide offline copies of Wikipedia to areas with poor or patchy internet coverage, including India.

December also saw the appointment of CT Woo as the Foundation's new Director of Technical Operations (Signpost coverage). The position of "bugmeister" - overseeing the creation and maintenance of bug reports - was removed from the hiring list, but without an appointment. Developer Robert Lanphier explained the decision (wikitech-l mailing list):

“

We talked to some excellent candidates, but we found it was a trickier spot to fill than we first anticipated, and that we need to rethink our hiring order a little bit. However, as was pointed out on IRC, we've had this hire in our plan for quite some time, and the need is pretty great. Rather than just continue to let this work go undone, we've asked Mark Hershberger (a man of many hats) to step in and fill this role while we sort out our longer term plan. After he wraps up his work on the 1.17 release, he's going to dive into the bug database and start sorting.

”

Hackaton in the Netherlands

This week also saw a get-together of GLAM (Galleries-Libraries-Archives-Museums) staff, Wikipedia contributors and MediaWiki hackers in the Netherlands (Gerard Meijssen, TheDJ). The meetup, timed to coincide with Wikipedia's tenth anniversary (see this week's "News and notes", saw a number of topics discussed and work completed:

“

Robert has started work to get [the "Rewrite" branch of] pywikipedia enabled in translatewiki.net. the statistics for our GLAM partners are being looked at a prototype was built for importing images from the CMS (Content Management System) of a GLAM a sentence level editor was demonstrated; the best bit is that usability studies determine its functionality a first upload button from Open Images to MediaWiki was hacked together

”

According to Ziko, the Wikisnaps tool coded by TheDJ "has a good chance to become the most famous result [of the Hack-a-ton]: With this Apple App, you can take a photograph with your iPhone and upload it within a few seconds to Wikimedia Commons. An Android version is about to come. At the presentation, this tool received a long warm applause."

In brief

Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.

• MediaWiki version 1.16.1 (a minor version with security and other smaller fixes built in) was released (MediaWiki-l mailing list).
• The API now supports querying on the system of category member types introduced in August, allowing for separate retrieval of subcategories, files, and pages (bug #24650).
• The "Firefogg" Firefox extension was updated to work with newer beta releases of Firefox - beta 7 and after (bug #25926).
• Categories which used to contain members (but now don't) will no longer be indexed, for example by Google (bug #26729).
• A parallelised "dump" of the English Wikipedia was commenced for the first time since October (Server admin log, follow progress).
• An outage that put all Wikimedia wikis into read-only mode last week was noted by Erictric [9] and ReadWriteWeb [10], but soon resolved (cf. announcements by CTO Danese Cooper on Twitter [11] [12]).
• The "West Coast Wikiconference" in San Francisco, like the Amsterdam event held on the occasion of Wikipedia's anniversary, saw a session on Non-Textual Media editing, discussing some technical aspects and outlooks of video editing on Wikimedia projects.
  
  Reader comments
  

If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.

Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add {{Signpost-subscription}}.

Home

About

Archives

Newsroom

Subscribe

Suggestions