The Signpost
Single-page Edition
WP:POST/1
20 September 2010

From the editorNew ways to read and share the Signpost
News and notes
Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
In the news
Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
WikiProject report
All Aboard WikiProject Trains
Features and admins
The best of the week
Dispatches
Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
Arbitration report
Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
Technology report
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/From the editors Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/Traffic report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/In the media


2010-09-20

Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Washington DC "Hack-a-Ton" announced

On the Wikimedia Techblog, contractor Chad Horohoe announced the first Wikimedia "hack-a-ton", an event when developers, amateur and professional, get together with the explicit aim of bug-fixing and generally getting "down and dirty with the code". Designed to act as a counterpoint to the "MediaWiki Developers' Meetup" in Berlin, which is focused on demonstrations, workshops and small group discussions, the event is scheduled for October 22–24 in Washington DC. Bugs for the weekend are going to be tracked using a new keyword in Bugzilla, "bugsmash". MediaWiki has around 4900 bugs and feature requests outstanding from a total pool of around 25000, though not all relate to the core MediaWiki software.

Google Summer of Code: Samuel Lampa

We continue a series of articles about this year's Google Summer of Code (GSoC) with Samuel Lampa, a biotechnology student at Uppsala University, who describes his project to develop a system for the general import and export of RDF metadata from the Semantic MediaWiki software.

In brief

Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/Opinion


2010-09-20

Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes

Dutch National Archives donate images

From the Dutch National Archives: LJ Brinkhorst talks to fellow politicians from an unusual position during the 1977 negotiations to form a new cabinet in The Hague
The National Archives of the Netherlands and the Spaarnestad Photographic Foundation have announced a major donation, being made available via Wikimedia Commons, of more than 1000 images depicting significant events and people in Dutch politics, mostly since World War II. The images were mainly taken from the collections of the former press agency ANEFO and the Spaarnestad Foundation. Almost half of them are already available on Commons.

Much of the Spaarnestad collection of some 2.5 million images dating back to the late 19th century narrowly escaped destruction in the mid-1980s, when the original publishing house experienced a financial and housing crisis. But prompt action by the newly formed non-profit Spaarnestad Foundation saved this priceless record of modern Dutch history. Private benefactors and the City of Haarlem provided funds for the interim location of the collection, which was transferred to the National Archives in 2008.

The donation is part of the Archive's Images for the Future project to preserve and digitise visual materials, and to make them publicly available, and was the result of a collaboration with Wikimedia Nederland. One of the most significant gifts of historical images ever made to the Wikimedia Foundation, it was marked at a public event in The Hague attended by several current and former politicians, who shared their personal memories surrounding specific images now freely available at Commons. A spokesperson for the Archives said, "Wikipedia is a good, reliable and social platform, and our goal is to disseminate our materials as widely as possible."

Lodewijk Gelauff, Vice Chair of Wikimedia Nederland, said "This generous release will provide photos for many related Wikipedia articles that until now had no image to accompany the article.... One of the best ways to get a good photo is through partnerships like this. [I hope] that soon more institutions will follow the example of the National Archive.... I invite everybody to incorporate the images on their language projects as they become available in the near future on Wikimedia Commons."

Paris to Cape North "raid": 300 nordic images for Commons

The raiders Wikimobile in the Geirangerfjord.

In July, French-speaking Wikimedians Ludo29 and Inisheer took part in the "Raid Paris – Cap Nord", a photographic challenge where competitors are ranked by a jury on the basis of the pictures they take during the trip. The journey starts in Paris, goes through Finland, Sweden and Norway, up to North Cape in Norway, the northernmost point of Europe, and ends back in Paris. Over the four weeks, the raiders drove 12,000 km in a car branded with the logos of Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and Wikimédia France. The French chapter provided financial support.

The two Wikimedians took around 300 photographs of landscapes, buildings, fauna and flora of these nordic countries, many of which filled gaps in the Commons. The Wikimedians produced content for Wikinews, including an interview of Philippe Boucher (Google translation), creator and organiser of the raid; they also wrote a report about lifeboatmen in Norway (Google translation).

The Wikimedian team was ranked seventh out of 22 teams in the challenge. The Wikimedia logos on their car provided opportunities to talk with local people about the Foundation and its projects.

Briefly

  • New Pending Changes poll: Following his announcement about the Pending Changes feature (see last week's News and notes) and ensuing discussions, Jimbo Wales has started a "Straw poll on interim usage". The new poll will run until September 27 and is about deciding whether the current implementation of the feature should remain in place until the release (planned for November 9) of a new version that is to address some common concerns. See also a collection of earlier Signpost coverage of the Pending Changes trial since June.
  • Controversial content: Robert Harris and Dory Carr-Harris, commissioned by the Board to provide recommendations on how to handle material on Wikimedia projects that may be considered objectionable (Signpost coverage), have posted a draft of the first part of their "study of controversial content". It identifies "intellectual openness" and "service to the public" as two basic Wikimedia principles which may sometimes be in conflict, and posits that "Wikimedia projects serve the information needs of individuals, not groups", meaning that intellectual openness should not be restricted on the basis of demands from institutions. Comments and questions are welcome on the talk page.
  • Community Fellows: The Wikimedia Foundation's recently formed Community Department has announced a new "Community Fellowship program", following its earlier "Community hiring" call (see Signpost coverage), which according to Chief Community Officer Zack Exley has received almost 2000 submissions. Fellows are to "lead intensive, time-limited projects focused on key areas of risk and opportunity", with some of them possibly joining the permanent WMF staff later. The first Fellow is User:Steven Walling, a longtime Wikipedian and administrator on the English Wikipedia and Commons. As of September 15, the projects for his year-long fellowship hadn't been announced yet, but last month Walling already started to collaborate with the Foundation on the Contribution Taxonomy Project (see Signpost coverage).
  • Transparent language discussions: The Language Committee, which deals with requests to establish new language wikis, announced that its discussions will be publicly archived by default, starting from September 12. Previously, two of its members had objected to the publication of their comments, which had led to much criticism in a Foundation-l thread last month. On his blog, committee member GerardM said that "the reason for our confidentiality has been largely taken away".
  • Essay series on Wikimedia: Eugene Eric Kim (User:Eekim), the Program Manager for the Wikimedia Foundation's Strategic Planning Project, has published the first of a series of four blog posts about the Wikimedia movement and its challenges, on the website of his consultancy firm "Blue Oxen Associates": Wikimedia: What is it? Where is it headed? (See also Eekim's Signpost article "The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community")
  • IRC office hours: The log of Sue Gardner's public chat on September 16 has been posted.
    Erling Mandelmann

  • Portrait photos donated: Earlier this month, Danish photographer Erling Mandelmann donated almost 600 pictures in low-resolution versions from his four-decade career as a photojournalist and portrait photographer. They are expected to be useful as illustrations in many articles about notable people.

  • GLAM conference: Wikimedia UK has announced the "GLAM-WIKI conference" on collaboration between the cultural sector and Wikimedia, which will take place on November 26/27 at the British Museum, earlier this year the host of a "Wikipedian in Residence" (Signpost coverage: June 7, March 15). The keynote speakers will be author Cory Doctorow, Wikimedia's Sue Gardner, and Kenneth Crews, director of Columbia University's Copyright Advisory Office.
  • New chapter director: Wikimedia Hong Kong has announced that Tango Chan has become the chapter's new Director and Commissioner for Communications, after the previous Director, Morgan Chan, stepped down to concentrate on his academic planning.
  • Wikipedia Goes To Africa: A press release by Wikimedia Israel, titled Wikipedia Goes To Africa, describes how the chapter supported a group of Israeli students on a three-month humanitarian expedition to Benin and Cameroon, by providing them with computers containing a static version of the French language Wikipedia.
  • German Wikipedia manual: In a short blog-post, Ziko described how he wrote a manual on how to contribute to the German Wikipedia, which was released by a Munich-based publisher last month and is also available on Wikibooks. It is illustrated by photos of "Wikipedia youngsters" enacting Wikipedia concepts (example: vandal fighting).
  • Supporting free knowledge outside Wikimedia projects: Wikimedia Germany has started a "contest of ideas" to promote free knowledge, promising grants of €500–5000 for projects that generate, collect, or disseminate free content (announcement, in German: WissensWert, Google translation). The scope appears to be deliberately wide, naming OpenStreetMap or free software as examples, and the conditions explicitly exclude proposals whose sole purpose it is to generate content in Wikipedia or its sister projects.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/In focus


2010-09-20

Discretionary sanctions clarification and more

The Arbitration Committee opened no new cases, leaving one open.

Open case

Climate change (Week 15)

This case resulted from the merging of several Arbitration requests on the same topic into a single case, and the failure of a related request for comment to make headway. Innovations have been introduced for this case, including special rules of conduct that were put in place at the start. However, the handling of the case has been criticized by some participants; for example, although the evidence and workshop pages were closed for an extended period, no proposals were posted on the proposed decision page and participants were prevented from further discussing their case on the case pages (see earlier Signpost coverage).

The proposed decision, drafted by Newyorkbrad, Risker, and Rlevse, sparked a large quantity of unstructured discussion, much of it comprising concerns about the proposed decision (see earlier Signpost coverage). A number of users, including participants and arbitrator Carcharoth, made the discussion more structured, but the quantity of discussion has continued to increase significantly. Rlevse had said that arbitrators were trying to complete the proposed decision before September 6, but it was later made clear that he will no longer be voting on this decision. This week, arbitrators made further additions to the proposed decision and further attempts to manage the quantity of discussion.

Closed cases

Before discretionary sanctions can be imposed on an editor, the editor is required to be "given a warning advising of the problems with his or her editing". Additionally, where appropriate, the editor should be "counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve" his or her editing. The exception to this requirement is where there is "gross misconduct".

Littleolive oil filed a clarification request regarding this requirement and asked that the revert restriction that was imposed on her by Future Perfect at Sunrise be overturned by the Committee. A few users characterised the request as “forum shopping” and arbitrator Coren alleged that it was “not a request for clarification...but an appeal/protest.” However, the filer stated that the clarification fundamentally affects the restriction and that the Committee should stand by its statements - that discretionary sanctions may be appealed to the Committee.

Arbitrators Newyorkbrad and Roger Davies clarified that the warnings should come from "a neutral third-party" rather than "an opponent in a content dispute". In response, an administrator suggested that the discretionary sanctions from this case be replaced with what some arbitrators refer to as “standard discretionary sanctions”. However, practical issues with the latter approach were pointed out in the Climate change case:

The "standard" sanctions have changed to some extent every time that the Committee has used them, so they're hardly standard. As the wording on that page changes, editors in affected areas will have no way of knowing that the "rules" have changed. This will also lead to disputes about whether the current wording of the so-called standard discretionary sanctions, or the one in effect at the time of the decision, will hold sway. [Even with announcements of changes]...sanctions cover hundreds of pages and potentially apply to thousands of editors. Most of them don't watch WP:AN or the village pumps, and even fewer of them watch arbitration pages.

In light of the clarification, the filer suggested the Committee keep the existing discretionary sanctions wording for this case because it “clearly defines the criteria” making it “easier to determine if the criteria has been met or not”. Recently, she also asked the Committee whether she will need to file another case to deal with the "allegations of wrongdoing" and editors that were "improperly sanctioned".

At the time of writing, arbitrators have not yet responded to the request to reimpose an Eastern European topic ban on Radeksz. It has been over a week since the request was filed.

Arbitrators have responded to the request to impose a topic ban on Ferahgo the Assassin from race and intelligence related articles that has been filed. It has been over a week since the request was filed. Kirill Lokshin stated that he did not see any reason to presume wrong-doing, but Shell Kinney advised Ferahgo the Assassin to avoid editing the topic, particularly in light of policy and the facts of this case. Roger Davies also stated that he would support a topic ban. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-09-20/Humour

If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.

















Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2010-09-20