The Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser continued this week. Seventy-two days into the fundraiser, about 43,300 people have donated at least US$1, and the Foundation has raised about $1,450,000.
Donations this week rose; this may be partially due to the end of the year, where donations traditionally rise as taxpayers seek end-of-year deductions. Donations also were affected by a New Year's Day matching contributions promise; the anonymous donor has offered up to $50,000.
Anonymous donations of $5,000, $2,500, $2,100, $2,000 and JP¥250,000 ($2,183.25), and a $2,250 donation from Francis Hogle led the unusually busy week of donations. Six other large contributions, all of $1,000, were received; four were anonymous, and Michael Webb and Gary Steinmetz each donated $1,000 as well.
Wikimania 2009 bidding continues
Wikimania 2009 bidding continues; one more bid was submitted this week: Buenos Aires. This joins three other official bids: Bogotá, Kathmandu, Nepal, and Toronto. New bids will be open until January 12, at which time the jury will be announced. Bids already created will be open until February 3, when bidding will end, and deliberations will begin. On or before February 20, the host city for Wikimania 2009 will be announced to the public.
A new page has been created for soliciting freely-licensed photos of celebrities. The page directs celebrities or their agents to e-mail an OTRS queue, suggesting that the photos be licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike license.
On Tuesday, January 8, editor and administrator Jonathan Hochman will give a lecture ("Wikipedia & Social Media") at the Tumblebrook Country Club in Bloomfield, Connecticut. The event will run from 6:30-9 p.m. The cost is $45 per person; the price includes dinner and cocktails.
Wikipedia wars: Who decides what to include? - The debate between inclusionists, who feel that there are no space restrictions, and deletionists, who believe that quality comes before quantity, rages on. Wikipedia administrator Andrew Lih said that it was developing a "soup Nazi culture", and that he felt the tide turning recently regarding what was considered acceptable. Lih, who was once considered a deletionist, is now considered an inclusionist, after a dispute over one of his articles. Regardless of which camp rules the day, Wikipedia's deletion procedures are open for all to see.
Wikipedia quick on Bhutto updates
See for example The implications of Bhutto's murder and Bhutto, at the speed of Wiki... - Amongst the media storm over the death of Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto, Wikipedia was mentioned as being very quick to update her biography. Apparently, it took Wikipedia just 10 minutes from the announcement of her death to change "is" to "was", and another author found Wikipedia useful as a news source, because it was updated frequently, with references. A warning flag at the top of the article indicated that events were still unfolding.
Other mentions
Other recent mentions in the online press include:
The Google Algorithm Is Changing - The Google search algorithm might now be giving more weight to newer publications, and this might affect the rankings of Wikipedia articles.
What are some of the project's most recent achievements?
A: In November 2007 I became an approved uploader for Veropedia and have uploaded our better articles. Our better articles are shown here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Article showcase. Also see WP:SCOUT--which lists our admins, major tasks, etc, we have a "todo" page too.
How can project members be recognized for outstanding contributions?
Two articles and one list were delisted last week:
Ludwig Wittgenstein (nom) — Promoted in April 2004, the article was delisted due to insufficient references and a substandard lead section. Although some work was put into improving the article, after two months it was still not of featured standard and was delisted.
Carl G. Fisher (nom) — Promoted in March 2005, the review noted issues with referencing. Without any efforts to fix issues found with the article, it was delisted.
Lists of mathematics topics (nom) — the review noted a lack of references; with no improvement of the list, it was removed.
This is a summary of recent technology and site configuration changes that affect the English Wikipedia. Note that not all changes described here are necessarily live as of press time; the English Wikipedia is currently running version 1.44.0-wmf.17 (1abfde3), and changes to the software with a version number higher than that will not yet be active. Configuration changes and changes to interface messages, however, become active immediately.
Pages with HTML entities in their name (such as [[<]]) are now invalid titles (such titles didn't work beforehand anyway, and just caused bugs). (r28968, bug 3097)
A bug causing Special:Makesysop (a bureaucrat-only page) to stop working when Special:Userrights (another bureaucrat-only page that performs the same function, among others) was enabled was fixed. (r29092)
New features
A new generalised set of code for adding and removing user rights has been adopted. The code is currently set to allow exactly the same user rights changes as before (bureaucrats can make users into administrators, bureaucrats, and/or bots, and remove the bot flag from users; other changes require a steward), but it is now possible to easily fulfil requests for other permission combinations (so that, for instance, administrators could be allowed to grant or remove rollback from users), although such configuration changes still need to be made by a shell user. Bureaucrats can now use Special:Userrights as an alternative method of altering a user's rights (this is the same page that stewards use, but is less functional for bureaucrats). (r28650, bug 11645)
Configuration changes
The Title Blacklist extension was enabled on Wikimedia wikis, allowing the creation of pages matching certain regular expressions to be forbidden by administrators via MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. This is in addition to the protection of nonexistent pages, which should be used instead if only one page title is to be blacklisted.
Ongoing news
Internationalisation has been continuing as normal; help is always appreciated! See mw:Localisation statistics for how complete the translations of languages you know are, and post any updates to bugzilla or use Betawiki.
The Arbitration Committee opened one new case this week, and closed two cases, leaving four cases currently open.
Closed cases
RodentofDeath: A case involving alleged personal attacks and policy violations by RodentofDeath on articles including Angeles City. As a result of the case, RodentofDeath was banned for one year, and Susanbryce reminded not to use Wikipedia for purposes of advocacy.
Episodes and characters: A case involving alleged misconduct with regard to the notability of episodes and characters from television series. As a result of the case, the parties are urged to work collaboratively to seek consensus on the issue.
Dbachmann: A case involving alleged misconduct on the part of administrator Dbachmann and editing by other users on several race-related articles. Arbitrator Kirill Lokshin has proposed remedies banning Bakasuprman and Deeceevoice, admonishing Dbachmann not to use administrator tools in editing disputes, and placing Afrocentrism on article probation.
Case suspended
Matthew Hoffman: A case involving controversial blocks of MatthewHoffman by a vanished user. Various remedies were proposed including either desysopping or admonishing the vanished user and annotating Matthew Hoffman's block log to reflect the arbitrators' view that the blocks were unjustified. A motion has been passed suspending the case for 30 days (until approximately 20 January , 2008) to allow for community input at a request for comment.