The Signpost

Documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

This template uses Lua:

Module:Template parameter value (sandbox)

Newsroom/Task

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Task is transcluded mostly by Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom. It is a wrapper for Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Task/core.

Newsroom/Task/Core

Of particular note is a series of preload templates this invokes for the "create" links.

News and notes	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/NAN
In the media	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/ITN
Featured content	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/FC
Next featured content	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/FC
Next month's featured content	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/FC
Technology report	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Tech-preload
Blog	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/Blog
Traffic report	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload/Traffic
#default	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload

Comments

This template uses section transclusion to automatically show the comments from Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom. This corresponds to the task name, so that e.g. "News and Notes" will try to transclude Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom#News and notes. If there's no section, you can create one at that title on the talk page and it will show up.

Usage

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Task
|Task=News and notes
|Status=
|Notes=
}}

produces this:

News and notes

In progress · 4,283b
last edited 2025-10-31 20:39:34 by Bri.public
Resources

Checklist

N Headline
N Subheading
N Ready for copyedit
N Copyedit done
N Final approval by editor-in-chief

Discussion

(The comment below was moved from Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/News and notes. It looks like the customary Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Use newsroom template had been accidentally deleted there a while ago, which might be why Sdkb ended up leaving this comment in the wrong place - although they should also have seen an edit notice saying the same; if that failed to show, that might be a bug worth investigating. Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Apology letter entry

@Bri, the entry on the apology letter currently reads a bit as if she's apologizing for the board's decision, but on clicking through I see she's actually apologizing for a previous email she sent about it. Could we clarify that (and maybe also link to the previous email)? Sdkb ^talk 19:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Skdb: Friendly reminder that while you may or may not be be acting on a volunteer impetus here, it might behoove you to disclose in such exhortations to the Signpost that you are also a member of the Wikimedia Foundation's Movement Communications team according to User:Sdkb-WMF (albeit not disclosed at m:Wikimedia Foundation/Communications/Movement Communications#The team), which presumably has been quite busy with this Board candidates affair in recent weeks.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HaeB, that's a reasonable ask. To clarify, I'm acting entirely in my volunteer capacity here — no one asked me to comment, and I've long had upcoming issue Signpost pages on my watchlist and offered copy edits such as the above. If I were doing anything related to my WMF contracting, I would use my WMF account (per my userpage disclaimer). But given the potential confusion, I'll step back from these sorts of suggestions.

I'll reply to your parenthetical about the staff list at your cross-post.

Cheers, Sdkb ^talk 23:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your understanding. To clarify just in case, my recommendation was about disclosure, not about refraining from such comments altogether. (In this particular case, while you are of course correct that this personal vs. board apology distinction is important, I would also agree with Bri below that this was maybe a bit to soon for an intervention, also because this very early draft didn't even convey such a wrong interpretation.)

Regards, HaeB (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, that text is just a placeholder virtually copied from a Signpost talkpage. I plan to return to it for polishing. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above documentation is transcluded from Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Task/doc.