A slightly thinner issue, but out on time.

Is a missing article on a Nobel laureate a fail? What if her draft biography was declined as non-notable?

And it's richer than ever.

Breitbart begone; rescued by archivists; celebrating trolls?

Plus: two pending changes-related discussions, notability, and naming conventions.

Who's reading what?

Bots can do anything you want – well, almost.

WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers.

SPARQL adds sparkle to WMF projects.

We are all writing for Amazon.

No special effects here, just beautiful celestial images.

If it weren't free, of course.

Wikipedia has a long history of talk page tomfoolery.

The reviewer who declined the article gives his perspective.

The "holy-shit" slide.