Perspectives from other projects

What would Wikipedia be like if it did things differently? Had different standards for article inclusion? Different policies for non-free content? A different approach to dealing with problematic behavior? Simply a different group of core users who shaped its policies and community culture from the beginning?

Experiments like this have been run over and over in the form of the 262 different language versions of Wikipedia. Andrew Lih's The Wikipedia Revolution and Andrew Dalby's The World and Wikipedia have valuable but brief sections exploring what things are like on a handful of other projects, and first-hand accounts appear now and then in blogs and mailing list posts. The better English Wikipedia articles on specific language editions also provide some useful comparative insight. (The ones with significant original research are the most useful in this regard, although they may become less so as they are cleaned up.) However, on the whole very few cross-language comparisons (in English, at least) have been put down in writing. Hopefully we can change that.

The Signpost is calling for editors active in one or more non-English Wikipedias to write accounts comparing governance, process and policy, and editing culture across languages. The key questions are: how is it different working on another Wikipedia?; and what could English Wikipedia learn from that project—and vice versa?

Please list your comparison essays, or your plans for them, at the opinion desk. While you are there, you can read and comment on some of the other draft opinion content in development. As always, the Signpost is looking for new contributors, and there are more ways than ever to get involved; in addition to the opinion desk, there are open-ended writing opportunities at the review desk and the interviews desk, or you can stop by the revamped newsroom to pitch in on the next issue. Of course, comments, news tips, and story proposals are always appreciated at the tip line.

Finally, thanks sincerely to all the Signpost readers who have been using the new comments section so passionately, and thanks to User:Pretzels for designing and implementing it.

In this issue

12 October 2009 (all comments)

From the editor

Memorial and Collaboration

Bing search

News and notes

In the news

Dispatches

Discussion report

WikiProject report

Features and admins

Arbitration report

Technology report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

• I was going to do a signpost article on the FAC process at other language wikis, and then an article on just that came out while I was working on it. In any case, I asked (in English, unfortunately) some foreign users who have accounts here to describe their FAC process, and here's what they said. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• There's also m:Category:Wikimedia projects coordination which should be improved. (Remember to add at least some links from Meta to your articles.) --Nemo 12:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]