Editor's note: The Wikipedia Signpost is an independent, community newspaper, and is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. Any comments published on this page are the opinions of their author alone, and do not reflect the opinion of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Ryan Jordan, also known as Essjay and newly appointed as a member of the Arbitration Committee a week ago, has resigned his positions and announced his departure from Wikipedia. This comes after The New Yorker, which interviewed him as part of a feature on Wikipedia last July, corrected its description of the fake persona Jordan had given the magazine. Ironically, this is another side of the Internet's potential anonymity once highlighted by The New Yorker itself, in a famous cartoon captioned, "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog."

For a long time, Jordan did not disclose his identity, but described himself as a "tenured professor of theology at a private university in the eastern United States" and said he had four academic degrees in that field. In the meantime, he was a very active Wikipedia editor and became an administrator, bureaucrat, mediator, and received access to the checkuser and oversight functions. The New Yorker article by Stacy Schiff mentioned Jordan having degrees in theology and canon law and also talked about how he "often takes his laptop to class, so that he can be available to Wikipedians while giving a quiz."

Later revelations indicated that Jordan was 24 years old and living in Louisville, Kentucky. He had attended several colleges in the area, but did not possess the degrees he had claimed or teach at a university.

As an explanation for the fake persona, Jordan pointed to the problem of people trying to harass and stalk Wikipedia editors. This concern implicitly included the work of people like Wikipedia critic Daniel Brandt, although the persona predates Brandt's Wikipedia-related activity by several months. As Rogers Cadenhead discovered, Jordan alluded to having a Ph.D. in his fourth edit to Wikipedia, in April 2005. The statement was in a post to a talk page in support of his very first edit two months earlier.

For his part, Brandt helped bring the discrepancy to the attention of The New Yorker. As a result, last week the magazine explained what happened in an editors' note: "Essjay was recommended to Ms. Schiff as a source by a member of Wikipedia's management team because of his respected position within the Wikipedia community. He was willing to describe his work as a Wikipedia administrator but would not identify himself other than by confirming the biographical details that appeared on his user page. At the time of publication, neither we nor Wikipedia knew Essjay's real name."

Jordan's real identity first became known when Wikia hired him as a community manager. His name and a photo appeared on his Wikia user page when he started work in January. Though some people pointed out that they couldn’t be certain "Ryan Jordan" was Essjay’s name either (we refer to him as Jordan primarily for convenience), Wikia would have needed his real identity in order to put him on the payroll. In the aftermath of these events, Jordan also left Wikia.

Wikia had hired Jordan for reasons entirely unrelated to his misrepresentations. The position for which he was hired called for advanced wiki editing skills, assisting community members, and testing new features – qualifications Jordan had amply demonstrated, for example, in helping coordinate the Counter-Vandalism Unit and the Mediation Committee. As Kat Walsh (who held a similar position at Wikia before leaving for law school) put it, "Heaven knows Wikia does not care about Ph.D.s in theology."

On Wikipedia, however, the new persona began to prompt questions about how to square it with the old. In response, Jordan said that he never hid his personality, but used disinformation about what he called unimportant details. After The New Yorker posted its note, Jordan wrote that he was "sorry if anyone in the Wikipedia community has been hurt by my decision to use disinformation to protect myself."

Jimmy Wales was originally quoted in the New Yorker editors' note defending the Essjay persona, saying, "I regard it as a pseudonym and I don't really have a problem with it." Busy traveling from India to Japan, Wales later called for Jordan to resign his positions of trust, in light of the additional revelations about fake credentials being used in Wikipedia discussions. Jordan's apology and Wales's statements were each followed by vociferous discussions on their talk pages as well as on several community pages. Some of these discussions, as well as a Wikipedia article newly created about Jordan, also saw attempts to delete the pages amid calls for greater restraint to be exercised.

In his apology, Jordan went on at length about the trouble he had gone through on behalf of Wikipedia and in being interviewed by Schiff. He also made the extraordinary claim that Schiff had "made several offers to compensate me for my time" during the course of the interview.

Reputable media publications reject the practice of paying interview subjects as unethical, and it is usually limited to sensationalist tabloids. The New Yorker generally enjoys a sterling reputation for ethics as well as fact-checking, which would help explain its attention to correcting a months-old article on a point tangential to the thrust of the story. New Yorker deputy editor Pam McCarthy said the magazine’s policy prohibits payment for interviews and strenuously defended Schiff's integrity, calling this "one of the worst charges that can be made about a reporter." Stacy Schiff flatly denied Jordan's claim, saying, "This is complete nonsense."

Jordan could not be reached for comment and his only subsequent Wikipedia edits were to announce his departure. Based on earlier statements he made, it is possible that he used calling cards to phone Schiff for the interview, and his claim may have referred to an offer to reimburse the cost of those calls. If this is what he meant, the mistake of referring to compensation for his "time" instead of his "expenses", though it may seem legalistic, was critical. Schiff's response did not address whether this alternate interpretation was correct.

McCarthy was also quoted in a New York Times story about the incident explaining why The New Yorker went ahead without corroborating all of the information in its story. She stated, "We were comfortable with the material we got from Essjay because of Wikipedia's confirmation of his work and their endorsement of him."

Wikimedia Foundation grants coordinator Danny Wool, who actually referred Jordan along with several other possible interview candidates to Schiff, responded: "In suggesting Essjay to Stacy...I stated that one of the appealing things about his story was the extreme anonymity. I also stated that he had turned down requests for interviews in the past, and that I was not sure he would agree. I was not asked about Essjay at all by the fact checker, who contacted me and discussed the other points of the article at length." (For further analysis, see Andrew Lih's blog.)

WikiWorld is a weekly comic, carried by the Signpost, that highlights a few of the fascinating but little-known articles in the vast Wikipedia archives. The text for each comic is excerpted from one or more existing Wikipedia articles. WikiWorld offers visual interpretations on a wide range of topics: offbeat cultural references and personality profiles, obscure moments in history and unlikely slices of everyday life - as well as "mainstream" subjects with humorous potential.

Cartoonist Greg Williams developed the WikiWorld project in cooperation with the Wikimedia Foundation, and is releasing the comics under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere. Williams works as a visual journalist for the US-based The Tampa Tribune, a daily newspaper in Tampa, Florida. He also has worked as an illustrator and designer at newspapers in Dubuque, Iowa, and Dayton, Ohio.

(← Prev)	Signpost archives	(Next →)

The Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year ended this week. The winner, at left, was a picture of Aurora Borealis, with 83 votes. A close second was a picture of a French homeless person, with 78 votes. A picture of a Blue Jay and a picture of two hoverflies mating in mid-air tied for third, with 70 votes.

After community approval and first applications last month, the process of usurping other users' accounts has been put into effect. The process is allowed only when taking the username of a user with no prior edits or log entries, save for an entry in the user creation log. As of press time, 50 usurpations had been performed.

"WikiCamp India", held on 25 February at Tidel Park in Chennai, India, attracted over 300 participants from throughout the country, including administrators Bhadani, Ganeshk, and Sundar. The event was covered by multiple Indian press sources, including the Indian Express ([1]), and is expected to have raised Wikipedia's profile within the country significantly.

The German Wikipedia reached 1,000 Exzellente Artikel this week with Pamir (Schiff) (English: Pamir (ship)), becoming the second language to reach that milestone. With 1,002 articles, about 1 in 550 articles are featured in the German Wikipedia, compared to about 1 in 1310 articles on the English Wikipedia.

A Wired story about Wikipedia, "The Book Stops Here", has been chosen by the University of Michigan Press for inclusion in its volume The Best of Technology Writing 2006. One odd point about the selection—the article was actually published in the magazine's March 2005 issue (see archived story).

• The Nepal Bhasa Wikipedia reaches 10,000 articles.
• The Russian Wikipedia has reached 140,000 articles.
• The German Wikipedia has 1,000 featured articles.
• The Thai Wikipedia has reached 20,000 users.
• The Lombard Wikipedia has reached 15,000 articles.
• The Vietnamese Wikipedia has reached 500,000 edits.
• The Lithuanian Wikipedia has reached 40,000 articles.
• The Old Church Slavonic Wikipedia has reached 100 articles.
• The French Wikinews has reached 1,500 articles.
• The Wikipedia of Ripuarian languages has reached 6,000 articles.

Thirteen users were granted admin status via the Requests for Adminship process this week: Fram (nom), Trebor Rowntree (nom), Rlevse (nom), BigHaz (nom), Andrwsc (nom), Georgewilliamherbert (nom), Deryck Chan (nom), Adam Cuerden (nom), Bubba hotep (nom), Harryboyles (nom), Jesse Viviano (nom), Veinor (nom) and AuburnPilot (nom).

Sixteen articles were promoted to featured status last week: Rhodes blood libel (nom), Edwin Taylor Pollock (nom), Uranium (nom), Abbas Kiarostami (nom), Hamersley, Western Australia (nom), Iguanodon (nom), Wesley Clark (nom), Paul Collingwood (nom), T-26 (nom), Crusaders (rugby) (nom), Hoysala architecture (nom), Wood Badge (nom), Calvin Coolidge (nom), Fairy tale (nom), Montreal screwjob (nom) and Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back (nom).

Seven articles were de-featured last week: The Temptations, Ridge Route, Margin of error, Cat, Weight training, Military history of the Soviet Union and Battle of Alesia.

Three lists were promoted to featured status last week: List of California birds, List of molecules in interstellar space and List of Dad's Army episodes.

One sound was promoted to featured status last week: "The Four Seasons" - Wichita State University Chamber Players^ⓘ.

One topic was promoted to featured status last week: 2003 Atlantic hurricane season.

Three portals were promoted to featured status this month: Portal:Religion, Portal:Electronics and Portal:World War I.

The following featured articles were displayed last week on the Main Page as Today's featured article: Banksia integrifolia, Aspasia, Immune system, Chicago Bears, Galaxy, Turkey and Law.

The following featured pictures were displayed last week on the Main Page as picture of the day: Movable Type, Snow Crystal, Chicago Skyline, Frédéric Chopin, Spruce Grouse, Abraham Lincoln and Windsor Castle.

Two pictures were promoted to featured status last week:

• 
  The Starry Night
• 
  Egeskov Castle

Slight changes were made to image pages for consistency between images with higher-resolution versions available and those without. Also, when byte sizes are printed on pages such as image pages, sizes of over 1 MB will now have two decimal places of precision, instead of truncating to the nearest megabyte. (Raimond Spekking, T9782, r20070 and r20151)

Special:Doubleredirects and Special:Brokenredirects have been updated to use the relatively new redirect table, and are consequently much faster. They were previously disabled on some large Wikimedia Foundation wikis such as the English Wikipedia, but may now be periodically updated again on all wikis. (patch by WebBoy, T10799, r20071)

It is now possible to view the contributions of certain ranges of IP addresses, with the last or last two octets permitting wildcards. IP ranges are input in CIDR notation, like Special:Contributions/127.0.0.0/16 or Special:Contributions/127.0.0.0/24. Only /16 and /24 ranges are currently permitted. (patch by Maxim Semenik, T3035, r20075)

MediaWiki:Badfiletype has been split into three different messages for three different cases: MediaWiki:Filetype-badmime, MediaWiki:Filetype-badtype, and MediaWiki:Filetype-missing. (Raimond Spekking, T10728, r20100)

When unwatching multiple pages at once from Special:Watchlist/edit, the confirmation messages are properly listed (and given a CSS class) for easier reading and styling. (Raimond Spekking and Simetrical, T10747, r20136)

Special:Linksearch now allows filtering by namespace. (Raimond Spekking, T9804, r20144)

Previous deletion logs are now shown when deleting a page. (patch by Thomas Dalton, T11118, r20156)

Parentheses will now display correctly in the "other languages" display when the directionality of the language's name is different from the current directionality. (Compare: "قازاقشا (تٴوتە)" vs. "‫قازاقشا (تٴوتە)‬".) (Niklas Laxström, T5953, r20081)

In the event that someone somehow ends up following an "undo" link for a revision with no predecessors (such as if the URL is manually modified or earlier revisions were deleted since the link was created), the software will now fail gracefully instead of crashing with a cryptic PHP fatal error. (Brion Vibber, r20154)

Some updates were made to non-English messages, specifically:

• Cantonese (thanks to Shinjiman)
• Cree (thanks to Tristan Miller)
• Finnish (thanks to Niklas Laxström)
• German (thanks to Raimond Spekking and Arnomane)
• Hebrew (thanks to Rotem Liss)
• Indonesian (thanks to Ivan Lanin)
• Italian (thanks to BrokenArrow)
• Latin (thanks to UV)
• Occitan (thanks to Cédric)
• Upper Sorbian (thanks to Dundak)

Internationalization help is always appreciated! See m:Localization statistics for how complete the translations of languages you know are, and post any updates to Mediazilla.

The Arbitration Committee opened one case this week, and closed two cases.

• India-Pakistan: A case involving a dispute between Rama's Arrow and others, and Nadirali, Szhaider and others, over whether certain people (as article subjects) should be categorised as Indian or Pakistani, and what should occur as a result of this. As a result of the case, Nadirali, Szchaider, Unre4L and Siddiqui were each banned for one year.

• Derek Smart: A case involving a dispute over the inclusion of critical material in the Derek Smart article. Various editors on both sides of the dispute claim that the other has violated policy in promoting their case, and some suggest that various accounts (Supreme Cmdr and WarHawkSP inter alia) are in fact used by Smart himself, citing as evidence perceived similarities in their writing styles. These editors deny the allegations. As a result of the case, remedies were enacted prohibiting single-purpose accounts (of which Mael-Num, WarHawk, WarHawkSP, and Supreme_Cmdr are named as examples) from reverting the article, and banning Supreme Cmdr for one year, and banning him from editing the Smart article.

• Falun Gong: A case regarding the conduct of various editors on the Falun Gong article. Olaf Stephanos and Asdfg12345 allege that Samuel Luo has edit-warred in removing pro-Falun Gong material from the article, while Luo, Tomananda and others allege that Stephanos, Asdfg and others have edit-warred (including page blanking) in removing anti-Falun Gong material.

• Armenia-Azerbaijan: A case, brought by ex-arbitrator Dmcdevit, regarding a dispute between Armenian and Azerbaijani editors on a large number of articles.

• Free Republic: A case involving the actions of DeanHinnen, BenBurch and Fairness And Accuracy For All on the Free Republic article and elsewhere. Both sides allege incivility, and Hinnen alleges stalking in real life.

• Occupation of Latvia: A case regarding the discussion over the propriety of the article in question having its current scope to be titled Occupation of Latvia 1940-1945. Some editors, notably Irpen, allege that the issue is merely a content dispute (upon which the committee has traditionally declined to rule), but others, especially Constanz feel that there has been abuse of dispute tags, and possibly WP:NOR violations. Remedies admonishing the parties for their behaviour, and strongly encouraging them to enter into mediation have the support of five arbitrators.

• Barrett v. Rosenthal: A case brought by Peter M. Dodge involving the actions of Ilena and Fyslee. According to Dodge, Ilena was initially reported to AN/I for "posting links to sites that some considered to be attack sites". Various users attempted to assist Ilena, but "This was sabotaged...when Fyslee posted a link to a site that attacked Ilena in a personal manner". The title of the case refers to Barrett v. Rosenthal, a decision of the Supreme Court of California, which ruled that internet users and providers were not liable for the republication of defamatory statements, which some editors believe provides protection for Wikipedia. According to Durova, Ilena is the Rosenthal in that case, and she (Ilena) alleges that Fyslee has a close relationship with Barrett. Fred Bauder has proposed remedies, with the support of five arbitrators, banning Ilena for one year, and prohibiting her and Fyslee from editing the articles in question.

• Starwood: A case involving links to Starwood Festival-related articles from various pages. Paul Pigman, who brought the case, alleges that Rosencomet "persistently and systematically" added these links, perhaps to an extent that violates WP:SPAM, and that Hanuman Das, Ekajati and 999 have harassed users attempting to remove the links. Mattisse confirms that she has been harassed by Hanuman Das, Ekajati and 999, but that she has no issue of harassment with Rosencomet himself. Hanuman Das has asked that his name be removed from the request, as "I decline to participate", citing that he has not edited the links since he agreed not to on the 5th of December. Although Arbitration is not a consensual process, he also seems to have exercised the right to vanish. 999 and Ekajati deny the allegations, and allege that Mattisse has used multiple sockpuppets to request the links and then call for their removal. In addition, various users allege that Rosencomet has a WP:COI, as the executive director of the for-profit ACE LLC, which promotes the festival. Hanuman Das and 999 have been blocked indefinitely as sockpuppets of Ekajati, who has been blocked as puppetmaster. Fred Bauder has proposed a remedy cautioning Rosencomet "to avoid aggressive editing of articles when there is a question of conflict of interest".

• Robert Prechter: A case regarding the behaviour of Rgfolsom and Smallbones on the Socionomics and Robert Prechter pages. Rgfolsom alleges that Smallbones has violated WP:NPOV, WP:CIVIL and WP:DR (by abusing the mediation process), and that he has added "smears, demonstrable falsehoods, and a calculated overemphasis on quotes of critics". In response, Smallbones alleges that Rgfolsom has violated WP:V and WP:NPOV by removing claims critical of Prechter, and adding claims complimentary to him, and WP:COI because he is one of Prechter's employees. Fred Bauder has proposed a remedy banning Smallbones from editing articles and talk pages relating to Prechter. It has the support of two arbitrators.

• Philwelch: A case regarding the actions of Philwelch. A number of editors, principally Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington allege that he has taken "very controversial" sysop actions. Philwelch has since been voluntarily desysopped. Flcelloguy has proposed a principle, which would be carried were the case closed, stating that admins who request desysopping under non-controversial circumstances may have adminship restored upon request, although remedies would be enacted defining Philwelch's desysopping as controversial, and requiring him to reapply through RfA.

• Daniel Brandt deletion wheel war: A case, referred to the committee by Jimbo Wales, regarding a wheel war on the Daniel Brandt article. Wales summarily desysopped Yanksox, Geni and Freakofnurture, and referred the case to ArbCom. If closed, Yanksox and Geni would be desysopped, and Gaillimh banned for ten days, but Freakofnurture would be resysopped.

• Waldorf education: In pursuance of a remedy passed in the initial case, Fred Bauder has initiated a review of all parties' behaviour, and has proposed a remedy banning Pete K from the article and those relating to it indefinitely, which has been supported by Matthew Brown.